Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-4rdpn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-09T15:46:25.462Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Further Notes On The Language of the Prose Inscriptions Of hellenistic Athens1

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 February 2009

Alan S. Henry
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

emended in with the note ‘hanc formam doricam defendere studet G. Fraenkel Glotta ii. 33’.Fraenkel argues that this form is the product of a conscious effort to avoidconfusion and not ‘ein bloss‘

Type
Research Article
Information
The Classical Quarterly , Volume 19 , Issue 2 , December 1969 , pp. 289 - 305
Copyright
Copyright © The Classical Association 1969

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

2 Cf. Meisterhans, , Grammatik der attischen Inschriften 3, p. 115.Google Scholar

1 This is one Despite the Aeolic appearance of his name, he appears from his demotic to be Athenian. Cf. the name 5889 (s.i).

2 Evidence presented in this article per taining to the periods before 323 B.C. and after 146 B.c. is offered merely as a rough point of comparison for the evidence of the Hellenistic period. It was culled from a rapid examination of the relevant epigraphical material, and is in no way to be considered as precise.

1 Op. cit., p. 148, § 60. 3.

2 Ibid., p. 157, §62. I.

3 Ibid., p. 169, § 64. 3.

4 Cf. ibid., pp. 192-3, 77. 9.

5 For the tripartite (state, sub-unit, private) classification of the evidence see C.Q. N.S. xvii (1967), 257 n. 2. (Hereinafter, except where the classification of an example is made clear by a sub-heading, ‘state’ inscriptions have no sign added to their numbering to denote them; ‘sub-unit’ inscriptions are denoted by ‘U’ written between the line number and date; ‘private’ inscriptions by ‘P’ in the same position.)

1 Op. cit., pp. 188-9, § 76. 3.

1 Cf. Meisterhans, , op. cit., pp. 240–7.Google Scholar

1 By ‘non-formulaic’ I mean examples which occur only once.

1 In the examples quoted the following instance of it in the period under examinaabbreviations have been employed: ‘Ath’ tion. It must be stressed, however, that this Athenians;‘NAth’ =non-Athenians;‘Iso’ . An asterisk placed after a formula indicates that I have found only one instance of it the period under examination. It must be stressed, however, that this does not imply that instances do not exist outside that period.

1 Handbuch der griechischm Epigraphik, ii. 856

2 Now IG ii2. 7861, q.v.

3 Op. cit., p. 857.