Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7fkt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-30T15:30:56.223Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Old Linkages, New Networks: The Globalization of Overseas Chinese Voluntary Associations and its Implications*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 February 2009

Hong Liu
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Together with Chinese schools and newspapers, voluntary associations (shetuan) have long been regarded as one of the “three pillars” of Overseas Chinese societies, playing an important role in the evolution of Chinese diaspora communities. As such they have been extensively studied and documented, and this broad range of works lays the foundation for our knowledge of the subject. The existing literature, however, seems predominantly concerned with shetuan's political and socio-cultural activities in domestic settings and within the national boundaries. Little attention has been paid to questions of why and how Chinese voluntary associations operate and function in a cross-national and inter-regional environment and what effects those transnational movements have had on the socio-economic conditions of qiaoxiang, the ancestral hometowns of the Chinese diaspora. Correspondingly, there has been insufficient appreciation of the intimate and institutionalized links between shetuan's increasing and conspicuous international presence and the flourishing Chinese business networks, often characterized as informal relationships based on personal and family ties.

Type
Research Article
Information
The China Quarterly , Volume 155 , September 1998 , pp. 588 - 609
Copyright
Copyright © The China Quarterly 1998

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. A voluntary association is defined as “any public, formally constituted, and non-commercial organisation of which membership is optional, within a particular society” (Gordon Marshall, Oxford Concise Dictionary of Sociology (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1994), p. 557).Google Scholar It should be remembered that Chinese voluntary associations differ from those in the West. As Gary Hamilton points out, “voluntary associations are clubs with members, with precise organizational boundaries, with some kind of governing body and specific purpose, and with written duties and responsibilities for the members. Chinese associations, however, are not so clear-cut as these, and are not so well defined and neatly bounded. Rather, these Chinese groups focus on the relationships that bind members into a common identity and that form a moral community out of which a sense of duty and obligation arises” (Gary, Hamilton, “Competition and organization: a reexamination of Chinese business practices,” Journal of Asian Business, Vol. 12, No. 1 (1996), p. 18)Google Scholar. See also Chen, Boliang, Zhongguo de hui yu she (Societies and Associations in China) (Hangzhou: Zhejiang renmin chubanshe, 1996) for a more detailed discussion on the role of shetuan in fostering group identity.Google Scholar

2. See Maurice, Freedman, “Immigrants and associations: Chinese in nineteenth century Singapore,” in William, Skinner (ed.), The Study of Chinese Society: Essays by Maurice Freedman (Stanford: Stanford University Press, 1979), pp. 61–83Google Scholar; Li, Minghuan, Dangdai haiwai huaren shetuan yanjiu (A Study on Contemporary Overseas Chinese Associations) (Xiamen: Xiamen daxue chubanshe, 1995)Google Scholar; Crissman, L. W., “The segmentary structure of urban Overseas Chinese communities,” Man, Vol. 2, pp. 185–204CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Ng Wing, Chung, “Urban Chinese social organisation: some unexplored aspects in huiguan development in Singapore, 1900–1941,” Modern Asian Studies, Vol. 26, No. 3 (1992), pp. 469–494Google Scholar. For a general critique of Overseas Chinese studies, see Aihwa, Ong and Donald, Nonini (eds.), Ungrounded Empires: The Cultural Politics of Modern Chinese Transnationalism (New York: Routledge, 1997)Google Scholar; and Ye, Chunrong, “Renleixue de haiwa ihuaren yanjiu: jianlun yi ge xin de fangxiang” (“Anthropological studies of the Overseas Chinese: towards a new direction”), Bulletin of the Institute of Ethnology, Academia Sinica, Vol. 75 (1994), pp. 171–201.Google Scholar

