Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-g8jcs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T00:04:50.308Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Governmentality and Translation: Re-thinking the Cultural Politics of Lineage Landscapes in Contemporary Rural China

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 October 2020

Ningning Chen
Ningning Chen*
Affiliation:
Asia Research Institute, National University of Singapore. Email: [email protected].
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This paper explores the cultural politics of lineage landscapes in contemporary rural China. Drawing on a combined governmentality/translation approach and ethnographic fieldwork in rural Wenzhou, it examines how the state governs the production of lineage landscapes and how local lineages translate governmental technologies in complex ways. Empirical evidence reveals that the government develops diversified rationalities and modes of governance to direct the (re)construction of lineage landscapes. It is also found that local lineages are skilled at appropriating state discourses and practices as well as enrolling other (non-)human actors, thereby legitimizing their landscape projects of ancestral tombs and memorials. On the ground, they often displace state objectives with the production of their preferred landscape (for example, “chair” tombs). Respectful of ancestors, state agents sometimes turn a blind eye to local displacement; however, while encountering challenges from the higher-level government, they intensify regulation, but lineages still retain the capacity to negotiate with them. With sensitivity to the entanglement of diversified actors and their dynamic interactions, this paper underlines the multiplicity and contingency of state governance and societal responses. It also foregrounds the cultural politics of lineage landscapes as a process of translating governmental technologies characterized by continuous mobilization, displacement and negotiation in a heterogeneous network.

摘要

摘要

本文探讨当代中国农村宗族景观的文化政治。采用“治理术”和“翻译”为理论框架，文章分析了政府如何治理宗族景观的生产并探讨了农村宗族如何翻译政府的治理策略。基于温州农村的田野调研，本文揭示了当地政府采取了各种合理化策略和治理模式来规范宗族景观的重建。另外，此研究也表明温州农村宗族具有极大的能动性，既擅长挪用政府话语和实践并且吸纳其他人类和非人类行动者以此来合法化他们的景观建设项目。在实际建设过程中，他们往往违背政府意志而生产出他们想要的诸如“椅子坟”宗族景观。基于对祖先的敬畏，基层政府官员有时候对这些移置行为睁一只眼闭一只眼，但有时候在受到上级政府干预时又对这些行为加强管制。然而当地宗族仍积极地与政府各部门进行协商。总而言之，此研究让我们认识到政府与民间社会（宗族）关系的多样性和变动性，并对如何阐释宗族景观生产中的文化政治提供了新的理论视角。

Keywords

lineage landscapescultural politicsgovernmentalitytranslationactor-network theorysacred spacerural China宗族景观文化政治治理术翻译行动者网络理论神圣空间乡土中国
Type
Research Article
Information
The China Quarterly , Volume 247 , September 2021 , pp. 703 - 723
Check for updates
Copyright
Copyright © SOAS University of London, 2020

