Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-r5fsc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-04T09:15:01.808Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Comment on the Essay of Professor Clebsch* History, Bushnell, and Lincoln

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 July 2009

Sydney E. Ahlstrom
Sydney E. Ahlstrom
Affiliation:
Yale University
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

During the 1960 convention of the American Historical Association a session on historical reviewing subjected the noncommittal or picayune irrelevance of these professional offerings to their due measure of censure and derision. Despite the justice of extending such judgments to the genteel and congratulatory “comments” and “critiques” ordinarily given at our conventions, I shall not attempt at any demolition of Professor Clebsch's scholarship or conclusions. This is not because my critical faculties are paralyzed but due to genuine satisfaction with what he has done and gratitude for the glimpse here given of his more extensive research. No more fitting centennial observance of the Civil War could be imagined than a sober examination of the meaning of this, our great national tragedy. Having no desire to manufacture disagreements or magnify quibbles, I can preserve some of the appearances of debate only by urging that the scope of his findings be extended at certain points. To this end I undertake the strangely impossible task of making the point of his essay both broader and sharper.

Type
Research Article
Information
Church History , Volume 30 , Issue 2 , June 1961 , pp. 223 - 230
Copyright
Copyright © American Society of Church History 1961

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. “Darwinism” is too narrow a term, however. The entire complex of developmental, historical, and evolutionary ways of thinking is meant. Why Darwinism per ye made so deep a mark and why Social Darwinism cut so wide a swath in American intellectual life is a separate question of great importance.

2. See Holt, W. S., “The Idea of Scientific History in America,” Journal of the History of Ideas, I (1940)Google Scholar; Strout, Cushing, The Pragmatic Revolt in American History: Carl Becker and Charles Beard (New Haven: Yale University Press, 1958)Google Scholar; and White, Morton G., Social Thought in America: The Revolt Against Formalism (New York: Viking, 1949Google Scholar; reprint, Beacon Press).

3. Schaff, Philip, What Is Church History? A Vindication of the Idea of Historical Development (Philadelphia: Lippiacott, 1846)Google Scholar. The fact that the A.H.A. represents a dominant stream in American thought and the early A.S.C.H. only a substream helps answer the question raised in my first footnote.

4. With post-Civil War problems — urbanism, industrialism, immigration, evolution, and scientific method—Bushnell was less able to cope.

5. Reprinted in his Work and Play; or, Literary Varieties (New York: Scribners, 1864).Google Scholar

6. See the two essays on language in God in Christ (Hartford, 1849)Google Scholar and Christ in Theology (Hartford, 1851)Google Scholar; and also the discussion in Feidelson, Charles Jr, Symbolism and American Literature (University of Chicago Press, 1953; Phoenix paper).Google Scholar

7. Bornkamm, Heinrich, Grundriss zum Studium der Kirchengeschichte (Gütersloh: Bertelsmann, 1949), p. 11.Google Scholar

8. Cheney, Mary Bushnell, Life and Letters of Horace Bushnell (New York: Scribners, 1888), p. 489.Google Scholar

9. “O felix culpa!” See Lewis, R. W. B., The American Adam (University of Chicago Press, 1955Google Scholar; Phoenix paper), chap. iii.

10. See Bayne, Stephen F., The OptionalGod (New York: Oxford University Press, 1953)Google Scholar; Donald, David, LinoolnReconsidered (New York: Knopf, 1956)Google Scholar; Mead, Sidney E., “Abraham Lincoln's ‘Last Beet Hope of Earth’: The American Dream of Destiny and Democracy,” Church History, XXIII (03 1954)Google Scholar; Marech, Wolf-Dieter, Christlicher Glaube und Demokratisches Ethos (Hamburg: Furche-Verlag, 1958)Google Scholar; and Wolf, Wiilliam J., The Almost Chosen People: A Study of the Religion of Abraham Lincoln (New York: Doubleday, 1959)Google Scholar which cites the major literature on the subject.

11. This passing referenee to Karl Barth occasioned more comment and correspondence than anything else I said. It was not a studied or scholarly observation, however. Barth's universalistic interpretation of God's gracious sovereignty is one link, I think. Others are suggested in his “Letter to an East German Pastor” in Brown, R. M., ed., Serving God in a Communist and Land (New York: Association Press, 1960).Google Scholar