3. Ever after its first appearance in the late 19th century, the term “Overseas Chinese,” meaning Chinese sojourners, was subject to heated, sometimes politicized debates. Since the end of the Second World War, it has been justifiably criticized for its China-centric connotations and its ignorance of the fact that the majority of ethnic Chinese living outside of the PRC, Hong Kong and Taiwan have become citizens of their residing nations. It is therefore mistaken and problematic to continue to term these people as “Overseas Chinese.” See Wang, Gungwu, “The origin of hua-chiao,” in Wang, Gungwu, Community and Nation: Chinese, Southeast Asia and Australia (St Leonards, NSW): Allen and Unwin for the Asian Studies Association of Australia, 1992), pp. 1–10Google Scholar; and Leo, Suryadinata, “Ethnic Chinese in Southeast Asia: Overseas Chinese, Chinese overseas, or Southeast Asians?” in Suryadinata, Leo (ed.), Ethnic Chinese as Southeast Asians (Singapore: Institute of Southeast Asian Studies, 1997), pp. 1–24.Google Scholar

4. For example, Yuen-fong, Woon, “Social change and continuity in south China: Overseas Chinese and the Guan lineage of Kaiping county, 1949–87,” The China Quarterly, No. 118 (1989), pp. 324–344Google Scholar; and Elizabeth, Sinn, “Xin Xi Guxiang: a study of regional associations as a bonding mechanism in the Chinese diaspora. The Hong Kong experience,” Modern Asian Studies, Vol. 31, No. 2 (1997), pp. 375–397.Google Scholar

5. Writing in 1994, Mayfair Mei-hui, Yang reported that “it is very difficult to form voluntary associations in China.” See her Gifts, Favors, and Banquets: The Art of Social Relationships in China (Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 1994), p. 301Google Scholar. Although there are signs of certain types of rising associations, such as business associations in the city and the partially revived lineage associations in qiaoxiang, these are normally established or restored on the government's initiative and operate in a totally different environment from their overseas counterparts. With a few notable exceptions, they are not involved in the collective globalizing move led by Overseas Chinese voluntary associations. For an analysis of those new associations, see Jonathan, Unger, “Bridges: private business, the Chinese government and the rise of the new associations,” The China Quarterly, No. 147 (1996), pp. 795–819Google Scholar; Christopher Earl, Nevitt, “Private business associations in China: evidence of civil society or local state power?” China Journal, No. 36 (1996), pp. 25–46Google Scholar; and Yuen-fong, Woon, “Social change and continuity in south China.”Google Scholar For a fuller discussion of the distinctions between the state and societal forces in China and South-East Asia and some relevant literature, see Elizabeth J., Perry, “Trends in the study of Chinese politics: state-society relations,” The China Quarterly, No. 139 (1994), pp. 704–718Google Scholar; and Gary, Hawes and Hong, Liu, “Explaining the dynamics of the Southeast Asian political economy: state, society, and the search for economic growth,” World Politics, Vol. 45, No. 4 (1993), pp. 629–660.Google Scholar

6. On this issue, see the useful discussion in Li, Minghuan, “Transnational links among the Chinese in Europe: a study on European-wide Chinese voluntary associations,” in Benton, Gregor and Pieke, Frank N. (eds.), The Chinese in Europe (Basingstoke and New York: Macmillan Press and St. Martin's Press, 1998), pp. 21–42.Google Scholar

7.Michael, Kearney, “The local and the global: the anthropology of globalization and transnationalism,” Annual Review of Anthropology, Vol. 24 (1995), p. 548Google Scholar. On the theoretical aspects of the connections between globalization and migration/diasporas, see the stimulating analyses in Wang, Gungwu, “Migration history: some patterns revisited,”Google Scholar and Robin, Cohen, “Diasporas, the nation-state, and globalisation,” in Gungwu, Wang (ed.), Global History and Migrations (Boulder, CO, and Oxford: Westview Press, 1997), pp. 1–22, 117–144.Google Scholar

8.David, Harvey, The Condition of Postmodernity: An Enquiry into the Origins of Cultural Change (Oxford: Basil Blackwell, 1989)Google Scholar; and Arjun, Appadurai, “Global ethnoscapes: notes and queries for a transnational anthropology,” in Fox, Richard (ed.), Recapturing Anthropology: Working in the Present (Santa Fe, NM: School of American Research Press, 1991), pp. 191–210.Google Scholar

