Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rcrh6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-30T15:22:13.266Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Plan of Union in New York

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 July 2009

Robert Hastings Nichols
Robert Hastings Nichols
Affiliation:
Auburn Theological Seminary
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

The history of the Plan of Union has been written largely under the influence of denominational zeal, jealousy, and antipathy. Underlying much of the writing have been the assumptions that a main object of religious endeavor is to build up denominational organizations and enlarge the statistics, that denominations ought to be kept “pure,” that movements of individuals or churches from one to another are not altogether creditable and justify suspicion of inferior motives on the part of somebody. For example, the Rev. James H. Dill, in an article on “Congregationalism in Western New York” in the Congregational Quarterly in 1859, which has recently been cited as an authority, refers to churches “which have been spirited away from Congregationalism”; and Dr. Joseph P. Thompson, in an article on “Congregationalism in Eastern New York” in the same periodical in 1860, says “The Black River Association … had increased to seventeen churches when in 1817, it was induced to unite with the Watertown Presbytery. … After some years, some of the Congregational churches withdrew from this entanglement, and re-organized in an Association.” On the other side, Dr. Samuel J. Baird in 1868 said in A History of the New School, “The multiplication of Congregational ministers, in the Presbyterian Church, was no increase of strength; but the introduction of an element of weakness, division and heresy.”

Type
Articles
Information
Church History , Volume 5 , Issue 1 , March 1936 , pp. 29 - 51
Copyright
Copyright © American Society of Church History 1936

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 History of the Congregational Churches in the United States (1894), 318.Google Scholar

2 The Church-Kingdom (1887), 360–1.Google Scholar

3 Gillett, E. H., History of the Presbyterian Church in the U. S. A. (1864), I, 438–39Google Scholar. Cf. Walker, , op. cit., 315.Google Scholar

4 Hodge, C., Constitutional History of the Presbyterian Church in the U. S. A. (1851), II, 420–25.Google Scholar

5 Minutes of the Synod of New York and Philadelphia, Records of the Presbyterian Church in the U. S. A., 364, 374.Google Scholar

6 Minutes of General Assembly of Presbyterian Church U. S. A., 1789–1820, 20.Google Scholar

7 Ib., 53, 74.

8 Ib., 80–81, 96. It shows the atmosphere surrounding the operation of the Plan of Union that similar arrangements for delegates were made by the General Assembly in 1803–04 with the Convention of Congregational Ministers in the State of Vermont, in 1810 with the General Association of New Hampshire, in 1811 with the General Association of Massachusetts and in 1828 with the General Conference of Maine. In 1827 the Assembly expressed desire for discontinuance of the voting of delegates; and the Maine arrangement excluded voting. Another sign of atmosphere is that the General Assembly's “Narrative of the State of Religion” in the early years of the century regularly contains reports of conditions in “our sister churches” of New England.

9 Ib., 217, 249.

10 Minutes of General Assembly, 1801, in Minutes of the General Assembly of the Presbyterian Church U. S. A., 1789–1880, 212.Google Scholar

11 Ib., 216. Williston Walker says “There is every reason to believe that the originator of the discussion” of the subject in the Connecticut Association waa the younger Jonathan Edwards, then president of Union College, a delegate of the Assembly to the Association; Creeds and Platforms of Congregationalism, 529.Google Scholar

12 Ib., 221.

13 Ib., 224–25.

14 Connecticut Evangelical Magazine, II (1801–1802), 116.Google Scholar

15 Ib., 224–25. In 1806 the General Assembly ordered “that a number of copies of this plan be printed, and delivered to the missionaries who may be sent by the Assembly among the people concerned.” 372.

16 Ira Conflict at Palmyra, Benjamin Judd at Windsor; Hotchkin, J. H., History of Western New York, 29.Google Scholar

17 Seth Williston, Jedediah Bushnell, Congregationalists; Jedediah Chapman, John Lindsley, Presbyterians.

18 New Hartford, 1795; Centennial Day of the Presbyterian Church of New Hartford, N. Y., 26–8.Google Scholar

19 Historical Manual of Kingsborough Avenue Presbyterian Church, Gloversvttle.

20 Cf. Fowler, P. H., History of Presbyterianism within the Bounds of the Synod of Central New York (1877) 55Google Scholar; Patton, J. H., Popular History of the Presbyterian Church U. S. A. (1900), 238–39.Google Scholar

21 Sprague, W. B., Annals of the American Pulpit (1868). III, 403–4.Google Scholar

22 Gillett, , op. cit., I, 393–94.Google Scholar

23 59.

