Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-ndw9j Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-10T05:12:09.384Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Separating Intervention from Regime Change: China's Diplomatic Innovations at the UN Security Council Regarding the Syria Crisis

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 June 2018

Courtney J. Fung*
Affiliation:
Department of Politics and Public Administration, University of Hong Kong. Email: [email protected]. ORCID ID: 0000-0001-6498-6006.

Abstract

China's response to the recent Syria crisis at the UN Security Council represents a crucial case in China's approach to intervention in that it breaks from China's recent practice of becoming more permissive regarding intervention. Instead, China actively worked to ensure that a firm line was drawn to separate intervention from foreign-imposed regime change. It did so by employing three diplomatic innovations: exercising multiple, successive vetoes; expanding discourse to delegitimize intervention as “regime change” by Western powers; and engaging in norm-shaping of the international community's “responsibility to protect” post-intervention. Together, these three innovations highlight China's desire to firmly separate the intervention norm from that of regime change. Using a variety of primary sources, the article also draws insights from interviews with foreign policy elites in Beijing, New York and New Delhi.

摘要

中国在联合国安理会就近年叙利亚危机的回应, 是中国干预取向的重要案例。在叙利亚的危机中, 中国采取有别于过往的作风, 在干预问题上变得比较宽松。中国积极地介入以确保在干预与政权更替之间有一条明确的界线, 其外交上的创新有三个方向: 行使多次及连续的否决权; 建立反对西方强国干预等同「政权更替」的论述; 以及参与规范国际社会在干预后的保护责任。这三项创新共同突显了中国愿意把干预的惯例与政权更替区分出来。本文使用各种一手资料, 以及引用了北京、纽约和新德里外交政策专家的见解。

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © SOAS University of London 2018 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abdenur, Adriana Erthal, and da Silva Gama, Carlos Frederico Pereira. 2015. “Triggering the norms cascade: Brazil's initiatives for curbing electronic espionage.” Global Governance 21(3), 455474.Google Scholar
Alden, Chris, and Large, Daniel. 2015. “On becoming a norms maker: Chinese foreign policy, norms evolution and the challenges of security in Africa.” The China Quarterly 221, 123142.Google Scholar
Alterman, Jon B. 2013. “A tale of two crises,” April, http://csis.org/files/publication/0413_MENC.pdf. Accessed 1 December 2016.Google Scholar
Benner, Thorsten. 2013. “Brazil as a norm entrepreneur: the ‘responsibility while protecting’ initiative.” Global Public Policy Institute, Berlin, Working Paper.Google Scholar
Bloomfield, Alan. 2015. “Norm antipreneurs and theorising resistance to normative change.” Review of International Studies 42(2), 310333.Google Scholar
Brockmeier, Sarah, Stuenkel, Oliver and Tourinho, Marcos. 2016. “The impact of the Libya intervention debates on norms of protection.” Global Society 30(1), 113133.Google Scholar
Butler, Jay. 2014. “Responsibility for regime change.” Columbia Law Review 114(3), 503581.Google Scholar
Byman, Daniel L. 2012. “Finish him: why the world needs to take out Bashar al-Assad now,” 2 February, http://www.brookings.edu/research/opinions/2012/02/02-syria-assad-byman.Google Scholar
Chen, Zheng. 2016. “China debates the non-interference principle.” The Chinese Journal of International Politics 9(3), 349374.Google Scholar
Chin, Gregory, and Thakur, Ramesh. 2010. “Will China change the rules of global order?The Washington Quarterly 33(4), 119138.Google Scholar
Christensen, Thomas J. 2015. The China Challenge: Shaping the Choices of a Rising Power. New York: W.W. Norton and Company.Google Scholar
Columbia Global Policy Initiative. 2015. Responsibility while Protecting: Implementation and the Future of the Responsibility to Protect. New York: Columbia Global Policy Initiative.Google Scholar