9.Chen, Wanfan, “Yingwen jiaoyuzhe yanzhong de zongxiang huiguan” (“Clan associations in the eyes of the English-educated”), in Zhonghui san nian (Three Years of the Singapore Federation of Chinese Clan Associations) (Singapore: Singapore Federation of Chinese Clan Associations, 1989), pp. 50–52.Google Scholar

10. This paper follows Samuel Huntington's definition of institutionalization as “the process by which organizations and procedures acquire value and stability.” Quoted in Karen L., Remmer, “Theoretical decay and theoretical development: the resurgence of institutional analysis,” World Politics, Vol. 50 (1997), p. 35.Google Scholar

11. The data are drawn from various special convention publications, clan association newsletters and contemporary newspapers. For some relevant information, see also Fang, Xiongpu and Xu, Zhenli, Haiwai qiaotuan xunzong (In Quest of Overseas Chinese Associations) (Beijing: Zhongguo huaqiao chubanshe, 1995); pp. 265–325Google Scholar; and Li, Minghuan, A Study on Contemporary Overseas Chinese Associations, pp. 386–410.Google Scholar

12.Raphael, Pura, “A breed apart: stamina and success mark Fuzhou Chinese diaspora,” Asian Wall Street Journal, 8 06 1994.Google Scholar

13.Yuen-fong, Woon, “Social change and continuity,” p. 337.Google Scholar

14. For a useful analysis of the principles of Chinese kinship, see James L., Watson, ,Chinese kinship reconsidered: anthropological perspectives on historical research,” The China Quarterly, No. 92 (1982), pp. 589–622.Google Scholar

15.Ling Liong, Sik, The Malaysian Chinese towards Vision 2020 (Petaling Jaya: Pelanduk Publications, 1995), p. 117.Google Scholar

16.Thomas Tsu, Wee Tan, “Political modernisation and traditional Chinese voluntary associations: a Singapore case study,” Southeast Asian Journal of Social Science, Vol. 13, No. 2 (1985), pp. 67–79.Google Scholar

17.Bryna, Goodman, Native Place, City, and Nation: Regional Networks and Identities in Shanghai, 1853–1937 (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1996)Google Scholar; Cheng, Lim-Keak, Social Change and the Chinese in Singapore (Singapore: Singapore University Press, 1985)Google Scholar; Yao, Souchou, “Why Chinese voluntary associations: structure or function?” Journal of the South Seas Society, Vol. 39 (1984), pp. 75–99Google Scholar; Rupert, Hodder, Merchant Princes of the East: Cultural Delusions, Economic Success and the Overseas Chinese in Southeast Asia (Chichester: John Wiley and Sons, 1996), pp. 137–186Google Scholar; and Edgar, Wickberg, “Overseas Chinese adaptive organizations, past and present,” in Skeldon, Ronald (ed.), Reluctant Exiles? Migration from Hong Kong and the New Overseas Chinese (Hong Kong: Hong Kong University Press, 1994), pp. 68–84.Google Scholar

18.Wang Tai, Peng, The Origins of Chinese Kongsi (Petaling Jaya: Pelanduk Publications, 1995), pp. 109–148Google Scholar; Liao, Chiyang, “Zai Nichi kashō no shakai soshiki to sona shōgyō nettowaku” (“Chinese social organisations and trading networks in Japan: Fujian Clan Association of Nagasaki, 1860–1950s”), Tōyō bunka kenkyu kiyo (Bulletin of Studies in Oriental Culture), No. 134 (1997), pp. 109–173Google Scholar. (I am grateful to Miho Goda for help with the Japanese sources quoted in this article.) See also Hong, Liu, “Think locally, act regionally: the Singapore Chinese Chamber of Commerce and Industry as an institutional nexus of Asian Chinese business networks,” paper presented at the international workshop on “Asian Business Networks,” National University of Singapore, 31 –1 04 1998.Google Scholar

