Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-dh8gc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-08T08:05:10.616Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Policy Oscillations in the People's Republic of China: A Reply

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  17 February 2009

Edwin A. Winckler
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Professor Nathan's pungent essay raises important issues for the politics of development in general and for drawing comparative conclusions from the Chinese case in particular. His cleansing scepticism demolishes some positions which may be held by authors in the China field and reminds others that the unstated assumptions in their models need better articulation. However he goes too far. What needs to be re-established is that clear and modest formulations of short-term recurrence, interdependence among policies, and two-sided policy disagreement are not avoidable errors but indispensable heuristic devices in the conceptual repertoire of China watchers. In fact it would be a great disservice to stùdies of contemporary China and to comparative study of the Chinese case if Professor Nathan were allowed to succeed in his attempt to identify all such analyses with his reductio ad absurdum of some of them. Let us try to rescue the possibility of constructive social science modelling of the three principal issues Professor Nathan raises.

Type
Research Article
Information
The China Quarterly , Volume 68 , December 1976 , pp. 734 - 750
Copyright
Copyright © The China Quarterly 1976

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

* This article is a spin-off from joint research conducted by Professor G. William Skinner and myself under National Science Foundation Grant GS-33955. I thank Professor Skinner, and members of the Contemporary China Seminar at Columbia University, for comments on the original draft.

1. “Metamorphic” change involves “abrupt major transformations which sharply distinguish one period of organizational history from another.” See William H. Starbuck “ Organizational metamorphosis,” in Millman, R. W. and Hottenstein, M. P. (eds.), Promising research directions (Academy of Management, 1968), pp. 113–22,Google Scholar reprinted in Starbuck, W. H. (ed.), Organizational growth and development (Baltimore:Penguin, 1971), pp. 275–98.Google Scholar

2. Possibly the clearest example in the literature so far is Richard Suttmeier, “ Science policy shifts, organizational change and China's development,” China Quarterly (CQ), No. 62 (1975), pp. 207–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

3. Thus Alexander Eckstein, who Nathan quotes in conjunction with Skinner and Winckler as a cyclical theorist, has written probably the best short linear overview of Chinese economic development: “ Economic growth and change in China: A twenty-year perspective,” CQ No. 54 (1973), pp. 211–41.

4. Skinner, G. William and Winckler, Edwin A.. “ Compliance succession in rural Communist China: A cyclical theory.” In Etzioni, Amitai (ed.), A Sociological Reader on Complex Organizations (New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston, 1969, 2nd edit.), pp. 410–38.Google Scholar

5. Etzioni, Amitai, A Comparative Analysis of Complex Organizations (New York: Free Press, 1975.Google Scholar Revised and enlarged edit.). Drawing on James Thompson's typology of organizational technologies, the kinds of interdependence they create and the kinds of co-ordination strategies they require, the article also includes a parallel though less developed analysis of variations in task structure, information processing and performance criteria. Thompson, James, Organizations in action (New York: McGraw-Hill, 1967).Google Scholar

6. Schurmann, Franz. Ideology and Organization in Communist China (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1968, 2nd edit.).Google Scholar

7. Skinner and Winckler, “ Compliance succession,” pp. 414–15.

8. Ibid. p. 416.

9. In 1974, for example, the change in emphasis from mobilization to consolidation is reflected in the difference in tone between Wang Hung-wen's report at a central study class in January 1974 and Central Committee Document Number Twenty-one of July 1974. See Issues and Studies, Vol. XI, No. 1 (February 1975), pp. 94–105 and Vol. XI, No. 2 (January 1975), pp. 101–104, respectively.

10. The three “technical links” parallel the three forms of technology presented in Thompson, 1967.

11. Thompson, Organizations in Action, pp. 54–56.

12. Ibid. pp. 54–56.

13. For particularly clear examples see Forrester, Jay, Urban Dynamics (Cambridge: MIT Press, 1969).Google Scholar

14. Thompson Organizations in Action, pp. 54–56.

15. Lowi, Theodore, “American business, public policy, case studies, and political theory,” World Politics, Vol. XVI, No. 4 (July 1964).Google Scholar

16. Hirschmann, Albert O., “ The selection of problems and the function of ideology,” in Journeys Toward Progress (New York: Twentieth Century Fund, 1963), 1965 Anchor Book edition, pp. 301–309.Google Scholar

17. For the economic examples of these linkages discussed see Riskin, Carl, “ Workers' incentives in Chinese industry,” in China: A Reassessment of the Economy, compiled by the Joint Economic Committee, Congress of the United States (Washington, D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office, 1975), pp. 199–224.Google Scholar

18. The question of whether “ policy dualism” is likely to occur is pre-sumably analogous to the question of under what conditions policy-making is likely to be “ synoptic” or “ incremental.” See Lindblom, Charles E., The Intelligence of Democracy: Decision-Making Through Mutual Adjustment (New York: The Free Press, 1965).Google Scholar

19. For an interesting review of the use of left-right terminology in western political analysis, see Laponce, J. A., “ Spatial archetypes and political perceptions,” American Political Science Review, Vol. 69, No. 1 (March 1975), pp. 11–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

20. Eckstein, Alexander, “Economic fluctuations in Communist China's domestic development” in Ho, Ping-ti and Tsou, Tang (eds.), China in Crisis (Chicago: University of Chicago, 1968), Vol. I, pp. 691–729 and Skinner and Winckler, “ Compliance succession.”Google Scholar

21. Lampton, David M., “Health policy during the Great Leap Forward,” CQ, No. 60 (1974), pp. 668–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

22. For Etzioni's statement of the argument, see Etzioni, “A comparative analysis”; and for the application to China, see Skinner and Winckler, “ Compliance succession.”

23. For a defence of the “ critical ” role of ideology, see Wakeman, Frederic. “The use and abuse of ideology in the study of contemporary China,” CQ, No. 61 (March 1975), pp. 127–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

24. Lowi, “ American business.”

25. Ibid. p. 701, footnote 28.

26. Cyert, Richard and March, James G.. A Behavioral Theory of the Firm (Englewood, New Jersey: Prentice-Hall, 1963).Google Scholar

27. See for example Karnow, Stanley. Mao and China (New York: Viking Press, 1972), particularly pp. 261–75.Google Scholar