Danin, Robert M. 2011. “Calling for regime change in Syria,” 18 August, http://www.cfr.org/syria/calling-regime-change-syria/p25677. Accessed 18 October 2016.Google Scholar
Davis, Jonathan E. 2011. “From ideology to pragmatism: China's position on humanitarian intervention in the post-Cold War era.” Vanderbilt Journal of Transnational Law 44(2), 217283.Google Scholar
Doran, Michael. 2014. “Pursue regime change in Syria,” 23 January, http://www.brookings.edu/research/papers/2014/01/regime-change-syria-doran. Accessed 18 October 2016.Google Scholar
Doran, Michael, and Shaikh, Salman. 2011. “Getting serious in Syria,” 29 July, https://www.brookings.edu/articles/getting-serious-in-syria/. Accessed 19 October 2016.Google Scholar
Duchâtel, Mathieu, Bräuner, Oliver and Zhou, Hang. 2014. “Projecting China's overseas interests: the slow shift away from non-interference,” June, http://books.sipri.org/files/PP/SIPRIPP41.pdf. Accessed on 22 February 2017.Google Scholar
Eckstein, Harry. 1975. “Case studies in political science.” In Greenstein, Fred I. and Polsby, Nelson W. (eds.), Handbook of Political Science. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley, 78137.Google Scholar
Evans, Gareth, Thakur, Ramesh and Pape, Robert A.. 2013. “Correspondence: humanitarian intervention and the responsibility to protect.” International Security 37(4), 199214.Google Scholar
Finnemore, Martha. 2003. The Purpose of Intervention: Changing Beliefs about the Use of Force. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Foot, Rosemary. 2014. “‘Doing some things’ in the Xi Jinping era: the United Nations as China's venue of choice.” International Affairs 90(5), 10851100.Google Scholar
Foot, Rosemary, and Inboden, Rana Siu. 2014. “China's influence on Asian states during the creation of the UN Human Rights Council: 2005–2007.” Asian Survey 54(5), 849868.Google Scholar
Foreign & Commonwealth Office and William Hague. 2011. “Syria: foreign secretary comments on situation in Hama,” 5 July, https://www.gov.uk/government/news/syria-foreign-secretary-comments-on-situation-in-hama. Accessed 19 October 2016.Google Scholar
Foreign & Commonwealth Office and William Hague. 2012. “Foreign secretary statement to parliament on the crisis in Syria,” 11 June, https://www.gov.uk/government/news/foreign-secretary-statement-to-parliament-on-the-crisis-in-syria. Accessed 19 October 2016.Google Scholar
France Diplomatie. 2011. “Entretien du Président de La République, Nicolas Sarkozy, avec l'hebdomadaire ‘L'Express’,” 4 May, http://basedoc.diplomatie.gouv.fr/exl-doc/EPI00049692.pdf. Accessed 31 October 2016.Google Scholar
France Diplomatie. 2012a. “Entretien du ministre des Affaires étrangères, M. Laurent Fabius, avec ‘France Inter’: Extraits, Paris, 29 août 2012,” 29 August, http://basedoc.diplomatie.gouv.fr/exl-doc/EPJ00061503.pdf. Accessed 31 October 2016.Google Scholar
France Diplomatie. 2012b. “Syrie – Entretien du ministre des Affaires étrangères, M. Laurent Fabius, avec ‘BFMTV’, ‘Europe 1’, ‘RFI’, ‘France Info’, ‘RTL’ et ‘FranceONU TV’: New York, 30 août 2012,” 30 August, http://basedoc.diplomatie.gouv.fr/exl-doc/EPJ00062705.pdf. Accessed 31 October 2016.Google Scholar
France in the United Kingdom. 2011. “Syria – joint statement by Nicolas Sarkozy, president of the Republic, Angela Merkel, chancellor of Germany, and David Cameron, prime minister of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland,” 18 August, http://www.ambafrance-uk.org/French-British-and-German-leaders. Accessed 5 October 2016.Google Scholar
Fung, Courtney J. 2016a. “China and the responsibility to protect: from opposition to advocacy.” Peace Brief 205, 15.Google Scholar