19. There are a number of important studies highlighting the cross-national nature of pre-1980 Chinese business activities. See, for example, Ruth, McVey, “The materialization of the Southeast Asian entrepreneur,” in McVey, Ruth (ed.), Southeast Asian Capitalists (Ithaca: Cornell University Southeast Asian Program, 1992), pp. 7–34Google Scholar; Christine, Dobbin, Asian Entrepreneurial Minorities: Conjoint Communities in the Making of the World-Economy, 1570–1940 (Richmond, Surrey: Curzon, 1996)Google Scholar; Anthony, Reid (ed.), Sojourners and Settlers: Histories of Southeast Asia and the Chinese (St Leonards, NSW: Asian Studies Association of Australia in association with Allen and Unwin, 1996)Google Scholar; and Aihwa, Ong and Donald, Nonini (eds), Ungrounded Empires.Google Scholar

20. Personal interview with Soon Peng Yam. See also Hong, Liu, “The Singapore Chinese Chamber of Commerce and Industry and Singapore-Malaysian economic interactions: a case study of regional interdependence.” Paper presented at the international conference, “Chinese Populations in Contemporary Southeast Asian Societies: Regional Interdependence and International Influence,” University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, 10–12 03 1997.Google Scholar

21.Yuan, , No. 3 (1997), pp. 46–48Google Scholar; Sinn, , “Xin Xi Guxiang,” p. 396.Google Scholar

22. See Chinben, , “Chinese organizations and ethnic identity in the Philippines,” in Cushman, Jennifer and Gungwu, Wang (eds.), Changing Identities of the Southeast Asian Chinese since World War II (Hong Kong: Hong Kong University Press, 1988), pp. 319–334Google Scholar; and Hodder, , Merchant Princes, pp. 146–151.Google Scholar

23.Rong, qing (Newsletter of the International Federation of Fuqing Clans), No. 2 (1989), p. 3.Google Scholar

24.Pierre, Bourdieu, “Social space and symbolic power,” Sociological Theory, Vol. 7, No. 1 (1989), p. 22.Google Scholar

25. Personal interviews with Tong Djoe; Li, Hongjie (ed.), Minji zhuming huaren fengcai lu (Anxi juan) (Profiles of Prominent Fujianese Overseas Chinese (Anxi volume)) (Fuzhou: Fujian renmin chubanshe, 1997), pp. 1–7Google Scholar. See also Moebanoe, Moera and Eddy, Suprapto, “Om Tong, pelobi ulung dan pengusaha serbauntung” (“Mr. Tong, a skillful lobbyist and ultra-successful entrepreneur”), in Kontan: Mingguan Ekonomi and Bisnis (Cash: Economy and Business Weekly) Vol. 1, No. 27 (1997), pp. 10, 14–15Google Scholar; and Eiji, Oshita, “Tong Djoe: Indonesia's political entrepreneur” [in Japanese], Sports Nippon, 6 05–11 06 1993, parts 1–35.Google Scholar

26.Sinchew jitpoh (Singapore Daily), 7 11 1992.Google Scholar

27.Rong, Qing(Newsletter of the International Federation of Fuqing Clans), No. 19 (1994), pp. 20–21Google Scholar; Guoji chaoxu (TIC [Teochew International Convention] Bulletin), Nos. 18/19 (1996), pp. 6–7.Google Scholar

28.James, Clifford, “Diasporas,” Cultural Anthropology, Vol. 9, No. 3 (1994), p. 306.Google Scholar

29.Guoji, chaoxu (TIC Bulletin), Nos. 18/19 (1996), p. 6Google Scholar; Zhao, Heman “Shijie Guangxi tongxianghui shilie” (“A short history of the World Guangxi Association”), Dongnanya zhonge (All-around Southeast Asia), No. 3 (1996), pp. 31–36.Google Scholar

30.From “Guest People” to Citizens: The Hakka Exhibition Brochure (Singapore, 1996), p. 1.Google Scholar

31.Sunday Times (Singapore), 17 04 1994.Google Scholar

32.John, Kao, “The worldwide web of Chinese business,” Harvard Business Review, 03/04 1993, pp. 24–36Google Scholar. See also Yu, Chukun, How Overseas Chinese Have Changed China [in Japanese] (Tokyo: The Press of PHP Institute, 1993), pp. 218–220.Google Scholar

