Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-mlc7c Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-14T07:23:59.411Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Leadership in China's Urban Middle Class Protest: The Movement to Protect Homeowners' Rights in Beijing

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 May 2013

Zhengxu Wang ,
Long Sun ,
Liuqing Xu  and
Dragan Pavlićević
Zhengxu Wang
Affiliation:
University of Nottingham.
Long Sun*
Affiliation:
Renmin University of China.
Liuqing Xu
Affiliation:
Renmin University of China.
Dragan Pavlićević
Affiliation:
University of Nottingham.
*
Email: [email protected] (corresponding author).
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

In the last few years, the demands of homeowners in Chinese cities have gradually shifted away from economic rights and towards political ones. At the same time, alliances across different communities have emerged and vigorous attempts to form citywide solidarities have been made. In this process, a group of dedicated leaders has emerged, contributing greatly to the escalation of collective actions. This article focuses on a core group of Beijing activists behind the organization, expression and participation of homeowners' associations. Relying on data collected from interviews, documents and participatory observations conducted over a period of more than two years, we were able to pin down the socio-economic, social and political backgrounds of these leaders, as well as their attitudes, objectives and repertoire of actions. We describe leaders as falling into a two-by-two typology that is defined by a motivation dimension and an activeness dimension. Depending on his or her goals and approaches, a protest leader can be variously viewed as a political actionist, a frustrated changer, a double harvester or a tiger rider. These different types of leaders are all in one way or another promoting socio-political changes in China.

Keywords

homeowners' associationcivil movementrights defenceleadership in protesturban politicsChina
Type
Articles
Information
The China Quarterly , Volume 214 , June 2013 , pp. 411 - 431
Copyright
Copyright © The China Quarterly 2013 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Barber, James David. 1985. The Presidential Character: Predicting Performance in the White House (3rd ed.). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
Chen, Feng. 2008. “Worker leaders and framing factory-based resistance.” In O'Brien, Kevin J. (ed.), Popular Protest in China. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 88–107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chen, Xi. 2008. “Collective petitioning and institutional conversion.” In O'Brien, Kevin J. (ed.), Popular Protest in China. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 54–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fu, Hualing, and Cullen, Richard. 2008. “Weiquan (rights protection) lawyering in an authoritarian state: building a culture of public-interest lawyering.” The China Journal 59, 111–127.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
He, Junzhi. 2010. “Independent candidates in China's local people's congresses: a typology.” Journal of Contemporary China 19 (64), 311–333.Google Scholar
Ho, Peter, and Edmonds, Richard Louis (ed.). 2008. China's Embedded Activism: Opportunities and Constraints of a Social Movement. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Hurst, William, and O'Brien, Kevin J.. 2002. “China's contentious pensioners.” The China Quarterly 170, 345–360.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jenkins, J. Craig. 1983. “Resource mobilization theory and the study of social movements.” Annual Review of Sociology 9, 527–553.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kelly, David. 2006. “Citizen movements and China's public intellectuals in the Hu–Wen era.” Pacific Affairs 79 (2), 183–204.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Li, Lianjiang, and O'Brien, Kevin J.. 2008. “Protest leadership in rural China.” The China Quarterly 193, 1–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McCarthy, John D., and Zald, Mayer N.. 1977. “Resource mobilization and social movements: a partial theory.” American Journal of Sociology 82 (7), 1212–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
O'Brien, Kevin J., and Li, Lianjiang. 2005. “Popular contention and its impact in rural China.” Comparative Political Studies 38 (3), 235–259.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Perry, Elizabeth J. 2008. “Permanent rebellion? Continuities and discontinuities in Chinese protest.” In O'Brien, Kevin J. (ed.), Popular Protest in China. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 205–216.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Read, Benjamin L. 2003. “Democratizing the neighborhood? New private housing and homeowner self-organization in urban China.” The China Journal 49, 31–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Read, Benjamin L. 2007. “Inadvertent political reform via private associations: assessing homeowners' groups in new neighborhoods.” In Perry, Elizabeth J. and Goldman, Merle (eds.), Grassroots Political Reform in Contemporary China. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 149–173.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Saich, Tony, and Yang, Xuedong. 2003. “Innovation in China's local governance: ‘open recommendation and selection’.” Pacific Affairs 76 (2), 185–208.Google Scholar
Shi, Fayong, and Cai, Yongshun. 2006. “Disaggregating the state: networks and collective resistance in Shanghai.” The China Quarterly 186, 314–332.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tomba, Luigi. 2005. “Residential space and collective interest formation in Beijing's housing disputes.” The China Quarterly 184, 934–951.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yang, Guobin. 2005. “Environmental NGOs and institutional dynamics in China.” The China Quarterly 181, 46–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yu, Jianrong. 2007. Dangdai Zhongguo nongmin de weiquan kangzhen: Hunan Hengyang kaocha (Rights-Defence Resistance of Contemporary Chinese Peseants: Field Study in Hengyang, Hunan). Beijing: China Culture Press.Google Scholar
Zhu, Jiangang. 2004. “Not against the state, just protecting the residents' interests: a residents' movement in a Shanghai neighborhood.” Perspectives 5 (3), 1–16.Google Scholar