Fung, Courtney J. 2016b. “Explaining China's deployment to UN peacekeeping operations.” International Relations of the Asia-Pacific 16(3), 409441.Google Scholar
Fung, Courtney J. 2016c. “Global south solidarity? China, regional organisations and intervention in the Libyan and Syrian civil wars.” Third World Quarterly 37(1), 3350.Google Scholar
Garwood-Gowers, Andrew. 2016. “China's ‘responsible protection’ concept: re-interpreting the responsibility to protect (R2P) and military intervention for humanitarian purposes.” Asian Journal of International Law 6(1), 89118.Google Scholar
George, Alexander L., and Bennett, Andrew. 2005. Case Studies and Theory Development in the Social Sciences. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Gerring, John. 2007. “Is there a (viable) crucial-case method?Comparative Political Studies 40(3), 231253.Google Scholar
Indyk, Martin S. 2011. “Obama's belated Syria hard line,” 18 August, https://www.brookings.edu/opinions/obamas-belated-syria-hard-line/. Accessed 19 October 2016.Google Scholar
Institute of Strategic and International Studies (ISIS) Malaysia. 2012. “China's Strategic vision and regional security in the Asia-Pacific – remarks by HE Ambassador Tong Xiaolong at the 26th Asia-Pacific Roundtable, Kuala Lumpur,” 28 May, http://www.isis.org.my/files/2012/26APR/PS2_Tong_Xiaoling.pdf. Accessed 29 July 2016.Google Scholar
International Crisis Group. 2012. “Syria's mutating conflict,” 1 August, https://www.crisisgroup.org/middle-east-north-africa/eastern-mediterranean/syria/syria-s-mutating-conflict. Accessed 18 October 2016.Google Scholar
Jaganathan, Madhan Mohan, and Kurtz, Gerrit. 2014. “Singing the tune of sovereignty? India and the responsibility to protect.” Conflict, Security & Development 14(4), 461487.Google Scholar
Johnson, Adrian, and Mueen, Saqeb (eds.). 2012. Short War, Long Shadow: The Political and Military Legacies of the 2011 Libya Campaign. London: RUSI Publications, Whitehall Report.Google Scholar
Kaufmann, Daniel. 2012. “Russia and China leadership props up Syria's Assad,” 6 February, https://www.brookings.edu/blog/up-front/2012/02/06/russia-and-china-leadership-props-up-syrias-assad/.Google Scholar
Kerry, John. 2013. “Remarks with French foreign minister Laurent Fabius and UK foreign secretary William Hague,” US Department of State, 16 September, http://www.state.gov/secretary/remarks/2013/09/214266.htm. Accessed 19 October 2016.Google Scholar
Kinninmont, Jane. 2013. “Syria: UK must focus on diplomacy,” 1 September, https://www.chathamhouse.org/media/comment/view/194051. Accessed 18 October 2016.Google Scholar
Lieberthal, Kenneth, and Wang, Jisi. 2012. Addressing US–China Strategic Distrust. Washington, DC: Brookings, The John L. Thornton China Center Monograph Series No. 4.Google Scholar
Lindsay, Jon R. 2015. “The impact of China on cybersecurity: fiction and friction.” International Security 39(3), 747.Google Scholar
Litwak, Robert S. 2000. Rogue States and US Foreign Policy: Containment after the Cold War. Washington, DC: Woodrow Wilson Center Press.Google Scholar
Litwak, Robert S. 2007. Regime Change: US Strategy through the Prism of 9/11. Washington, DC: Woodrow Wilson Center Press.Google Scholar
Litwak, Robert S. 2012. Outlier States: American Strategies to Change, Contain, or Engage Regime. Washington, DC: Woodrow Wilson Center Press.Google Scholar
Liu, Tiewa. 2012. “China and responsibility to protect: maintenance and change of its policy for intervention.” The Pacific Review 25(1), 153173.Google Scholar
Liu, Tiewa, and Zhang, Haibin. 2014. “Debates in China about the responsibility to protect as a developing international norm: a general assessment.” Conflict, Security and Development 14(4), 403447.Google Scholar