33. Personal interview with Tong Keng-Meng.Google Scholar

34.Wang, Gungwu (ed.), Global History and MigrationsGoogle Scholar; Arif, Dirlik, “Critical reflections on ‘Chinese capitalism’ as paradigm,” Identities, Vol. 3, No. 3 (1997), pp. 303–330.Google Scholar

35.Kao, , “The worldwide web,” p. 32Google Scholar; “Beijing: fickle suitor of Overseas Chinese,” Nikkei Weekly, 5 06 1995, pp. 20–21Google Scholar; Friedrich, Wu and Sin Yue, Duk, “(Overseas) China, Inc.,” International Economy, 01/02 1995, p. 33.Google Scholar

36.Dan, Biers, “Staying the course: mainland upsets don't faze overseas-Chinese investors,” Asian Wall Street Journal, 19 07 1995, p. 11Google Scholar; Xie, Liangjun, “Role of Overseas Chinese vital for nation's economy,” China Daily, 20 12 1996.Google Scholar

37.Lianhe zaobao (United Morning News), (Singapore) 15 02 1998.Google Scholar

38.Straits Times, 18 January and 18 February 1998Google Scholar; Yazhou zhoukan (Asia Weekly), (Hong Kong) 19–25 January 1998, pp. 62–63.Google Scholar

39.China Daily, 20 12 1996.Google Scholar

40.Nanyang siang pau (Nanyang Commercial Daily), (Kuala Lumpur) 29 08 1997.Google Scholar

41.Yazhou zhoukan (Asia Weekly), 26 05 1997, p. 51.Google Scholar

42.Suisheng, Zhao, “Economic interdependence and political divergence: the emerging pattern of relations across the Taiwan Straits,” Journal of Contemporary China, Vol. 6, No. 15 (1997), p. 184Google Scholar. On the impact of the Beijing–Taipei competition on Overseas Chinese associations, see Li, Minghuan, A Study on Contemporary Overseas Chinese Association, pp. 90–100.Google Scholar

43.Wenhuibao, (Hong Kong) 25 05 1997.Google Scholar

44.Wang, Mingming, Shehui renleixue yu Zhongguo yanjiu (Social Anthropology and Sinological Studies) (Beijing: San nian shudian, 1997), pp. 300–307Google Scholar; Yuen-fong, Woon, “Social change and continuity.”Google Scholar

45. This phrase is drawn from the title of an essay from a 1995 issue of Fujian duiwai maoyi (Fujian Foreign Economic Relations and Trade).Google Scholar

46. On the changing policies of South-East Asian governments towards the ethnic Chinese, see Leo, Suryadinata (ed.), Ethnic Chinese as Southeast AsiansGoogle Scholar. It was reported that only about 1,000 of Malaysia's 5,762 shetuan were active, with the rest in the “state of hibernation” (Sinchew jitpoh (Singapore Daily), 14 April 1996). The similar downturn in Singapore shetuan's domestic influence during the 1970s and 1980s is mentioned in Cheng Lim, Keak, Social Change, and Thomas Tsu, Wee Tan, “Political modernisation.”Google Scholar

47.Second World Chinese Entrepreneurs Convention (Hong Kong: The Chinese General Chamber of Commerce, 1993), p. 88.Google Scholar

48.Cai, Liangqian, “Dierjie shijie Fujian tongxiang kenqin dahui” (“The second Fujianese world reunion”), Fujian xinwen (Fujian News), No. 7 (1996), p. 3.Google Scholar

49.Jamie, Mackie, “Overseas Chinese entrepreneurship,” Asian-Pacific Economic Literature, Vol. 6 (1992), pp. 41–64Google Scholar; and Gary, Hamilton (ed.), Asian Business Networks (Berlin: Waiter de Gruyter, 1996)Google Scholar. For a useful recent discussion, see Tong Chee, Kiong and Yong Pit, Kee, “Guanxi bases, Xinyong and Chinese business networks,” British Journal of Sociology, Vol. 49, No. 1 (1998), pp. 75–96.Google Scholar

50.Rong qing (Newsletter of the International Federation of Fuqing Clans), No. 22 (1994), p. 6.Google Scholar