24 Hotchkin, , op. cit., 34.Google Scholar

25 Ib., 226–30.

26 Ms. Minutes, 18–20.

27 Ms. Minutes, II, 42.

28 Auburn, 1802, Hawley, C., History of the First Presbyterian Church of Auburn, 10–13Google Scholar; Sherburne Second, 1804, Minutes of Oneida Presbytery, in Fowler, , op. cit., 413Google Scholar; Holland Patent, 1807, Centennial Services, Presbyterian Church of Holland Patent.

29 Elmira, organized 1795 as Presbyterian, became Congregational after 1805; in 1824 again Presbyterian. New Hartford, organized 1791 as Congregational, became Presbyterian in 1802.

30 Hotchkin, , op. cit., 40–1Google Scholar; Porter, J. J., History of the Presbytery of Geneva, 8.Google Scholar

31 Ms. Minutes. These Minutes were published in the Journal of the Presbyterian Historical Society, X, 217–29, 258–84, XI, 20–38, 49–60.Google Scholar

32 Hotchkin, , op. cit., 86–7.Google Scholar

33 Ms. Minutes of Synod of Albany, I, 105.Google Scholar

34 Ms. Minutes of Middle Association: printed in Journal of Presbyterian Historical Society, XI, 25–7Google Scholar; Ms. Minutes of Synod of Albany, I, 117–21.Google Scholar

35 Minutes of General Assembly, 1789–1820, 404.Google Scholar

36 Journal of Presb. Hist. Soc., XI, 21–2.Google Scholar

37 Ms. Minutes of Synod of Albany, I, 135–36.Google Scholar

38 Journal of Presbyterian Historical Society, XI, 68.Google Scholar

39 Lansing in Hotchkin, Cayuga, op. cit., 358 ff.Google Scholar, Onondaga Hill in Onondaga, ib., 327. These churches had belonged to the Presbytery of Geneva. In 1812 the Synod of Geneva was formed out of the three presbyteries.

40 Dirck Lansing.

41 Ms. Minutes, I, 33.

42 Ib., 23, 31.

43 Hotchkin, , op. cit., 100Google Scholar. Hotchkin was a delegate at the convention.

44 Ib., 101.

45 Ib., 102.

46 Minutes of Oneida Presbytery, in Fowler, , op. cit., 62.Google Scholar

47 Ib., 11, 59.

48 Ib., 11; Hotchkin, , op. cit., 112.Google Scholar

49 Fowler, , op. cit., 11, 59, 68.Google Scholar

50 See Hotchkin, , op. cit., 112–20.Google Scholar

51 Minutes of the Presbytery, in Fowler, , op. cit., 66.Google Scholar

52 Porter, J. J., op. cit., 36.Google Scholar

53 To Dr. Thayer's number should be added the Essex County churches, later referred to, numbering not over 10.

54 Fowler, , op. cit., 58.Google Scholar

55 Thompson, R. E., History of the Presbyterian Churches in the U. S. A. (1895), 114.Google Scholar

56 Hatfield, E. F., Early Annals of Union Theological Seminary (1876), 16.Google Scholar

57 Nye, C. F., Address at Centenary Exercises of the First Presbyterian Congregational Church and Society of Champlain 13.Google Scholar

58 Ms. Minutes, Synod of New York and New Jersey, 499. The Champlain churches, numbering not over ten, should be added to Dr. Thayer's count. This count included the Susquehanna churches.

59 Barnes, G. H., The Anti-Slavery Impulse (1933), 18.Google Scholar

60 New School Presbyterians worked through the A. H. M. S. until the 50's. and the A. B. C. F. M. until 1869.

61 Barnes, G. H., op. cit., 11.Google Scholar

62 Creeds and Platforms, 540–1.Google Scholar