Lo, Nigel, Hashimoto, Barry and Reiter, Dan. 2008. “Ensuring peace: foreign-imposed regime change and postwar peace duration, 1914–2001.” International Organization 62(4), 717736.Google Scholar
Murdock, Clark A. 2013. “What has Syria taught us about the right time to use force?” In Cohen, Craig, Hicks, Kathleen and Gabel, Josiane (eds.), 2014 Global Forecast: US Security Policy at a Crossroads. Washington, DC: Center for Strategic and International Studies with Rowman and Littlefield, 1315.Google Scholar
Office of the Press Secretary of the White House. 2011. “Remarks by the president on the Middle East and North Africa,” 19 May, https://www.whitehouse.gov/the-press-office/2011/05/19/remarks-president-middle-east-and-north-africa. Accessed 5 October 2016.Google Scholar
O'Hanlon, Michael E. 2011. “Four military options in Syria,” 30 August, http://www.brookings.edu/research/opinions/2011/08/30-syria-ohanlon. Accessed 19 October 2016.Google Scholar
Owen, John M. 2010. The Clash of Ideas in World Politics: Transnational Networks, States, and Regime Change, 1510–2010. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Permanent Mission of the People's Republic of China to the United Nations. 2012a. “Statement by Ambassador Li Baodong, permanent representative of China to the United Nations, at the Security Council Briefing on the situation in Syria,” 31 January, http://www.china-un.org/eng/hyyfy/t930411.htm. Accessed 31 October 2016.Google Scholar
Permanent Mission of the People's Republic of China to the United Nations. 2012b. “Explanation of vote by Ambassador Li Baodong after vote on draft resolution on Syria tabled by the United Kingdom,” 19 July, http://wcm.fmprc.gov.cn/preview/ce/cefr/fra/xnyfgk/t953752.htm?randid=0.8791840181675125. Accessed 31 October 2016.Google Scholar
Permanent Mission of the People's Republic of China to the United Nations. 2014. “Explanatory remarks by Ambassador Wang Min after Security Council voting on draft resolution on the referral of the situation of the Syrian Arab Republic to the International Criminal Court,” 22 May, http://www.china-un.org/eng/chinaandun/securitycouncil/regionalhotspots/asia/yz/t1161566.htm. Accessed 31 October 2016.Google Scholar
Permanent Representatives of Costa Rica, Jordan, Liechtenstein, Singapore, and Switzerland to the United Nations. 2012. “Presentation of the S-5 Draft Resolution L.42 on the improvement of the working methods of the Security Council,” 4 April, http://responsibilitytoprotect.org/Working%20Methods%20reform%20-ambassadors%20statement%204%20April%202012%281%29.pdf. Accessed 28 June 2016.Google Scholar
Phillips, James. 2012. “Preparing for a post-Assad Syria,” 19 January, http://www.heritage.org/research/reports/2012/01/us-policy-for-a-post-assad-syria. Accessed 19 October 2016.Google Scholar
Phillips, Macon. 2011. “President Obama: ‘The future of Syria must be determined by its people, but President Bashar al-Assad is standing in their way’,” The White House, 18 August, https://www.whitehouse.gov/blog/2011/08/18/president-obama-future-syria-must-be-determined-its-people-president-bashar-al-assad. Accessed 5 October 2016.Google Scholar
Puri, Hardeep Singh. 2012. “Interview with Ambassador Hardeep Singh Puri,” R2P: The Next Decade Conference, 18 January, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OP7QOQ5Aqoo&feature=youtu.be. Accessed 23 April 2018.Google Scholar
Reisman, W. Michael. 2004. “Why regime change is (almost always) a bad idea.” American Journal of International Law 98(3), 516525.Google Scholar
Richardson, Courtney J. 2011. “A responsible power? China and the UN peacekeeping regime.” International Peacekeeping 18(3), 286297.Google Scholar
