Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jkksz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T19:27:09.785Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Cultural Revolution and China's Search for Political Order

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  17 February 2009

Byung-joon Ahn
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Since her traditional empire collapsed China has experimented with many political institutions. After the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) imposed a revolutionary one-party regime, the pattern of political order has shifted from one form to another. Intra-Party conflicts preceded these shifts, of which the Cultural Revolution represented the culmination. But in the aftermath of the Cultural Revolution another shift is taking place, so it too has raised a series of important questions about Chinese politics.

Type
Research Article
Information
The China Quarterly , Volume 58 , June 1974 , pp. 249 - 285
Copyright
Copyright © The China Quarterly 1974

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Tucker, Robert C., “Towards a comparative politics of movement regimes,” American Political Science Review, Vol. LV, No. 2 (06 1961), pp. 281–89CrossRefGoogle Scholar . Leonard Schapiro, and Lewis, John Wilson, “The roles of the monolithic party under the totalitarian leader,” in Lewis, John W. (ed.), Party Leadership and Revolutionary Power in China (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1970), pp. 114–45Google Scholar .

2. Lowenthal, Richard, “Stalinism: One-man leadership vs. institutional control in communist one-party regimes,” Columbia University Seminar on Communism, the Research Institute on Communist Affairs, 23 02 1972Google Scholar .

3. “Maoist theories of policy-making and organization,” in Robinson, Thomas W. (ed.), The Cultural Revolution in China (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1971), pp. 123–31Google Scholar .

4. “Policy making under Mao, 1949–68: an overview,” in Lindbeck, John (ed.), China, Management of a Revolutionary Society (Seattle: University of Washington Press, 1971), pp. 79–115Google Scholar .

5. “Bureaucracy and modernization in China: the Maoist critique,” American Sociological Review, Vol. 38, No. 2 (04 1973), pp. 149–63CrossRefGoogle Scholar ; also see Winckler's, Edwin review article: “Political management of the development process: assessing the Chinese development experience,” The China Quarterly, No. 55 (07–09 1973), p. 562CrossRefGoogle Scholar .

6. Pye, Lucian, “Mass participation in communist China: its limitation and the continuity of culture,” in Iindbeck, (ed.), China, pp. 3–33Google Scholar ; Pfeffer, Richard M., “Serving the people and continuing the revolution,” CQ, No. 52 (10–12 1972), pp. 620–53CrossRefGoogle Scholar ; Townsend, James R., Political Participation in Communist China (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1967)Google Scholar ; Johnson, Chalmers, “The changing nature and locus of authority in communist China,” in Lindbeck, (ed), China, pp. 34–78Google Scholar .

7. Skinner, G. William and Winckler, Edwin A., “Compliance succession in rural communist China: a cyclical theory,” in Etzioni, Amitai (ed.), A Sociological Reader on Complex Organizations (New York: Rinehart and Winston, 1969), pp. 410–38Google Scholar ; Tsou, Tang, “The Cultural Revolution and the Chinese political system,” CQ, No. 38 (04–06 1969), p. 63CrossRefGoogle Scholar .

8. For this methodological perspective, see Bern-David, Joseph, “How to organize research in the social sciences,” Daedulus (Spring 1973), pp. 39–52Google Scholar .

9. “The structure of communist politics,” World Politics, No. 4 (07 1972), pp. 498–512Google Scholar .

10. The Theory of Political Coalitions (New Haven: Yale University Press, 1962)Google Scholar .

11. “On practice,” in Selected Readings from the Works of Mao Tse-tung (Peking: Foreign Language Press, 1967), p. 66Google Scholar .

12. “How to be a good communist,” in Collected Works of Liu Shao-ch'i Before 1944 (Hong Kong: Union Research Institute, 1969), p. 181Google Scholar .

13. See Moore, Barrington Jr, Soviet Politics (Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1950)Google Scholar ; Johnson, Chalmers, Revolutionary Change (Boston: Little, Brown, 1966)Google Scholar ; Gurr, Ted, Why Men Rebel (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1970)Google Scholar .

