Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7czq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-30T13:16:29.287Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Unifying the Ancestral Land: The CCP's “Taiwan” Frames

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 July 2015

Anne-Marie Brady
Anne-Marie Brady*
Affiliation:
Department of Political Science, University of Canterbury, New Zealand. Email: [email protected].
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The Chinese Communist Party (CCP) government engages in a vast range of measures aimed at moulding global and domestic public opinion on the Taiwan issue. The Taiwan frames set by the CCP are not just aimed at shaping domestic Chinese public opinion and global discourse on Taiwan-related matters; they also succeed in curtailing the Republic of China (ROC) on Taiwan's global political and commercial space. The CCP's Taiwan frames are in direct conflict with the evolving “Taiwanese identity” frames coming out of the ROC. Moreover, they form part of the CCP government's wider ideological project to frame global concepts of “Chineseness,” which is aimed at combating other ideological challenges to that trope such as the Falun Gong movement, Tibetan independence activism and Chinese democracy groups. Yet, political, economic and technological changes in the PRC and globally suggest that, despite the CCP government's increased efforts, it may be harder than ever to ensure that the CCP frames have the desired effect.

摘要

中国共产党 (CCP) 政府就台湾问题在引导世界和国内公众舆论上实施了一系列的措施。中国共产党制定的台湾政策框架的目的, 不仅着眼于引导公众舆论和构建全球话语权, 而且在全球范围内限制中华民国 (ROC) 的政治和商业空间上也颇为成功。中国共产党的台湾政策框架直接抵制中华民国不断演变的 “台湾身份”。此外, 这些政策框架亦构成中国共产党政府更广泛的意识形态战略, 以展现一个全球的 “中国性” 概念; 旨在对抗其他意识形态方面的挑战, 如法轮功运动、西藏独立活动和中国民主运动团组。然而, 由于中国国内以及全球在政治、经济和技术方面的变化, 尽管中国共产党政府付诸更大的努力, 要保证这一政策框架取得预期的效果可能比以往都更加困难。

Keywords

TaiwanChinaframingmedia management台湾中国政策框架媒体管理
Type
Articles
Information
The China Quarterly , Volume 223 , September 2015 , pp. 787 - 806
Check for updates
Copyright
Copyright © The China Quarterly 2015 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bondes, Maria, and Heep, Sandra. 2012. “Change we can believe in: official framing and ideology in China's quest for legitimacy.” GIGA Working Paper No. 187, February, http://www.giga-hamburg.de/dl/download.php?d=/content/publikationen/pdf/wp187_bondes-heep.pdf. Accessed 23 May 2013.Google Scholar
Brady, Anne-Marie. 2003. Making the Foreign Serve China: Managing Foreigners in the People's Republic. Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield.Google Scholar
Brady, Anne-Marie. 2008. Marketing Dictatorship: Propaganda and Thought Work in Contemporary China. Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield.Google Scholar
Brady, Anne-Marie. 2009. “Mass persuasion as a means of legitimation and China's popular authoritarianism.” Journal of American Behavioral Science April, 434–457.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brady, Anne-Marie (ed.) 2012. China's Thought Management. Abingdon: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brady, Anne-Marie, and He, Yong. 2012. “Talking up the market: economic propaganda in contemporary China.” In Brady, Anne-Marie (ed.), China's Thought Management. Abingdon: Routledge, 36–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Han, Gang (Kevin). 2007. “Mainland China frames Taiwan: how China's news websites covered Taiwan's 2004 presidential election.” Asian Journal of Communication 17(1), 40–57.Google Scholar
Lin, Ji-Ping. 2012. “Tradition and progress: Taiwan's evolving migration reality.” Migration Policy Institute Profile, 24 January, http://www.migrationpolicy.org/article/tradition-and-progress-taiwans-evolving-migration-reality/. Accessed 25 May 2013.Google Scholar
Lutgard, Lams. 2006. “Shifting roles of GIO in Taiwanese international propaganda affairs and domestic control.” In Fell, Dafydd, Klöter, Henning and Chang, Bi-Yu (eds.), What Has Changed? Taiwan Before and After the Change in Ruling Parties. Wiesbarden: Harrasowitz Verlag, 243–264.Google Scholar
Nelson, Thomas, Oxley, Zoe M. and Clawson, Rosalee A.. 1997. “Towards a psychology of framing effects.” Political Behaviour 19(3), 221–246.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rawnsley, Gary. 2000a. “Selling Taiwan: diplomacy and propaganda.” Issues and Studies 36(3), 1–25.Google Scholar
Rawnsley, Gary. 2000b. Taiwan's Informal Diplomacy and Propaganda. Basingstoke, Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rawnsley, Gary. 2000c. “Taiwan's propaganda cold war: the offshore islands crises of 1954 and 1958.” Intelligence and National Security 14(4), 82–101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rawnsley, Gary. 2003. “Selling democracy: diplomacy, propaganda and democratisation in Taiwan.” China Perspectives 47(May–June), 1–9.Google Scholar
Rudolph, Jorg M. 1983. “Media coverage on Taiwan in the People's Republic of China.” Occasional Papers/Reprints Series in Contemporary Asian Studies No. 56, School of Law, University of Maryland.Google Scholar
Shangdong sheng. 1998. Shandong sheng duiwai xuanchuan gongzuo huibian ziliao 1992–1998 (Shandong Province Foreign Propaganda Work Reference Materials 1992–1998). Shandong: Shandongsheng xuanchuanbu.Google Scholar
Shao, Jing. 2011. “Meijie kuangjialun: xinwen chuanbo zhongkuangjia fenxi yanjiu de zhuangkuang, tedian yu zouxiang” (Media framing: the status, characteristics, and trends of framing analysis in news communication). Zhongguo meiti baodao 1, 1–14.Google Scholar
Snow, David A., and Benford, Robert D.. 1992. “Master frames and cycles of protest.” In Morris, Aldon D. and Mueller, Carol McClurg (eds.), Frontiers in Social Movement Theory. New Haven: Yale University Press, 133–155.Google Scholar
Thornton, Patricia M. 2002. “Framing dissent in contemporary China: irony, ambiguity and metonymy.” The China Quarterly 171, 661–681.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
To, James Jianh hua. 2012. “‘Hand-in-hand, heart-to-heart’: thought management and the overseas Chinese.” In Brady, Anne-Marie (ed.), China's Thought Management. Abingdon: Routledge, 164–182.Google Scholar
Xuanchuan wenhua zhengce fagui bianweihui (ed.). 1999. Xuanchuan wenhua zhengce fagui (Policies and Regulations on Propaganda and Culture). Kunming: Yunnan renmin chubanshe.Google Scholar
Zhonggong zhongyang xuanchuanbu zhengce fagui yanjiushi (ed.). 2005. Xuanchuan wenhua fagui huibian (A Compilation of Laws and Regulations on Propaganda and Culture). Beijing: Xuexi chubanshe.Google Scholar