Published online by Cambridge University Press: 28 July 2009
American Christianity is so diversified and confusing and its material is of such vast extent that the scholars who have worked at the broader aspects of its history have had to bring to their study certain interpretative theses in order to find their way through the material at all. These interpretative theses, some implicitly held and others explicitly stated, some relatively adequate and others fairly weak, have paved the way for a great deal of intensive research, so that the young discipline of American Church History has a solid and illuminating body of material. Out of the research thus far undertaken have sprung new themes of interpretation, so that what may be called an “historiographical cycle” operates. This interaction of research and interpretation has functioned sufficiently well so that the overall picture of American Christian history grows steadily clearer. The process of clarification has, however, proceeded satisfactorily only to a point—to the Civil War. For the years since the Civil War, the picture has not yet come into sharp focus. The interpretative theses thus far proposed have had serious limitations, and as a result the historiographical cycle has not operated to best advantage. The excellent monographic studies that have been done remain therefore somewhat unrelated and leave us with a rather fragmentary understanding of religious history since 1865. Yet in these years occurred decisive developments which must be further probed and clarified if we are to understand more fully the contemporary American religious scene, now so important a part of the total life of the world church. To be sure most of the significant movements of the period have received some attention, but they can be fully understood and their significance grasped only as they are delineated as part of the total history of American Christianity with the interconnections traced and the polarities analyzed. More fruitful and better-directed monographic studies will follow from the setting forth of fresh and rounded themes of interpretation; the historiographical cycle will then operate to better advantage for this important period.
2. It is customary in the periodization of American history to date a new period from 1865. As far as church history is concerned, the basic similarity of the Protestant pattern before and after 1865 suggests that a preferable periodization is 1830–1930, with a possible subdivision in 1890. The latter two-thirds of this period now needs particular attention. I am grateful to Professor Robert Hastings Nichols for an illuminating discussion of these matters.
3. “Church History Past and Present,” Union Seminary Quarterly Review, V (November, 1949), 13.Google Scholar
4. “The Art of Church History,” Church History, XX (March, 1951), 9.Google Scholar
5. Letters, 1892–1918, p. 279Google Scholar, quoted in Commager, Henry Steele, The American Mind: An Interpretation of American Thought and Character Since the 1880's (New Haven: Yale University Press, 1950), pp. 134 f.Google Scholar
6. The History of Religion in the United States (New York: Macmillan, 1924), pp. vii f.Google Scholar
7. Massachusetts Historical Society Proceedings, LXIV (June, 1932), 523–47.Google Scholar
8. E.g., Abell, Aaron Ignatíus, The Urban Impact on American Protestantism 1865–1900 (Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1943)Google Scholar; Loewenberg, B. J., “Darwinism Comes to America,” Mississippi Valley Historical Review, XXVIII (1941), 339–68CrossRefGoogle Scholar; May, Henry F., Protestant Churches and Indnstrial America (New York: Harper & Bros., 1949).Google Scholar
9. De Tocqueville, Alexis, Democracy in America (New York: Alfred A. Knopf, 1945) I, 303.Google Scholar
10. Religion in America (New York: Harper & Bros., 1856), asp. pp. 536 ff., 586 f., 658 ff.Google Scholar
11. The Course of American Democratic Thought: An Intellectual History Since 1815 (New York: The Ronald Press Co., 1940), p. 14.Google Scholar
12. Quoted by Tewksbury, Donald G. in The Founding of American Colleges and Universities Before the Civil War (New York: Teachers' College, 1932), p. 56.Google Scholar
13. The Burned-over District: The Social and Intellectual History of Enthusiastic Religion in Western New York, 1800–1850 (Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 1950), p. 108.Google Scholar
14. Ibid., pp. 108 f.
15. Orr, J. Edwin, The Second Evangelical Awakening in Britain (London: Marshall, Morgan & Scott, Ltd., 1949), p. 21.Google Scholar
16. Garrison, Winfred Ernest, The March of Faith: The Story of Religion in America Since 1865 (New York: Harper & Bros., 1933), p. 10.Google Scholar
17. May, op. cit., p. 6.
18. Douglass, H. Paul, “Religion–The Protestant Faiths,” in Stearns, Harold E. (ed.), America Now: An Inquiry into Civilization in the United States (New York: Charles Scribner's Sons, 1938), pp. 505–27.Google Scholar
19. De Tocqueville, op. cit., I, 303.
20. Cf. Hopkins, C. Howard, History of the Y.M.C.A. in North America (New York: Association Press, 1951).Google Scholar
21. Thompson, Ernest Trice, Changing Emphases in American Preaching (Philadelphia: Westminster Press, 1943), p. 86.Google Scholar
22. Cf. Williams, Daniel Day, The Andover Liberals: A Study in American Theology (New York; King's Crown Press, 1941)Google Scholar; cf. also Hammar, George, Christian Realism in Contemporary American Theology (Uppsala: A.-B. Lundequistska Bokhandeln, 1940)Google Scholar, especially the note on p. 153, where he stresses the evangelical center of Rauschenbusch's liberal theology.
23. Loud, Grover C., Evangelized America (New York: Dial Press, 1928), p. 257.Google Scholar
24. Terminology used by Kirsopp Lake, cf. Atkins, Gains Glenn, Religion in Our Times (New York: Round Table Press, 1932), p. 219.Google Scholar
25. American Journal of Theology, XVI (January, 1912), 65.Google Scholar
26. Note especially the cautious use of it in Hopkins, C. Howard, The Rise of the Social Gospel in American Protestantism 1865–1915 (“Yale Studies in Religious Education,” Vol. XIV [New Haven: Yale University Press, 1940]).Google Scholar
27. Cf. Arnold, Nash (ed.), Protestant Thought in the Twentieth Century (New York: Macmillan, 1951).Google Scholar
28. “Some Notes on Recent Periodical Literature on Colonial American Church History,” Church History, XX (December, 1951), 73.Google Scholar
29. Douglass, loc cit., p. 514.
30. Ibid., p. 515.
31. Atkins, op. cit., pp. 156 f.
32. Will, , Gibbons, II, 886 f.Google Scholar, quoted by Maynard, Theodore, The Story of American Catholicism, (New York: Macmillan, 1941), pp. 550 f.Google Scholar
33. Sperry, Willard L., Religion in America (New York: Macmillan, 1946), p. 219.Google Scholar
34. The Kingdom of God in America (Chicago: Willett, Clark & Co., 1937), p. xiii.Google Scholar
35. “The Task of the Church Historian,” The Chronicle, XII (July, 1949), 139Google Scholar. Cf. Baillie, John, Invitation to Pilgrimage (New York: Charles Seribner's Sons, 1942).Google Scholar