14. En-lai, Chou, “Report to the Tenth National Congress of the Communist Party of China,” Peking Review, No. 35–36 (7 09 1973), pp. 18–21Google Scholar .

15. Lowenthal, Richard, “Development vs. Utopia in Communist policy,” in Johnson, Chalmers (ed.), Changes in Communist Systems (Stanford: Stanford University Press, 1970), pp. 33–116Google Scholar .

16. For the “comprehensive” approach, see Etzioni, Amitai, The Active Society, A Theory of Societal and Political Processes (New York: Free Press, 1968), pp. 260–62Google Scholar ; for the “incremental” approach, see Braybrooke, David and Lindblom, Charles, A Strategy of Decision (New York: Free Press, 1963), pp. 85–86Google Scholar .

17. Huntington, Samuel, Political Order in Changing Societies (New Haven: Yale University Press, 1968), pp. 13–15Google Scholar .

18. Lowenthal, “Stalinism.”

19. For a general statement of these factors, see Johnson, Chalmers, “Comparing communist nations,” in Johnson, (ed.), Changes in Communist Systems, pp. 28–32Google Scholar .

20. “Social and institutional dynamics of one-party systems,” in Huntington, Samuel and Moore, Clement (eds.), Authoritarian Politics in Modern Society (New York: Basic Books, 1970), p. 24Google Scholar .

21. Social Theory and Social Structure (New York: Free Press, 1968), pp. 675–76Google Scholar .

22. Sartori, Giovani, “Politics, ideology, and belief systems,” American Political Science Review, No. 2 (06 1969), p. 402Google Scholar .

23. For “reality testing” of Marxism-Leninism, see Merton, , Social Theory, pp. 475–90Google Scholar .

24. For a general statement of leadership style, see Gibb, Cecil A., “Leadership,” in Lindzey, Gardner and Aronson, Elliot, The Handbook of Social Psychology (Menlo Park, California: Addison-Wesley, 1969), pp. 248–65Google Scholar .

25. Robinson, Thomas, “Chou En-lai and the Cultural Revolution in China,” in Robinson, (ed), The Cultural Revolution, pp. 165–312Google Scholar .

26. Hsiung, James Chieh, Ideology and Practice (New York: Praeger, 1970), pp. 21–24Google Scholar ; see also Li, Victor, “The role of law in communist China,” CQ, No. 44 (1970), pp. 66–111CrossRefGoogle Scholar .

27. Solomon, Richard, Mao's Revolution and the Chinese Political Culture (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1971), pp. 510–263Google Scholar ; see also Pye, Lucian W., The Spirit of Chinese Politics (Cambridge: MIT Press, 1968)Google Scholar .

28. Class and Class Conflict in Industrial Society (Stanford: Stanford University Press, 1959), pp. 204–14Google Scholar .

29. Riker, , The Theory of Political Coalitions, pp. 231–42Google Scholar .

30. For a theoretical statement of this relationship, see Johnson, , Revolutionary Change, pp. 70–71Google Scholar ; Gurr, Ted, “Psychological factors in civil violence,” World Politics, No. 2 (01 1968), p. 355Google Scholar .

31. Apter, David E., The Politics of Modernization (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1965), pp. 72–73Google Scholar .

32. Eisenstadt, S. N., “Modernization and conditions of sustained growth,” World Politics, No. 4 (07 1964), p. 29Google Scholar ; Samuel Huntington, “Political development and political decay,” ibid. No. 3 (April 1965), pp. 389–430.

33. These themes are fully developed in Johnson, Revolutionary Change; Gurr, Why Men Rebel; Etzioni, The Active Society; Huntington, Political Order.

34. Moore, Clement, “The single party as a source of legitimacy,” in Huntington, and Moore, (eds.), Authoritarian Politics, p. 49Google Scholar ; also see ibid. pp. 9–17.

35. For this period, see Ahn, Byung-joon, “Adjustments in the Great Leap Forward and their ideological legacy, 1959–60,” in Johnson, Chalmers (ed.), Ideology and Politics in Contemporary China (Seattle: University of Washington Press, 1973), pp. 257–300Google Scholar .