51.Peter, Drucker, “The new superpower: the Overseas Chinese,” Asian Wall Street Journal, 21 12 1994, p. 8.Google Scholar

52.Mayfair, Yang, Gifts, Favors, and Banquets, p. 111.Google Scholar

53.Ambrose Yeo-chi, King, “Kuan-hsi and network building: a sociological interpretation,” in Wei-ming, Tu, (ed.), The Living Tree: The Changing Meaning of Being Chinese Today (Stanford: Stanford University Press, 1994), p. 116.Google Scholar

54.Lin, Tongchun, The Man Crossing the Bridge: An Autobiography of an Overseas Chinese through the Turbulent Years [in Japanese] (Kobe: Epic Press, 1997), pp. 147, 199. Personal interview with Lin Tongchun in Kobe.Google Scholar

55.Shoujie shijie Fujian tongxiang kengqing dahui shilu (Records of the First World Fukienese Associations' Convention) (Los Angeles: Southern-California Fukienese Association, 1994), p. 9.Google Scholar

56.Guoji Chaoxu (TIC Bulletin), Nos. 18/19 (1996), p. 6Google Scholar

57.Xinjiapo Fuqing huiguan sanqing jinian tekan (A Special Souvenir Publication for the Triple Celebrations of the Singapore Futsing [Fuqing] Association) (Singapore: Futsing Association, 1995), p. 3. In a personal interview with this author, Ling Lee Hua, president of the Singapore Fuzhou Association and a board member of Malaysia's Hock Hua Bank, also concedes that it is much easier to trust and do business with fellow county people.Google Scholar

58.First World Chinese Entrepreneurs Convention: A Global Network (Singapore: Singapore Chinese Chamber of Commerce and Industry, 1991), p. 19.Google Scholar

59.Business Times (Singapore), 8 12 1995Google Scholar; Lianhe zaobao (United Morning News), 12 08 1997. The site's address is http//wcbn.com.sgGoogle Scholar

60.Rong qing (Newsletter of the International Federation of Fuging Clans) No. 4 (1990), pp. 2–18Google Scholar; ibid. No. 29 (1996), pp. 4–7.Google Scholar

61.Lianhe zaobao (United Morning News), 22 11 1993.Google Scholar

62. Personal interview with Tong Keng-Meng.Google Scholar

63.Diyijie shijie Fuzhou shiyi tongxiang dahui (First International Foochow Conference–Republic of Singapore and Singapore Foochow [Fuzhou] Association 80th Anniversary) (Singapore: Foochow Association, 1990), p. 8.Google Scholar

64.Sinchew jitpoh (Singapore Daily), 8 10 1996.Google Scholar

65.Zhao, Heman, “A short history of the World Guangxi Association,” p. 34.Google Scholar

66.Xinjiapo Anxi huiguan chengli qishi zhounian ji diyijie shijie Anxi xiangqing lianyihui jinian tekan (Singapore Ann Kway [Anxi] Association 70th Anniversary in Conjunction with the World Ann Kway Convention) (Singapore: Singapore Anxi Clan Association, 1994), pp. 26, 51–52.Google Scholar

67.Lianhe zaobao (United Morning News), 7 12 1992.Google Scholar

68.Qi, Lian, “Zhongqin yimai, xiangyi qing nong” (“Same kinship, strong fellow feelings”), Huaren yuekan (Life Overseas), No. 2 (1995), pp. 21–24.Google Scholar

69.Tong xu (Newsletter of the Singapore Tung Ann District Guild), No. 13 (1996), p. 4Google Scholar; Lianhe zaobao, (United Morning News), 21 11 1996; and personal interview with Casey Kin-Chuan Lee.Google Scholar

70.Lianhe wanbao (United Evening News), 6 11 1994Google Scholar; and Lianhe zaobao (United Morning News) 5 12 1996.Google Scholar

71.Cai, Liangqian, “The second Fujianese world reunion,” pp. 4–5.Google Scholar

72.Anxi xiangxu (Hometown News from Anxi), 6 04 1994Google Scholar; Tong, Djoe, “Speech at the Opening Ceremony of the Third Anxi International Convention, Anxi, 15 November 1997” (typescript).Google Scholar

