Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-q99xh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T19:46:08.316Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Taiwan's Road to Marriage Equality: Politics of Legalizing Same-sex Marriage

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 December 2018

Ming-sho Ho*
Affiliation:
National Taiwan University. Email: [email protected].

Abstract

In May 2017, Taiwan's Constitutional Court reached a landmark decision that marriage should be opened to same-sex couples within two years, making Taiwan potentially the first country in Asia to realize marriage equality. How can we explain the success of the LGBT movement here? I argue that explanations based on cultural proclivity, public opinion, and linkages to world society, are inadequate. This article adopts a “political process” explanation by looking at changes in the political context and how they facilitate the movement for marriage equality. I maintain that electoral system reform in 2008, the eruption of the Sunflower Movement in 2014, and the electoral victory of the Democratic Progressive Party in 2016, stimulated Taiwan's LGBT mobilization, allowing it to eventually overcome opposition from the church-based countermovement.

摘要

在 2017 年 5 月, 台湾的大法官会议提出重大的释宪案, 同性伴侣应在两年内可以获得婚姻权利, 这使得台湾有可能成为亚洲第一个达成婚姻平权的国家。要如何解释性别少数运动的成功, 既有的关于文化亲近性、舆论支持与世界社会理论等解释,都是不够充份的。相对于此,这篇文章指出, 2008 年的选举制度改革、2014 年的太阳花运动、2016 年的民主进步党之胜选, 激化了性别少数的动员, 使得他们有办法克服来自于教会的反制运动。