36. Friedrich, Carl J., Man and His Government (New York: McGraw-Hill, 1963), pp. 199–215Google Scholar ; for a case in American politics, see Neustadt, Richard, Presidential Power (New York: John Wiley & Sons, 1963), pp. 64–97Google Scholar .

37. See Snow's, Edgar report in New Republic, 10 01 1971, p. 19Google Scholar .

38. For this polity, see Huntington, , Political Order, pp. 12–32Google Scholar .

39. See ibid.; Tucker, “Toward a comparative politics of movement regimes”; Kornhauser, William, The Politics of Mass Society (New York: Free Press, 1959)Google Scholar .

40. See Huntington, , Political Order, pp. 78–82Google Scholar ; Perlmutter, Amos, “The praetorian state and the praetorian army, toward a taxonomy of civil-military relations in developing polities,” Comparative Politics, No. 3 (04 1969), pp. 382–404CrossRefGoogle Scholar .

41. Pa 1-san Hung-wei-pao (Tientsin: 13 08, Red Guard Paper), 13 May 1967, p. 6Google Scholar .

42. Teiwes, Frederick C., “Provincial politics in China: themes and variations,” in Lindbeck, (ed.), China, pp. 125–30Google Scholar .

43. Barnett, A. Doak, Cadres, Bureaucracy, and Political Power in Communist China (New York: Columbia University Press, 1967), p. 73Google Scholar .

44. len-min Jih-pao (People's Daily) (henceforward Jen-min), 17 April 1967.

45. “Getting ahead and along in communist China: the ladder of success on the eve of the Cultural Revolution,” in Lewis, (ed.), Party Leadership and Revolutionary Power in China, pp. 304–50Google Scholar .

46. Jen-min, 16 May and 23 November 1967.

47. “It is fine,” ibid. 23 August 1966, editorial.

48. Schwartz, Benjamin I., “The reign of virtue: some broad perspectives on leader and party in the Cultural Revolution,” in Lewis, (ed.), Party Leadership and Revolutionary Power in China, pp. 149–69Google Scholar .

49. For a collection of these instructions, see Atsuyoshi, Nishijima, Mō Takutō Saikō Shishi (Mao Tse-tung's Supreme Instructions) (Tokyo: Sanichi Shobo, 1970)Google Scholar .

50. “Bombard the headquarters – my first big-character poster,” in Current Background (henceforward CB) (Hong Kong: U.S. Consulate-General), No. 891, p. 63Google Scholar .

51. Schwartz, Benjamin I., “A personal view of some thoughts of Mao Tsetung,” in Johnson, (ed.), Ideology and Politics in Contemporary China, pp. 352–70Google Scholar .

52. Life, 30 April 1971, p. 46.

53. Huntington, , Political Order, pp. 13–14Google Scholar .

54. Robinson, , “Chou En-lai and the Cultural Revolution,” pp. 238–59Google Scholar ; also see his “The Wuhan Incident: local strife and provincial rebellion in the Cultural Revolution,” CQ, No. 47 (1971), pp. 413–38CrossRefGoogle Scholar .

55. “Outline of ‘Project 51,’” Chinese Law and Government, Autumn-Winter 1972–73. p. 47.

56. Jen-min, 19 and 29 March and 7 April 1967.

57. “The Chinese Army after the Cultural Revolution: the effect of intervention,” CQ, No. 55 (1973), p. 452Google Scholar .

58. Summary of the Chinese Mainland Press (Hong Kong: U.S. Consulate General), No. 4036, pp. 1–6Google Scholar ; ibid. No. 4026, pp. 1–2; ibid. No. 4069, pp. 1–6; Jen-min, 8 September 1967.

59. Robinson, , “Chou En-lai,” pp. 272–73Google Scholar .

60. See Whitson, William, “The Field Army in Chinese communist military politics,” CQ, No. 37 (1969), pp. 1–30CrossRefGoogle Scholar .

61. Wen-lin, Chu, “An analysis of the 29 New CCP Committees at the provincial level,” Issues and Studies, No. 11 (11 1971), p. 47Google Scholar .

