Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-j824f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-04T18:11:58.877Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Halévy Thesis—A Working Hypothesis? English Revivalism: Antidote for Revolution and Radicalism 1789–1815

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 July 2009

Elissa S. Itzkin
Elissa S. Itzkin
Affiliation:
instructor in history inAdelphi University, Garden City, New York
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

He “saw England with fresh eyes”, and for more than fifty years Elie Halévy's provocative interpretation of the effect of religion on the Victorian out look has continued to engender lively debate and controversy. After his History of the English People in the Nineteenth Century, few historians would contest the practical role of evangelicalism and nonconformity in molding Victorian society. What continues to be challenged is Halévy's claim that the moral influence of the evangelical movement is the parameter within which the social history of nineteenth-century England unfolded.

Type
Research Article
Information
Church History , Volume 44 , Issue 1 , March 1975 , pp. 47 - 56
Copyright
Copyright © American Society of Church History 1975

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Clark, G. Kitson, The Making of Victorian England (Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press, 1962), p. 22.Google Scholar

2. Halévy, Elie, A History of the English People in the Nineteenth Century, 6 vols. (New York: Barnes & Noble, Inc., 1961)Google Scholar; hereafter cited as History.

3. Thompson, E. P., The Making of the English Working Class (New York: Vintage Books, 1963), p. 390.Google Scholar

4. Rudé, George, Debate on Europe, 1815–1850 (New York: Harper Torchbooks, 1972), p. 132.Google Scholar

5. Kitson Clark, P. 22.

6. The excerpts which follow are from Semmel's edition, The Birth of Methodism in England (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1971), pp. 74–77.Google Scholar

7. Semmel, , Introduction to The Birth of Methodism, p. 12.Google Scholar

8. Gillispie, Charles, “The Work of Elie Halévy,” Journal of Modern History 22 (1950): 234.Google Scholar

9. Stretton, Hugh, The Political Sciences, General Principles of Selection in Social Science and History (New York: Basic Books, 1969), pp. 275–276, 282.Google Scholar

10. Gillispie, p. 243.

11. Himmelfarb, Gertrude, Victorian Minds (New York: Alfred A. Knopf, 1968), p. 298.Google Scholar

12. Hobsbawm, E. J., “Methodism and the Threat of Revolution in Britain,” in his Labouring Men, Studies in the History of Labour (New York: Basic Books, 1964).Google Scholar

13. White, R. J., Waterloo to Peterloo (New York: Macmillan and Company, 1957), p. 45.Google Scholar

14. Gillispie, p. 243.

15. Rudé, p. 230.

16. Semmel, Bernard, The Methodist Revolution (New York: Basic Books, 1973), p. 193.Google Scholar

17. Ibid., p. 3.

18. White, p. 27.

19. History, 4:292–293.

20. Gillispie, p. 243.

21. Stretton, p. 282.

22. Stretton, p. 282.

23. History, 1:591.

24. Kitson Clark, p. 20.

25. Hammond, J. L. and Hammond, Barbara, The Town Labourer, 1760–1832 (New York: Longmans, Green and Co., 1917), p. 222.Google Scholar

26. Semmel, , Methodist Revolution, p. 178.Google Scholar

27. Kiernen, V., “Evangelicalism and the French Revolution,” Past and Present 1 (02 1952): 44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

28. Inglis, K. S., Churches and the Working Classes in Victorian England, ed. Perkin, Harold (Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 1963), p. 9.Google Scholar

29. Wearmouth, Robert, Methodism and the Working-Class Movement of England: 1800–1859 (London: The Epworth Press, 1937), p. 16Google Scholar. See also, Edwarls, Maldwyn, After Wesley, A Study of the Social and Political Influence of Methodism in the Middle Period, 1791–1849 (London: The Epworth Press, 1935), pp. 143–147.Google Scholar

30. Thompson, p. 388.

31. Wearmouth, pp. 69–70.

32. Kitson Clark, p. 22.

33. Taylor, E. R., Methodism and Politics: 1791–1851 (London: Cambridge University Press, 1935), p. 32.Google Scholar

34. Kitson Clark, p. 184.

35. Edwards, p. 143.

36. Thompson, p. 46.

37. Ibid., p. 368.

38. Wearmouth, p. 70.

39. Semmel, , Methodist Revolution, p. 170.Google Scholar

40. Ibid., p. 5.

41. Perkin, Harold, The Origins of Modern English Society: 1780–1880 (London, 1969), p. 354.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

42. Thompson, p. 394.

43. Perkin, p. 354.

44. Semmel, , Methodist Revolution, pp. 171–172.Google Scholar

45. Himmelfarb, p. 297.

46. White, pp. 33–34.

47. Hammond and Hammond, p. 287.

48. Rudé, p. 232.

49. Hobsbawm, p. 32.

50. Thompson, p. 389.

51. Semmel, , Introduction to The Birth of Methodism, pp. 25–26.Google Scholar

52. Himmelfarb, p. 299.