Roberts, Adam. 2006. “Transformative military occupation: applying the laws of war and human rights.” American Journal of International Law 100(3), 580622.Google Scholar
Roberts, David, and Stephens, Michael. 2012. “Bloody days ahead as the Assad regime is decapitated,” 19 July, https://rusi.org/commentary/bloody-days-ahead-assad-regime-decapitated. Accessed 19 October 2016.Google Scholar
Ruan, Zongze. 2012. “Responsible protection: building a safer world.” China International Studies 34, http://www.ciis.org.cn/english/2012-06/15/content_5090912.htm. Accessed 4 May 2018.Google Scholar
Sa'adah, Anne. 2006. “Regime change: lessons from Germany on justice, institution building, and democracy.” Journal of Conflict Resolution 50(3), 303323.Google Scholar
Snetkov, Aglaya, and Lanteigne, Marc. 2015. “‘The loud dissenter and its cautious partner’ – Russia, China, global governance and humanitarian intervention.” International Relations of the Asia-Pacific 15(1), 113146.Google Scholar
Sørensen, Camilla T.N. Forthcoming. “That is not intervention; that is interference with Chinese characteristics. New distinctions and approaches developing in the Chinese debate and foreign and security policy practice.” The China Quarterly (forthcoming).Google Scholar
Stephens, Michael. 2012. “Arguments for military intervention in Syria,” 8 February, https://rusi.org/commentary/arguments-military-intervention-syria. Accessed 19 October 2016.Google Scholar
Sun, Yun. 2012. “Syria: what China has learned from its Libya experience.” Asia Pacific Bulletin 152, https://www.eastwestcenter.org/sites/default/files/private/apb152_1.pdf.Google Scholar
Swaine, Michael D. 2012. “Chinese views of the Syrian conflict.” China Leadership Monitor 39, https://carnegieendowment.org/files/Swaine_CLM_39_091312_2.pdf.Google Scholar
Teitt, Sarah. 2009. “Assessing polemics, principles and practices: China and the responsibility to protect.” Global Responsibility to Protect 1(2), 208236.Google Scholar
Teitt, Sarah. 2011. “The responsibility to protect and China's peacekeeping policy.” International Peacekeeping 18(3), 298312.Google Scholar
United Nations General Assembly. 2012. “Resolution adopted by the General Assembly on 16 February 2012: the situation in Syrian Arab Republic” (A/RES/66/253), 21 February.Google Scholar
United Nations General Assembly and United Nations Security Council. 2013. “Letter dated 14 January 2013 from the chargé d'affaires a.i. of the permanent mission of Switzerland to the United Nations addressed to the secretary-general” (A/67/694–S/2013/19), 16 January.Google Scholar
United Nations Secretary-General. 2012. “Kofi Annan appointed joint special envoy of United Nations, League of Arab States on Syrian Crisis” (SG/SM/14124), 23 February.Google Scholar
United Nations Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon. 2013. “Secretary-general's remarks to Security Council open debate on the protection of civilians in armed conflict,” 12 February, https://www.un.org/sg/en/content/sg/statement/2013-02-12/secretary-generals-remarks-security-council-open-debate-protection. Accessed 29 May 2016.Google Scholar
United Nations Security Council. 1992a. “Resolution 770 (1992): adopted by the Security Council at its 3,106th meeting, on 13 August 1992” (S/RES/770).Google Scholar
United Nations Security Council. 1992b. “Resolution 776: adopted by the Security Council at its 3,114th meeting, on 14 September 1992” (S/RES/776).Google Scholar
United Nations Security Council. 1993. “Resolution 816 (1993): adopted by the Security Council at its 3,191st meeting, on 31 March 1993” (S/RES/816).Google Scholar
United Nations Security Council. 1994. “Resolution 929 (1994): adopted by the Security Council at its 3,392nd meeting, on 22 June 1994” (S/RES/929).Google Scholar
