Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t8hqh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-03T19:18:50.907Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Ranters Ranting: Reflections on a Ranting Counter Culture

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 July 2009

G. F. S. Ellens
G. F. S. Ellens
Affiliation:
Currently living in Japan where he is studying Japanese life and religion. He wishes to acknowledge a scholarship from the Fund for the Study of the Great Religions aiding him in his study.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

The Ranter counter culture was a phenomenon of Puritan England. It was a movement among lower-class people numbering several thousands—we do not know exactly how many—widely distributed in London and rural England. In describing this phenomenon as a movement, however, one must be cautious since this was not a movement towards a goal: it was a movement of repulsion away from English society as represented by the Puritans. It implied a rejection of the Puritan Establishment—its ethics, its values, and its goals.

Type
Research Article
Information
Church History , Volume 40 , Issue 1 , March 1971 , pp. 91 - 107
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1971

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. A study of Ranters and of influences upon them is made in Ellens, G. F. S., Case Studies in Seventeenth Century Enthusiasm, Especially the Ranters (unpublished Columbia University Doctoral Dissertation, 1968).Google Scholar

2. Edwards, , Gangraena, 3rd. ed. (London, 1646), Sec. 2, Part 1.Google Scholar

3. Pagitt, E., Heresiography (London, 1661), pp. 259ff.Google Scholar

4. Baxter, R., Reliquiae Baxterianae (London 1696), ed. by Thomas, J. M. Lloyd (London: Dent, 1925), passim.Google Scholar

5. Fox, G., Journal, rev. ed. by Penney, 1911 (London: Dent, 1924.)Google Scholar

6. See Nuttall, G. F., Richard Baxter, (London: Thos. Nelson, 1965), p. 37.Google Scholar

7. Fox, , journal, vol. II, p. 125; but in America in 1672; see p. 222.Google Scholar

8. Whiting, C. E., Studies in English Puritanism from the Restoration to the Revolution, 1660–1668 (London: S.P.C.K., 1931), p. 272Google Scholar; cf. Barbour, H., The Quakers in Puritan England (New Haven, Conn.: Yale U. Press, 1964), p. 101.Google Scholar Almost nothing is presently known about Banters in America.

9. [Anonymous], A Nest of Serpents Discovered or a Knot of Heretiques revived Called the ADAMITES (No publisher, printer or place of origin is given).

10. Fox, , journal, pp. 27–28.Google Scholar

11. Edw., Stokes, The Wiltshire Rant (London, 1652).Google Scholar

12. Stubs, T., The Ranters Declaration (London, 1650).Google Scholar

13. [Anonymous], The Ranters Ranting (London, 1650).Google Scholar

14. The only surviving evidence concerning Bauthumley's active antinomianism accuses him of Ranter cursing. In the army his tongue was bored through.

15. A product of this concern was a sermon “The Cure of Melancholy and Overmuch Sorrow by Faith and Physick,” published in 1683. It went at once through several editions and several more in the early 1700s.

16. Lodowicke Muggleton, born 1609, founded his sect c. 1651, died 1698. See his Acts of the Witnesses (London, 1699), esp. pp. 10, 16–18.Google Scholar

17. Muggleton, , Acts, p. 18.Google Scholar

18. Baxter, , Rel. Bax., p. 8Google Scholar, who writes much about this problem describes in detail the case of a friend who was horribly oppressed with guilt for weaknesses which he could not rectify and whose “conscience could have no relief or ease but in changing his judgment and disowning the teachers and doctrines which had restrained him.…’

19. Clarkson, L., a Ranter leader, makes this quite clear in his The Lost Sheep Found (London, 1660).Google Scholar

20. Burton, R., The Anatomy of Melancholy (1621)Google Scholar wrote: “But who shall dwell in these vast bodies, Earths, Worlds ‘if they be inhabited? rational creatures’? as Kepler demands, ‘or have they souls to be saved? or do they inhabit a better part of the world than we do? Are we or they Lords of the World? And how are all things made for man’?”

21. David, Mathew, The Age of Charles I (London: Eyre and Spottiswood, 1951), pp. 120–121.Google Scholar

22. Anthony à Wood, Athenae Oxoniensis (ed. of 1815), vol. iii, pp. 959f. and 1009.Google Scholar

23. Clarkson admits to this same procedure in his Lost Sheep Found.

24. Coppe, A. in A Second Fiery Flying Roll (London, 1650), pp. 10–11Google Scholar writes: “.… yet I can if it be my will, kisse and hug Ladies, and love my neighbour's wife as my selfe, without sin.”

25. Coppe, A., Some Sweet Sips of Some Spiritual Wine (London, 1649), p. 54.Google Scholar

26. Coppe, ibid., p. 55.

27. Coppe, ibid., “Contents.”

28. Coppe, A., Coppes Return to the Wayes of Truth (London, 1651), “Preface.”Google Scholar

29. Otto, R., The Idea of the Holy, tr. Harvey, J. W. (London: O.U.P., rev. ed. 1928), p. 16.Google Scholar Other references applicable to Coppe are on pages 31, 57, 113.

30. Clarkson's Lost Sheep Fownd provides a good picture of Ranter revellings.

31. Coppe, A., A Fiery Flying Soil (London, 1650), “Preface.”Google Scholar

32. Coppe, ibid., p. 7.

33. Coppe, ibid., p. 1.

34. Coppe, A Second Fiery Flying Roll, ch. V.

35. This theme is developed by Cohn, N., The Pursuit of the Millenium, 2nd ed. (New York: Harper Torchbooks, 1961), pp. 195ff.Google Scholar

36. Thomas Underbill in. his Hell Brolce Loose (London 1660)Google Scholar says of Ranters that they “danced and roared … and went into frenzies, and lay with their bodies swollen, acted strangely, and fell into raptures and blasphemings.”

37. Barclay, R., The Inner Life of the Religious Societies of Commonwealth (London: Hodder and Stoughton, 1876), p. 415.Google Scholar

38. [Anonymous], The Banters Recantation (London, 1650), unpaginated.Google Scholar

39. A dictum of Goethe's was, “Wie ein Mann ist so ist seiu Gott.”

40. [Anonymous], The Banters Banting (London, 1650).Google Scholar

41. Ed.Hyde, , A Wonder and Yet No Wonder, a Great Red Dragon in Heaven (London, 1651), p. 24.Google Scholar

42. Coppe, , A Fiery flying Roll, p. 12.Google Scholar