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Banister, Jeff M. 2007. “Stating space in modern Mexico.” Political Geography 26(4), 455–473.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Callon, Michel. 1986. “Some elements of a sociology of translation: domestication of the scallops and the fishermen of St Brieuc Bay.” In Law, John (ed.), Power, Action and Belief: A New Sociology of Knowledge? London: Routledge, 196–233.Google Scholar
Chan, Anita, Madsen, Richard and Unger, Jonathan. 2009. Chen Village: Revolution to Globalization. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Chao, Paul. 1983. Chinese Kinship. London: Kegan Paul International.Google Scholar
Chau, Adam Y. 2005. “The politics of legitimation and the revival of popular religion in Shaanbei, north-central China.” Modern China 31(2), 236–278.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chau, Adam Y. 2006. Miraculous Response: Doing Popular Religion in Contemporary China. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Chen, Ningning. 2016. “Governing rural culture: agency, space and the reproduction of ancestral temples in contemporary China.” Journal of Rural Studies 47, 141–152.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chen, Ningning. 2017. “Secularization, sacralization and the reproduction of sacred space: exploring the industrial use of ancestral temples in rural Wenzhou, China.” Social and Cultural Geography 18(4), 530–552.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cooke, Susette. 2009. “‘Religious work’: governing religion in reform-era China.” In Jeffreys, Elaine (ed.), China's Governmentalities: Governing Change, Changing Government. London: Routledge, 125–150.Google Scholar
Dean, Kenneth. 2003. “Local communal religion in contemporary south-east China.” The China Quarterly 174(6), 338–358.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dean, Mitchell. 1999. Governmentality: Power and Rule in Modern Society. London: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
Faure, David. 2007. Emperor and Ancestor: State and Lineage in South China. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Feng, Erkang, Chang, Jianjun, Zhu, Fenghan, Yan, Aimin and Liu, Min. 2009. Zhongguo zongzu de lishi (The History of Chinese Lineage). Shanghai: Shanghai People's Publishing House.Google Scholar
Feuchtwang, Stephan. 2000. “Religion as resistance.” In Perry, Elizabeth and Selden, Mark (eds.), Chinese Society: Change, Conflict and Resistance. London: Routledge, 161–177.Google Scholar
Freedman, Maurice. 1958. Lineage Organization in Southeastern China. London: Athlone Press.Google Scholar
Herbert-Cheshire, Lynda. 2003. “Translating policy: power and action in Australia's county towns.” Sociologia Ruralis 43, 454–473.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jeffreys, Elaine, and Sigley, Gary. 2009 “Governmentality, governance and China.” In Jeffreys, Elaine (ed.), China's Governmentalities: Governing Change, Changing Government. London: Routledge, 1–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jing, Jun. 1996. The Temple of Memories: History, Power, and Morality in a Chinese Village. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Jones, Rhys. 2012. “State encounters.” Environment and Planning D: Society and Space 30(5), 805–821.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kuah-Pearce, Khun E. 2011. Rebuilding the Ancestral Village: Singaporeans in China. Singapore: National University of Singapore Press.Google Scholar
Latour, Bruno. 1986. “The power of association.” In Law, John (ed.), Power, Action and Belief: A New Sociology of Knowledge? London: Routledge, 264–280.Google Scholar
Lee, Nick, and Brown, Steve. 1994. “Otherness and the actor network: the undiscovered continent.” American Behavioral Scientist 37(6), 772–790.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Li, Yidan. 2011. “Zongzu wenhua de dangdai bianqian yanjiu: yi Guangxi Huangyao zhen wei ge an” (Contemporary changes of the Chinese lineage culture: the case of Huangyao Town, Guangxi). MA diss., Guangxi Normal University.Google Scholar
Oakes, Tim. 2012. “Heritage as improvement: cultural display and contested governance in rural China.” Modern China 39(4), 380–407.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
O'Malley, Pat. 1996. “Indigenous governance.” Economy and Society 25(3), 310–336.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pieke, Frank N. 2003. “The genealogical mentality in modern China.” The Journal of Asian Studies 62(1), 101–128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Potter, Pitman B. 2003. “Belief in control: regulation of religion in China.” The China Quarterly 174, 317–337.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Qian, Junxi, and Kong, Lily. 2018. “When secular universalism meets pluralism: religious schools and the politics of school-based management in Hong Kong.” Annals of the American Association of Geographers 108(3), 794–810.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Szonyi, Michael. 2002. Practicing Kinship: Lineage and Descent in Late Imperial China. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Thøgersen, Stig. 2000. “Cultural life and cultural control in rural China: where is the Party?” The China Journal 44, 129–141.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tsai, Lily L. 2007. Accountability without Democracy: Solidary Groups and Public Goods Provision in Rural China. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wang, Chi-Mao. 2013. “Governing the Taiwanese countryside: guanxi, power and agency.” Journal of Peasant Studies 40(5), 799–815.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Williams, Andrew, Cloke, Paul and Thomas, Samuel. 2012. “Co-constituting neoliberalism: faith-based organisations, co-option, and resistance in the UK.” Environment and Planning A 44(6), 1479–1501.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Woods, Michael. 1997. “Researching rural conflicts: hunting, local politics and actor-networks.” Journal of Rural Studies 14(3), 321–340.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Xiao, Tangbiao, Luo, Xingzuo and Qiu, Hongmin (eds.). 2010. Nongcun zongzu yu difang zhili baogao (A Report on Rural Lineage and Local Governance). Shanghai: Xuelin Press.Google Scholar
Yang, Mayfair Mei-hui. 2004. “Spatial struggles: state disenchantment and popular re-appropriation of space in rural southeast China.” Journal of Asian Studies 63(3), 719–755.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yu, Feng. 2001. “Chuantong yu shan bian: difang shehui zhuanxing zhong de zongzu yu mianjian xinyang” (Tradition and transformation: lineages and folk beliefs in transition). MA diss., Xiamen University.Google Scholar
Zhang, Jianjun. 2008. Marketization and Democracy in China. New York: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zheng, Zhenman. 2001. Family Lineage Organization and Social Change in Ming and Qing Fujian. (Szonyi, Michael (trans.)). Manoa: University of Hawai'i Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhu, Huayou, and Chen, Ningning. 2009. “Cunluo citang de gongneng jiqi dui shehuizhuyi xin nongcun jianshe de yingxiang” (Changing functions of ancestral temples and their impacts on the construction of a new socialist countryside). Zhongguo nongcun guancha 86, 86–94.Google Scholar