Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-8ctnn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-18T19:40:14.509Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The genetic evaluation of crossbred pig populations for heterosis research by microsatellite markers

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 March 2007

Zhang Jing-Hu
Affiliation:
Key Laboratory of Swine Genetics and Breeding, Ministry of Agriculture, College of Animal Science and Veterinary Medicine, Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan 430070, China Department of Biology, Science and Technology, Zhangzhou Normal University, Zhangzhou 363000, China
Xiong Yuan-Zhu*
Affiliation:
Key Laboratory of Swine Genetics and Breeding, Ministry of Agriculture, College of Animal Science and Veterinary Medicine, Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan 430070, China
Deng Chang-Yan
Affiliation:
Key Laboratory of Swine Genetics and Breeding, Ministry of Agriculture, College of Animal Science and Veterinary Medicine, Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan 430070, China
Jiang Si-Wen
Affiliation:
Key Laboratory of Swine Genetics and Breeding, Ministry of Agriculture, College of Animal Science and Veterinary Medicine, Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan 430070, China
Lei Ming-Gang
Affiliation:
Key Laboratory of Swine Genetics and Breeding, Ministry of Agriculture, College of Animal Science and Veterinary Medicine, Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan 430070, China
Zuo Bo
Affiliation:
Key Laboratory of Swine Genetics and Breeding, Ministry of Agriculture, College of Animal Science and Veterinary Medicine, Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan 430070, China
Xu De-Qun
Affiliation:
Key Laboratory of Swine Genetics and Breeding, Ministry of Agriculture, College of Animal Science and Veterinary Medicine, Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan 430070, China
Li Jia-Lian
Affiliation:
Key Laboratory of Swine Genetics and Breeding, Ministry of Agriculture, College of Animal Science and Veterinary Medicine, Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan 430070, China
Li Feng-E
Affiliation:
Key Laboratory of Swine Genetics and Breeding, Ministry of Agriculture, College of Animal Science and Veterinary Medicine, Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan 430070, China
Zheng Rong
Affiliation:
Key Laboratory of Swine Genetics and Breeding, Ministry of Agriculture, College of Animal Science and Veterinary Medicine, Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan 430070, China
*
*Corresponding author. E-mail: [email protected]

Abstract

The molecular genetic characteristics were evaluated, and the genetic effects of marker loci on heterosis of three traits (birth weight, BWT; average daily gain, ADG; and feed and meat ratio, FMR) were analysed in the experimental pig populations: Yorkshire (Y, n=34), Landrace (L, n=46) and Meishan (M, n=55); Yorkshire×Landrace (YL, n=32) and its reciprocal (LY, n=36), Yorkshire×Meishan (YM, n=82) and its reciprocal (MY, n=47), by 39 microsatellite markers selected from pig chromosomes SSC4, 6, 7, 8 and 13. The results indicated that observed alleles ranged from 2 to 6, average 4.13, observed heterozygosity varied from 0.39 (Y) to 0.58 (YM+MY) and average polymorphism information content (PIC) varied from 0.33 (Y) to 0.5 (YM). There were two loci (sw2155 and sw1037) at which the alleles were fixed in Y and L, and there were three loci (sw2409, sw2454 and sw1691) at which the alleles were fixed in M. The results from heterozygosity and kinship analysis revealed an intrinsic genetic relationship among the seven populations. Furthermore, the results on genetic effect analysis indicate that several marker loci had a significant effect on heterosis of the three traits in the two different F1 crossbred populations (P⩽0.01), for example s0161, swr1130 and sw1856 for BWT, sw1856 and swr2036 for ADG, and sw1302 and swr2036 for FMR. The significant marker loci implied a deep genetic relationship between molecular marker loci and heterosis.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
China Agricultural University and Cambridge University Press 2006

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bidanel, JP and Rothschild, M (2002) Current status of quantitative trait locus mapping in pigs. Pig News and Information 23(2): 39N54N.Google Scholar
Bostein, D, White, RL, Skolnick, M and Davis, RW (1980) Construction of a genetic linkage map in man using restriction fragment length polymorphisms. American Journal of Human Genetics 32: 314331.Google Scholar
Dieringer, D and Schlötterer, C (2003) Microsatellite Analyzer (MSA) – a platform independent analysis tool for large microsatellite data sets. Molecular Ecology Notes 3: 167169.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Laval, G, Iannuccelli, N, Legault, C, et al. (2000) Genetic diversity of eleven European pig breeds. Genetic Selection Evolution 32: 187203.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Li, SJ, Yang, SH, Zhao, SH, et al. (2004) Genetic diversity analyses of 10 indigenous Chinese pig populations based on 20 microsatellites. Journal of Animal Science 82: 368374.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nei, M, Tajima, F and Tateno, Y (1983) Accuracy of estimated phylogenetic trees from molecular data. Journal of Molecular Evolution 19: 153170.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Reif, JC, Melchinger, AE, Xia, XC, et al. (2003) Genetic distance based on simple sequence repeats and heterosis in tropical maize population. Crop Science 43: 12751282.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rohrer, GA (2000) Identification of quantitative trait loci affecting birth characters and accumulation of backfat and weight in a Meishan–White Composite resource population. Journal of Animal Science 78: 25472553.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Saitou, N and Nei, M (1987) The neighbor-joining method: a new method for reconstructing phylogenetic trees. Molecular Biology Evolution 4: 406425.Google Scholar
Sun, CQ, Jiang, TB, Fu, YC and Wang, XK (2002) Indica–japonica differentiation of paddy rice and its relationship with heterosis. Plant Breeding 121: 330337.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tatsuya, Ota ([email protected]) of the Institute of Molecular Evolutionary Genetics and Pennsylvania State University 1993.Google Scholar
Tautz, D (1989) Hypervariability of simple sequences as a general source of polymorphic DNA markers. Nucleic Acids Research 17: 64636471.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wada, Y, Akita, T, Awata, T, et al. (2000) Quantitative trait loci (QTL) analysis in a Meishan×Gottingen cross population. Animal Genetics 31: 376384.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wu, XL, Xun, L and Fredholm, M (2001) Association of microsatellite genomic heterozygosity with inbred pig performance under successive inbreeding. Acta Genetic Sinica 28: 2028.Google ScholarPubMed
Zhang, GX, Wang, ZG, Sun, FZ, et al. (2003) Genetic diversity of microsatellite loci in fifty-six Chinese native pig breeds. Acta Genetica Sinica 30: 225233.Google ScholarPubMed
Zhang, JH, Xiong, YZ and Deng, CY (2005) Correlations of genetic heterozygosity and variance with heterosis in pig populations revealed by microsatellite DNA marker. Asian–Australian Journal of Animal Science 18(5): 620625.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhang, QF, Gao, YJ, Yang, SH, Ragab, RA, Saghai Maroof, MA and Li, ZB (1994) A diallel analysis of heterosis in elite hybrid rice based on RFLPs and microsatellite. Theoretical and Applied Genetics 89: 185192.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zuo, B, Xiong, YZ, Su, YH, Deng, CY, Zheng, R and Jiang, SW (2003) Mapping quantitative trait loci for meat quality on pig chromosomes 3, 4 and 7. Asian–Australian Journal of Animal Science 16: 320324.CrossRefGoogle Scholar