73.Lianhe zaobao (United Morning News), 20, 24 11 1997.Google Scholar

74.A Special Souvenir Publication for the Triple Celebrations of the Singapore Futsing [Fuqing] Association, p. 5.Google Scholar

75.Appadurai, , “Global ethnoscapes,” p. 193.Google Scholar

76.Sinchew jitpoh (Singapore Daily), 1 01 1996.Google Scholar

77.Seth, Faison, “Riady's China technique: local ties,” International Herald Tribune, 21 10 1996Google Scholar; Lianhe zaobao (United Morning News), 27 11 1992 and 27 01 1993Google Scholar. On the connections between Overseas Chinese capital and south China, see Constance, Lever-Tracy, David, Ip and Noel, Tracy, The Chinese Diaspora and Mainland China: An Emerging Economic Synergy (New York: St Martin's Press, 1996).Google Scholar

78.Aihwa, Ong, “Chinese modernities: narratives of nation and of capitalism;”Google Scholar and Aihwa, Ong and Donald, Nonini, “Toward a cultural politics of diaspora and transnationalism,” in Ong, and Nonini, (eds.), Ungrounded Empires, pp. 171–202, 323–332.Google Scholar

79.Kearney, , “The local and the global,” p. 557.Google Scholar

80.Nicole, Constable, “Introduction: what does it mean to be Hakka?” in Constable, Nicole (ed.), Guest People: Hakka Identity in China and Abroad (Seattle: University of Washington Press, 1996), p. 33.Google Scholar

81.Lianhe zaobao (United Morning News), 22 11 1987.Google Scholar

82.Rong qing (Newsletter of the International Federation of Fuqing Clans), No. 4 (1990), p. 2.Google Scholar

83.Wang, Gungwu, “Sojourning: the Chinese experience in Southeast Asia,” in Reid, Anthony (ed.), Sojourners and Settlers, pp. 1–14.Google Scholar

84. See for example the detailed discussions by clan representatives from South-East Asia and North America in Disijie guoji Chaotuan lianyihui baogaoshu (Proceedings of the Fourth Teochew [Chaozhou] International Convention) (Singapore: Singapore Teochew Poit Ip Huay Kuan, 1987); and Records of the First World Fukienese Associations Convention.Google Scholar

>85. Cited in Ling Liong, Sik, The Malaysian Chinese, towards Vision 2020, p. 27Google Scholar; Straits Times, (Singapore) 13 05 1993.Google Scholar

86.Theresa Chong, Carino, “The ethnic Chinese, the Philippine economy and China,” in Suryadinata, Leo (ed.), Southeast Asian Chinese and China: The Politico-Economic Dimension (Singapore: Times Academic Press, 1995), p. 226.Google Scholar

87.Straits Times, 27 01 1995Google Scholar; see also Barry, Wain, “Myths of the Overseas Chinese,” Asian Wall Street Journal, 10–11 12 1993Google Scholar; and Asian Wall Street Journal, 6 06 1997.Google Scholar

88.Tempo, (Jakarta) 27 11 1993, pp. 21–29Google Scholar; and Huaren yuekan (Life Overseas), No. 11 (1995), p. 19.Google Scholar

89.Lianhe zaobao (United Morning News), 23 11 1993. For a detailed discussion of the concept of “Greater China”Google Scholar and its implications, see David, Shambaugh (ed.), Greater China: The Next Superpower? (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1995)Google Scholar, especially Wang, Gungwu's essay, “Greater China and the Chinese overseas,” pp. 274–296.Google Scholar

90.Lianhe zaobao, 7 08 1994.Google Scholar

91.Lianhe zaobao, 16 05 1997.Google Scholar

92.Lianhe zaobao, 5 12 1995.Google Scholar

93.Linda, Low, “The Overseas Chinese connection: an ASEAN perspective,” Southeast Asian Journal of Social Science, Vol. 23, No. 2 (1995), pp. 89–119; and Lever-Tracy, Ip and Tracy, The Chinese Diaspora and Mainland China.Google Scholar

