Published online by Cambridge University Press: 28 July 2009
Most of the early leaders of Anabaptism were martyred after a few months or years of activity. Two of the more outstanding exceptions are Menno Simons and Pilgram Marpeck, neither of whom is numbered among the founders of the Anabaptist movement, however. With Menno the world has long been familiar, and the group with which he united now bears his name. His writings in the original Dutch, or in German or English translation, are found in Mennonite homes in Holland, Germany, Switzerland, and America. But even Mennonites know little of Marpeck today. This is all the more remarkable in view of the fact that Marpeck labored among the south-German and Swiss Anabaptists, thus sustaining a more direct relationship to the main body of American Mennonites than does the Dutch Menno Simons. The persecution and oppression which the Swiss and south-German Mennonites long had to bear is responsible, at least in part, for the early disappearance of Marpeck's name among his followers. One may add that this was also the fate of Conrad Grebel, the founder of Swiss Anabaptism. Yet Marpeck was the greatest of the south-German and Swiss Anabaptist leaders, and well deserves a closer study.
1 The German and Dutch literature on Marpeck is listed in the Mennonitisches Lexikon, herausgegeben von Christian Hege und D. Christian Neff, article “Marbeck, Pilgram,” (Frankfurt am Main and Weierhof, Pfalz, 1938) III, 34.
Note also the Mennonitische Geschichtsblaetter, III, (12, 1938), 13–15.Google Scholar
In English see The Mennonite Quarterly Review (Goshen, Indiana), XII (1938), Nos. 3 and 4.Google Scholar
2 Loserth, Johann, Quellen und Forschungen zur Geschichte der Oberdeutschen Taufgesinnten im 16. Jahrhundert. Pilgram Marbecks Antwort auf Kaspar Schwenckfelds Beurteilung des Buches der Bundesbezeugung von 1542. (Wien und Leipzig, 1929), If.Google Scholar
3 Ibid., 175f.
4 Correll, Ernst, “Anabaptism in the Tyrol,” The Mennonite Quarterly Review I, 4 (10, 1927), 49–60.Google Scholar
5 Mennonitisohes Lexikon, I, 310a.Google Scholar
6 Decas fabularum, humani generis sortem, mores, ingenium, varia studia, inventa atque opera—adumbrantium—per Joannem Walchium, Schorndorffensem. (Argentorat, 1609)Google Scholar. Quoted in Roehrich, T. W., “Zur Geschichte der Strassburgischen Wiedertaeufer in den Jahren 1527 bis 1543,” Zeitschrift fuer die historische Theologie (1860), 16.Google Scholar
7 Roehrieh, , “Zur Geschichte der Strassburǵischen Wiedertaeufer,” 9.Google Scholar
8 Baum, Johann Wilhelm, Thesaurus epistolicus Reformatorium AlsaticorumGoogle Scholar. Quoted in Gerbert, Camille, Geschichte der Strassburger Sectenbewegung zur Zeit der Reformation, 1524–1524 (Strassburg, 1889), 98f.Google Scholar
9 Gerbert, , Strassburger Sectenbewegung, 100f.Google Scholar
10 Bender, Harold S., “Conrad Grebel, The Founder of Swiss Anabaptism,” Church History, VII (1938), 176–178.Google Scholar
11 Roehrich, , “Zur Geschichte der Str. Wiedertaeufer,” 52.Google Scholar
12 Staehelin, Ernest, Briefe und Akten zum Leben Oekolampads (Leipzig, 1934) II, 635.Google Scholar
13 Hulshof, A., Geschiedenis van de Doopsgezinden te Straatsburg van 1525 tot 1557 (Amsterdam, 1905), 99.Google Scholar
14 Mennonitisches Lexikon, I. 332f.Google Scholar
15 For an account of this disputation see Roehrich, , “Zur Geschichte der Str. Wiedertaeufer,” 53–55Google Scholar. Schiess, Compare Traugott, Briefwechsel der Brueder Ambrosius und Thomas Blaurer, 1509–1548 (Freiburg, 1908) I, 315fGoogle Scholar. The Blaurer correspondence contains Butzer's own account of his struggles with Marpeck, written after the third disputation.
16 Roehrich, , “Zur Geschichte der Str. Wiedertaeufer”, 56Google Scholar, published the text from. Argent hist. eccl., I, fol. 318.
17 ibid., 17.
18 Schiess, , Briefwechsel, 315f.Google Scholar
19 XII, (1938), 167–202.
20 Roehrich, , “Zur Geschichte der Str. Wiedertaeufer,” 57Google Scholar; also Keller, Ludwig, Monatsheft der Conimenius-Gesellschaft, V (1896), 311–313.Google Scholar
21 Roehrich, ibid., 105.
22 Geschicht-Buch der Hutterischen Brueder. Herausgegeben von den Hutterischen Brueder in Amerika, Canada, durch Prof. Dr. Rudolf Wolkan. (Standoff-Colony bei Macleod, Alta., Canada; Wien, 1923), 176.
23 Gedenkschrift zum 400 Jaehrigen Jubilaeum aer Mennoniten oder Taufgesinnten. 1525–1925 (Ludwigshafen a. Rhein, 1925), 178–282.Google Scholar
24 One copy is in the British Museum, London, and one is in Wuerttembergische Landesbibliothek, Stuttgart. A brief summary of the Vermanung is found in Christian August Salig (1692–1738), Vollstaendige Historie der Augspurgischen Confession (Halle, 1735) III, 1113f.Google Scholar
25 Each of the following libraries has one copy of the Verantwortung: Stadtbibliothek, Zuerich; Bayerische Staatsbibliothek, Munich; and the Studienbibliothek, Olmuetz.
26 See footnote number 2.
27 A photostatic reproduction of the title page of the Testament Explanation is printed in The Mennonite Quarterly Review, XII (1938), 161.Google Scholar
28 von Stetten, Paul, Geschichte der Heil. Roem. Reichs Freyen Stadt Augsburg (Franckfurt und Leipzig, 1743), I, 451Google Scholar; also Roth, Friedrich, Augsburgs Reformationsgeschichte (Muenchen, 1907), III, 248f, 278f.Google Scholar
29 Baumeisterbuch, 141Google Scholar, (Stadt-Archiv, Augsburg). Communicated by the Director, Dr. Heinz Friedrich Deininger. Fr. Roth also knew of this reference to Marpeck's death.
30 von Stetten, Paul, Geschichte der Heil, 451Google Scholar. The von Stetten reference is to the year 1548.
31 Bender, Harold S., “Conrad Grebel,” Church History, VII, 174Google Scholar. See also The Mennonite Quarterly Review, XII, 205–256.Google Scholar
32 Horsch, John: “The Faith of the Swiss Brethren,” The Mennonite Quarterly Review, V, I (01 1931), 20f.Google Scholar
33 Chronica, Zeitbuoch und Geschichtbibel von Anbegyn bisz ini diss gegenwertig A. D. XXXVI, fol. xliiiib.Google Scholar
34 Cornelius, Carl Adolf, Geschichte des Muensterischen Aufruhrs, (Leipzig, 1860), II, 253–259.Google Scholar
35 Böhrich, , “Zur Geschichte der Str. Wiedertaeufer,” 15.Google Scholar
36 Loserth, J., Quellen und Forschungen, 49f.Google Scholar