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © SOAS University of London 2018 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Adamczyk, Amy, and Cheng, Yen-hsin Alice. 2015. “Explaining attitudes about homosexuality in Confucian and non-Confucian nations: is there a ‘cultural’ influence?Social Science Research 51, 276289.Google Scholar
Amenta, Edwin, Caren, Neal and Stobaugh, James E.. 2012. “Political reform and the historical trajectories in the twentieth century.” Social Forces 90(4), 10731100.Google Scholar
Andersen, Robert, and Fetner, Tina. 2008. “Economic inequality and intolerance: attitudes toward homosexuality in 35 democracies.” American Journal of Political Science 52(4), 942958.Google Scholar
Armstrong, Elizabeth A. 2005. “From struggle to settlement: the crystallization of a field of lesbian/gay organization in San Francisco.” In Davis, Gerald F. et al. (eds.), Social Movements and Organizational Theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 161187.Google Scholar
Badgett, M.V. Lee. 2009. When Gay People Get Married: What Happens When Societies Legalize Same-Sex Marriage. New York: New York University Press.Google Scholar
Bernstein, Mary. 2013. “Introduction.” In Bernstein, Mary and Taylor, Verta (eds.), The Marrying Kind? Debating Same-sex Marriage within the Lesbian and Gay Movement. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 135.Google Scholar
Bernstein, Mary. 2015. “Same-sex marriage and the future of the LGBT movement.” Gender and Society 29(3), 321337.Google Scholar
Bernstein, Mary, and Naples, Nancy A.. 2015. “Legal structuring and relationship recognition in the United States, Canada, and Australia.” American Sociological Review 80(6), 1226–49.Google Scholar
Bong, Youngshik D. 2008. “The gay rights movement in democratizing Korea.” Korean Studies 32, 86103.Google Scholar
Chen, Wan-chi, and Huang, Su-Jen. 2015. “Lifayuan wai de chunna: taiyanghua yundong jingzuozhe zhi renkou ji canyu tuxiang” (Outcry outside the legislature: a portrait of Sunflower Movement sit-in demonstrators). Taiwan shehuixue 30, 141179.Google Scholar
Cheng, Alice Yen-hsin, Wu, Fen-chieh Felice and Adamczyk, Amy. 2016. “Changing attitudes toward homosexuality in Taiwan, 1995–2012.” Chinese Sociological Review 48(4), 317345.Google Scholar
Chien, Tsu-chieh. 2012. “Cong tongxing hunyin dao duoyuan jiating” (From ‘same-sex marriage’ to ‘pluralistic family arrangements’). Taiwan renquan xuekan 1(3), 187201.Google Scholar
Chou, Wah-shan. 2000. Tongzhi: Politics of Same-sex Eroticism in Chinese Societies. New York: Haworth Press.Google Scholar
Cole, Michael J. 2017. “US hate group MassResistance behind anti-LGBT activities in Taiwan,” Taiwan Sentinel, 2 January, https://goo.gl/6Z8hxu. Accessed 16 November 2017.Google Scholar
Damm, Jens. 2005. “Same sex desire and society in Taiwan, 1970–1987.” China Quarterly 181, 6781.Google Scholar
Damm, Jens. 2011. “Discrimination and backlash against homosexual groups.” In Ngo, Tak-wing and Wang, Hong-zen (eds.), Politics of Difference in Taiwan. London: Routledge, 152180.Google Scholar
Egan, Patrick J., and Sherrill, Kenneth. 2005. “Marriage and the shifting priorities of a new generation of lesbians and gays.” PS: Political Science and Politics 38(2), 229232.Google Scholar
Encarnación, Omar G. 2016. Out of Periphery: Latin America's Gay Rights Revolution. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Fell, Dafydd, and Peng, Yen-wen. 2016. “The electoral fortunes of Taiwan's Green Party.” Japanese Journal of Political Science 17(1), 6383.Google Scholar
Fernández, Juan J., and Lutter, Mark. 2013. “Supranational cultural norms, domestic value orientations, and the diffusion of same-sex union rights in Europe, 1988–2009.” International Sociology 28(1), 102120.Google Scholar
Fetner, Tina. 2008. How the Religious Right Shaped Lesbian and Gay Activism. Minnesota: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
Frank, David John, Steven, A. Boutcher and Camp, Bayliss. 2009. “The reform of sodomy laws from a world society perspective.” In Barclay, Scott, Bernstein, Mary and Marshall, Anna-Maria (eds.), Queer Mobilizations: LGBT Activists Confront the Law. New York: NYU Press, 123141.Google Scholar
Fu, Yang-chih et al. 2016. Taiwan shehui bianqian jiben diaocha jihua: diqiqi diyici diaocha jihua zhixing baogao (Summary Report of Taiwan Social Change Survey: The First Year of the Seventh Round). Taipei: Academia Sinica Institute of Sociology.Google Scholar
Gamson, Josh. 1989. “Silence, death, and the invisible enemy.” Social Problems 36(4), 351367.Google Scholar
Gerhards, Jürgen. 2010. “Non-discrimination towards homosexuality: the European Union's policy and citizens’ attitudes towards homosexuality in 27 European countries.” International Sociology 25(1), 528.Google Scholar
Goldstone, Jack. A. 2004. “More social movements or fewer?Theory and Society 33, 333365.Google Scholar
Goodwin, Jeff. 2012. “Conclusion.” In Goodwin, Jeffrey and Jasper, James M. (eds.), Contention in Context: Political Opportunities and the Emergence of Protest. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press, 277300.Google Scholar
Hildebrandt, Timothy. 2011. “Same-sex marriage in China?Review of International Studies 37(3), 1313–33.Google Scholar