94. There are some marked generational differences among the attitudes of Chinese transnational entrepreneurs toward charitable and ethnicity-based community works. According to Ling Lee Hua, his father was willing to spend a large amount of money on Chinese education while himself leading a simple life. Ling himself has been supportive of local Chinese cultural and welfare works while taking recreational activities to enjoy life. The younger generation is generally unwilling to involve itself in Chinese community affairs, although they spend a great deal of money on personal recreation (personal interview with Ling Lee Hua). Tong Djoe, who served as the honorary chairman of the International Conference on Confucianism and World Civilisations (Singapore, June 1997) and helped the organizer with fund-raising, also related to me that the younger Overseas Chinese tycoons are generally reluctant to contribute.Google Scholar

95.Ng Wing, Chung, “Urban Chinese social organisation,” p. 470.Google Scholar

96. See for example, Hamilton, (ed.), Asian Business NetworksCrossRefGoogle Scholar; East Asia Analytical Unit, Overseas Chinese Business Networks in Asia (Canberra: Australian Department of Foreign Affairs and Trade, 1995)Google Scholar; Roger, Pyatt, “Business networks and dyad study: theory and practice in Southeast Asia,” Journal of Far Eastern Business, Vol. 1, No. 4 (1995), pp. 1–14Google Scholar; Jomo, K. S.et al. Southeast Asia's Misunderstood Miracle: Industrial Policy and Economic Development in Thailand, Malaysia and Indonesia (Boulder, CO, and Oxford: Westview Press, 1997), pp. 23–26Google Scholar. See also Cook, K. S. and Whitmeyer, J. M., “Two approaches to social structure: exchange theory and network analysis,” Annual Review of Sociology, Vol. 18 (1992), pp. 109–127.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

97.Edward, Chen and Gary, Hamilton, “Introduction: business groups and economic development,” in Hamilton, (ed.), Asian Business Networks, p. 6.Google Scholar

98.Gary, Hamilton, “Nineteenth century Chinese merchant associations: conspiracy or combination,” Ching-Shih Wen-ti (Problems in the Qing History), Vol. 3, No. 8 (1977), pp. 50–71Google Scholar; Hamilton, , “competition and organization,” pp. 15–17Google Scholar; Marco, Orru, Nicole W., Biggart, and Gary G., Hamilton, The Economic Organization of East Asian Capitalism (Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, 1997), pp. 51–53Google Scholar; and Goodman, , Native Place, City, and Nation.Google Scholar

99.Hawes, and Liu, , “Explaining the dynamics of the Southeast Asian political economy;”Google ScholarRemmer, , “Theoretical decay.”Google Scholar

100.Chen, Ta, Emigrant Communities in South China: A Study of Overseas Migration and its Influence on Standards of Living and Social Change (New York: AMS Press, 1998)Google Scholar; and Leo, Douw and Post, P. (eds.), South China: State, Culture and Social Change during the 20th Century (Amsterdam: Royal Netherlands Academy of Arts and Sciences, 1996)Google Scholar. For an alternative interpretation, see Hong, Liu, “Bridges across the seas: Chinese social organizations in South-East Asia and their links with qiaoxing,” paper presented at the international workshop, “Chinese Transnationalism: Cultural and Economic Dimensions,” Noordwijkerhout, The Netherlands, 25–26 June 1998.Google Scholar

101.Woon, Yuen-fong, “International links and the socioeconomic development of rural China: an emigrant community in Guangdong,” Modern China, Vol. 16, No. 2 (1990), pp. 139–172CrossRefGoogle Scholar. Woon, Yuen-fong's “Social change and continuity” describes the collective pressure exerted by the World Guan Clan Association and the World Longgang Association as more effective than individual efforts from abroad in bringing about lineage revival in Kaiping, Guangdong.Google Scholar

102.Wang, Gungwu, “Migration history,”Google Scholar and Cohen, , “Diasporas.”Google Scholar

103.Clifford, Geertz, The Interpretation of Cultures (New York: Basic Books, 1973), p. 259.Google Scholar

104.Appadurai, , “Global ethnoscapes,”Google Scholar and Kearney, , “The local and the global.”Google Scholar