United Nations Security Council. 1997. “3,730th meeting” (S/PV.3730), 10 January.Google Scholar
United Nations Security Council. 1999. “Security Council fails to extend mandate of United Nations preventive deployment force in former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia” (SC/6648), 25 February.Google Scholar
United Nations Security Council. 2008. “5,933rd meeting” (S/PV.5933), 11 July.Google Scholar
United Nations Security Council. 2011a. “6,524th meeting” (S/PV.6524), 27 April.Google Scholar
United Nations Security Council. 2011b. “6,528th meeting” (S/PV.6528), 4 May.Google Scholar
United Nations Security Council. 2011c. “6,531st meeting” (S/PV.6531), 10 May.Google Scholar
United Nations Security Council. 2011d. “6,627th meeting” (S/PV.6627), 4 October.Google Scholar
United Nations Security Council. 2012a. “6,711th meeting” (S/PV.6711), 4 February.Google Scholar
United Nations Security Council. 2012b. “Bahrain, Colombia, Egypt, France, Germany, Jordan, Kuwait, Libya, Morocco, Oman, Portugal, Qatar, Saudi Arabia, Togo, Tunisia, Turkey, United Arab Emirates, United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland and United States of America: draft resolution” (S/2012/77), 4 February.Google Scholar
United Nations Security Council. 2012c. “Security Council press statement on Syria” (SC/10564), 1 March.Google Scholar
United Nations Security Council. 2012d. “6,734th meeting” (S.PV/6734), 12 March.Google Scholar
United Nations Security Council. 2012e. “Resolution 2042 (2012): adopted by the Security Council at its 6,751st meeting, on 14 April 2012” (S/RES/2042).Google Scholar
United Nations Security Council. 2012f. “Resolution 2043 (2012): adopted by the Security Council at its 6,756th meeting, on 21 April 2012” (S/RES/2043).Google Scholar
United Nations Security Council. 2012g. “Security Council press statement on terrorist attacks in Damascus” (SC/10643), 10 May.Google Scholar
United Nations Security Council. 2012h. “Security Council press statement on attacks in Syria” (SC/10658), 27 May.Google Scholar
United Nations Security Council. 2012i. “Security Council fails to adopt draft resolution on Syria that would have threatened sanctions, due to negative votes of China, Russian Federation” (SC/10714), 19 July.Google Scholar
United Nations Security Council. 2012j. “Resolution 2059 (2012): adopted by the Security Council at its 6,812th meeting, on 20 July 2012” (S/RES/2059).Google Scholar
United Nations Security Council. 2012k. “6,826th meeting” (S/PV.6826), 30 August.Google Scholar
United Nations Security Council. 2014a. “Draft resolution” (S/2014/348), 22 May.Google Scholar
United Nations Security Council. 2014b. “Referral of Syria to International Criminal Court fails as negative votes prevent Security Council from adopting draft resolution” (SC/11407), 22 May.Google Scholar
Van Evera, Stephen. 1997. Guide to Methods for Students of Political Science. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Wittes, Tamara Cofman, Doran, Michael, Byman, Daniel L., Hamid, Shadi and Riedel, Bruce. 2013. “Syria, the US, and arming the rebels: Assad's use of chemical weapons and Obama's red line,” 14 June, http://www.brookings.edu/blogs/up-front/posts/2013/06/14-syria-us-arming-rebels-assad-use-chemical-weapons-and-obamas-red-line. Accessed 19 October 2016.Google Scholar
Wuthnow, Joel. 2013. Chinese Diplomacy and the UN Security Council: Beyond the Veto. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Zhao, Lei. 2011. “Two pillars of China's global peace engagement strategy: UN Peacekeeping and international peacebuilding.” International Peacekeeping 18(3), 344362.Google Scholar
Zifcak, Spencer. 2012. “The responsibility to protect after Libya and Syria.” Melbourne Journal of International Law 13(1), 6096.Google Scholar