62. “The constitution of the Communist Party of China,” Peking Review, No. 18 (30 04 1969), pp. 36–39Google Scholar ; also see “Text of the 1970 Draft Constitution of the People's Republic of China” in Studies in Comparative Communism, No. 1 (01 1971), pp. 100–106Google Scholar .

63 P'eng, Ch'i, “Party affairs in communist China^during 1971,” Chung-kung yen-chiu, No. 1 (01 1972), p. 6Google Scholar .

64. Peking Review, No. 35–36 (7 09 1973), p. 17Google Scholar .

65. “Mao Tse-tung's speech to the first plenary session of the CCP's 9th Centra] Committee,” Issues and Studies, No. 3 (03 1970), p. 7Google Scholar .

66. “Summary of Chairman Mao's talk to responsible local comrades during his tour of inspection” (Mid-August to 12 September 1971), Chinese Law and Government, p. 40.

67. Ibid. p. 36, and p. 39.

68. Riker, , Theory of Political Coalitions, p. 231Google Scholar .

69. “Outline of ‘Project 571,’” Chinese Law and Government, p. 52.

70. Ibid. p. 54.

71. New York Times, 2 September 1973; for a background of this incident, see Bridgham, Philip, “The fall of Lin Piao,” CQ, No. 55 (1973), pp. 427–99CrossRefGoogle Scholar .

72. “Summary of Chairman Mao's talk,” p. 32.

73. Ibid. p. 33.

74. Ibid. p. 40; Peking University Party Committee Writing Group, “People's real struggle advances in history,” Hung-ch'i, No. 11 (1 10 1971), pp. 52–60Google Scholar ; Jen-min, 1 December 1971 and 22 January 1972.

75. “Consolidate the proletarian party spirit,” Hung-ch'i, No. 12 (1 11 1971), pp. 19–23Google Scholar .

76. See Chang, Parris, “Political rehabilitation of cadres in China: a traveller's view,” CQ, No. 54 (1973), pp. 331–40CrossRefGoogle Scholar .

77. See Roderick MacFarquhar, “A visit to the Chinese press,” ibid. No. 53 (1973), pp. 144–52.

78. See Alexander Casella, “Report from China: The Nanniwan May 7th Cadre School,” ibid. pp. 153–57.

79. Jen-min, 27 January 1972; Radio Heilungkiang, 3 January 1972.

80. Jen-min, 1 January, 22 February, 2 March and 5 April 1972; 1 January and 1 May 1973.

81. “Constitution of the Communist Party of China,” in Peking Review, Nos. 35–36 (7 09 1973), p. 28Google Scholar . For a discussion of the 10th Congress see pp. 1–00 of this issue of The China Quarterly.

82. Ibid. No. 35–36 (7 September 1973), p. 32.

83. Ibid. pp. 26, 28, 33.

84. Ibid. pp. 17, 21. 85.

85. Ibid. p. 32.

86. See Lelyveld's, Joseph report from Hong Kong in the New York Times, 28 10 1973Google Scholar .

87. This table is adapted from Fei-ch'ing yen-chiu, No. 5 (05 1969), pp. 22–24Google Scholar , and Chung-kung yen-chiu, No. 9 (09 1973), pp. 28–29Google Scholar .

88. Peking Review, Nos. 35–36 (7 09 1973), p. 25Google Scholar .

89. Ibid. p. 29.

90. Ibid. pp. 19, 25, 26 and 23.

91. Political Parties (New York: Dover, 1959), p. 391Google Scholar .

92. Fleron, Frederic J. Jr, “Towards a reconceptualization of political change in the Soviet Union: the political leadership system,” Comparative Politics, No. 2 (01 1969), pp. 228–44CrossRefGoogle Scholar ; Robert E. Blackwell, Jr, “The Soviet political elite: alternative recruitment policies at the Obkon level,” ibid. No. 1 (October 1973), pp. 99–121.

93. Life, 30 April 1971, p. 49.

94. See Etzioni, The Active Society, passim; also see Whyte, “Bureaucracy.”

95. For “latent” and “manifest” interests, see Dahrendorf, , Class and Class Conflict, pp. 173–79Google Scholar .

96. Huntington, , “Social and institutional dynamics of one-party systems,” p. 33Google Scholar .