Hildebrandt, Timothy. 2012. “Development and division: the effect of transnational linkages and local politics on LGBT activism in China.” Journal of Contemporary China 21(77), 845862.Google Scholar
Ho, Josephine Chuen-juei. 2010. “Queer existence under global governance: a Taiwan exemplar.” Positions 18(2), 537554.Google Scholar
Ho, Ming-sho, and Huang, Chun-hao. 2017. “Movement parties in Taiwan (1987–2016): a political opportunity explanation.” Asian Survey 57(2), 343367.Google Scholar
Huang, Ke-hsien. 2017. “‘Culture wars’ in a globalized east.” Review of Religion and Chinese Society 4, 108136.Google Scholar
Jasper, James M. 2012. “Introduction.” In Goodwin, Jeffrey and Jasper, James M. (eds.), Contention in Context: Political Opportunities and the Emergence of Protest. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press, 133.Google Scholar
Kim, Hyun-Young Kwon, and Cho, John. 2011. “The Korean gay and lesbian movement.” In Shin, Gi-Wook, and Chang, Paul Y. (eds.), South Korean Social Movements: From Democracy to Civil Society. London: Routledge, 206223.Google Scholar
Kim, Nami. 2016. The Gendered Politics of the Korean Protestant Right. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Kollman, Kelly. 2007. “Same-sex unions: the globalization of an idea.” International Studies Quarterly 51(2), 329357.Google Scholar
Kriesi, Hanspeter. 2004. “Political context and opportunity.” In Snow, David A., Soule, Sarah A. and Kriesi, Hanspeter (eds.), The Blackwell Companion to Social Movements. Oxford: Oxford: Blackwell Press, 6790.Google Scholar
Kuan, Hsiao-wei. 2011. “Fan duotai yundong yu rengong liuchan fa lunshu.” (The anti-abortion movement and the discourses on abortion law). In Ho, Ming-sho and Lin, Hsiu-hsin (eds.), Shehui yundong de nian dai (The Era of Social Movements). Taipei: Socio, 215256.Google Scholar
Kuan, Hsiao-wei. Forthcoming. “LGBT rights in Taiwan: the interaction between movements and the law.” In Cohen, Jerome A., Alford, William P. and Lo, Chang-Fa (eds.), Taiwan and International Human Rights. New York: Springer.Google Scholar
Lai, Yu-lin. 2003. “Taiwan tongzhi yundong de jigou hua” (The institutionalization of Taiwan tongzhi movement). Nuxue xuezhi 15, 79114.Google Scholar
Lee, Yoonkyung. 2011. Militants or Partisans: Labor Unions and Democratic Politics in Korea and Taiwan. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Loftus, Jeni. 2001. “America's liberalization in attitudes toward homosexuality, 1973 to 1998.” American Sociological Review 66(5), 762782.Google Scholar
Mahoney, James. 2000. “Path dependency in historical sociology.” Theory and Society 29(4), 507548.Google Scholar
McAdam, Doug. 1982. Political Process and the Development of Black Insurgency 1930–1970. Chicago: Chicago University Press.Google Scholar
McAdam, Doug. 1996. “Conceptual origins, current problems, future directions.” In McAdam, Doug, McCarthy, John D. and Zald, Mayer N. (eds.), Comparative Perspectives on Social Movements. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2340.Google Scholar
Meyer, David S., and Minkoff, Debra C.. 2004. “Conceptualizing political opportunity.” Social Forces 82 (4), 1457–92.Google Scholar
Meyer, David S., and Staggenborg, Susan. 1996. “Movements, countermovements, and the structure of political opportunity.” American Journal of Sociology 101, 1628–60.Google Scholar
Rauhala, Emily. 2017. “In historic decision, Taiwanese court rules in favor of same-sex marriage,” Washington Post, 24 May, https://goo.gl/keEsqA. Accessed 15 November 2017.Google Scholar
Rich, Timothy. 2017. “Electoral paths and support for same-sex marriage legislation.” International Political Science Review 38(5), 563576.Google Scholar
Rom, Mark Carl. 2007. “Introduction.” In Rimmerman, Craig A. and Wilcox, Clyde (eds.), The Politics of Same-sex Marriage. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 138.Google Scholar
Shin, Kwang-Yeong. 2012. “The dilemmas of Korea's new democracy in an age of neoliberal globalisation.” Third World Quarterly 33(2), 293309.Google Scholar
Smith, Miriam. 2005. “The politics of same-sex marriage in Canada and the United States.” PS: Political Science and Politics 38(2), 225–28.Google Scholar
Soule, Sarah. 2004. “Going to the chapel? same-sex marriage bans in the United States, 1973–2000.” Social Problems 51(4), 453477.Google Scholar
Steger, Isabella, 2017. “Being a progressive politician in Korea doesn't stop you from being homophobic.” Quartz, 2 April, https://goo.gl/dNharH. Accessed 2 April 2018.Google Scholar
Tarrow, Sidney. 1996. “States and opportunities.” In McAdam, Doug, McCarthy, John D. and Zald, Mayer N. (eds.), Comparative Perspectives on Social Movements. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 4161.Google Scholar
Tilly, Charles. 1978. From Mobilization to Revolution. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.Google Scholar
Tilly, Charles, and Tarrow, Sidney. 2007. Contentious Politics. New York: Paradigm.Google Scholar
Yarbrough, Michael W. 2017. “Something old, something new: historicizing same-sex marriage within ongoing struggles over African marriage in South Africa.” Sexualities, https://doi.org/10.1177/1363460717718507. Accessed 2 April 2018.Google Scholar
Yi, Joseph, Jung, Gowoon and Philips, Joe. 2017. “Evangelical Christian discourse in south Korea on the LGBT.” Society 54(1), 2933.Google Scholar