Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-g8jcs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-23T11:56:14.500Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Being Together at a Distance, Talking and Avoiding Talk: Making Sense of the Present in Victory Square, Tianjin

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 April 2021

Isabelle Thireau
Isabelle Thireau*
Affiliation:
Centre for Studies on Modern and Contemporary China (CECMC), School for Advanced Studies in the Social Sciences (EHESS) and French National Centre for Scientific Research (CNRS), Paris, France. Email: [email protected].
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This paper explores a “public gathering” which took place every evening from 1991 to 2017 in Victory Square (Shengli guangchang 胜利广场), a public square in Tianjin. The essay opens with an analysis of the type of publicness that stems from the way participants “do things together.” It then describes how a specific public realm appears through the way participants “talk together.” It finally suggests that even if they are overrun with doubt, indeterminacy and anxiety, or embedded in a specific distance-based sociality, the conversations on Victory Square are not a minor, secondary activity. On the contrary, they take place on a common stage where participants interact with one another, reveal themselves as unique individuals and discuss their everyday affairs and common practices. Grasped as an “intermediary public sphere,” this type of gathering engenders and reinforces not only shared meanings and evaluations but also practical knowledge whose validity goes beyond this situated gathering.

摘要

摘要

本文以天津市持续了二十多年（1991—2017）在胜利广场这个公共广场的一种 “公共聚会” 为观察点。作者尝试以 “中介性公共领域” 的视角，理解观察到的社会现象。在参与者健身或 “一块做” 的时候，在他们如果愿意的话 “一块说” 的时候，不同的距离，不同的参与方式，不同的期待同时展示，导致一个特定的公共性类型的出现。研究表明，即使它们被疑惑, 不确定和焦虑所充斥，在胜利广场上展开的对话也不是一种次要的活动。恰恰相反，它们发生在一个共同的舞台上，参与者在这个舞台上相互交流，展现自己作为独特的个体，谈论自己共同的事务。这样的聚会不仅使共同的意义和评价得以实现，而且使社会现实得以稳定。

Keywords

Tianjinintermediary public spherepublic gatheringpublic realmindeterminacystrangerssocial reality天津中介公共领域公共聚会公共领域不确定性陌生人社会现实
Type
Special section: “Revisiting the Public Sphere in 20th- and 21st-century China”
Information
The China Quarterly , Volume 246 , June 2021 , pp. 428 - 446
Check for updates
Copyright
Copyright © SOAS University of London, 2021

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Arendt, Hannah. 1958. The Human Condition. Chicago: University of Chicago. Press.Google Scholar
Bégout, Bruce. 2010. La Découverte du Quotidien. Paris: Allia.Google Scholar
Berlant, Lauren. 1997. “Introduction: the intimate public sphere.” In Berlant, Lauren, The Queen of America Goes to Washington City: Essays on Sex and Citizenship. Durham, NC: Duke University Press, 1–24.Google Scholar
Calhoun, Craig. 1992. “Introduction.” In Calhoun, Craig (ed.), Habermas and the Public Sphere. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1–50.Google Scholar
Chen, Caroline. 2010. “Dancing in the streets of Beijing: improvised uses within the urban system.” In Hou, Jeffrey (ed.), Insurgent Public Space: Guerrilla Urbanism and the Remaking of Contemporary Cities. London: Routledge, 21–35.Google Scholar
Cottereau, Alain. 1992. “‘Esprit public’ et capacité de juger: la stabilisation d'un espace public en France aux lendemains de la Révolution.” In Cottereau, Alain and Ladrière, Paul (eds.), Pouvoir et légitimité – figures de l'espace public. Paris: Editions de l'EHESS, 239–272CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cottereau, Alain. 1995. “L'embauche et la vie normative des métiers durant les deux premiers tiers du XIXème siècle français.” Les Cahiers des Relations Professionnelles 10, 47–71.Google Scholar
Cottereau, Alain. 1999. “Dénis de justice, dénis de réalité – remarques sur la réalité sociale et sa dénégation.” In Pascale, Gruson and Renaud, Dulong (eds.), L'Expérience du déni. Paris: Éditions de la MSH, 159–179.Google Scholar
Cottereau, Alain. 2002. “Droit et bon droit. Un droit des ouvriers instauré puis évincé par le droit du travail (France, XIXe siècle).” Annales 6, 1521–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cottereau, Alain, and Marzok, Mokhtar Mohatar. 2012. Une Famille Andalouse. Ethnocomptabilité d'une économie invisible. Paris: Editions Bouchène.Google Scholar
Eliasoph, Nina. 1998. Avoiding Politics. How Americans Produce Apathy in Everyday Life. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Farquhar, Judith. 2009. “The park pass: peopling and civilizing in a new old Beijing.” Public Culture 20(3), 303–327.Google Scholar
Farquhar, Judith, and Zhang, Qicheng. 2005. “Biopolitical Beijing: pleasure, sovereignty and self-cultivation in China's capital.” Cultural Anthropology 20(3), 303–327.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Farrer, James. 2000. “Dancing through the market transition. Disco and dance-hall sociability in Shanghai.” In Davis, Deborah (ed.), The Consumer Revolution in Urban China. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press, 226–249.Google Scholar
Goffman, Erving. 1963. Behavior in Public Places: Notes on the Social Organization of Gatherings. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
Graezer-Bideau, Florence. 2012. La Danse du Yangge. Culture et politique dans la Chine du XXème siècle. Paris: La Découverte.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Habermas, Jurgen. 1989. The Structural Transformation of the Public Sphere: An Inquiry into a Category of Bourgeois Society. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Hampel, Amir. 2017. “Equal temperament: autonomy and identity in Chinese speaking clubs.” Ethos 45(4), 441–461.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kennedy, John. 2011. “Chine: une rumeur sur du sel radioactif provoque une panique.” (Claire Ulrich (trans.)). Global Voices, 16 March, https://fr.globalvoices.org/2011/03/16/61519/.Google Scholar
Kunreuther, Laura. 2014. Voicing Subjects. Public Intimacy and Mediation in Kathmandu. Berkeley, CA, University of California Press.Google Scholar
Lee, Haiyan. 2014. The Stranger and the Chinese Moral Imagination. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Qian, Junxi. 2014. “Performing the public man: cultures and identities in China's grassroots leisure class.” City and Community 13(1), 26–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Quéré, Louis. 1992. “L'espace public: de la théorie politique à la métathéorie sociologique.” Quaderni 18, 75–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Richaud, Lisa. 2016. “Between ‘face’ and ‘faceless’ relationships in China's public places: ludic encounters and activity-oriented friendships among middle- and old-aged urbanites in Beijing public parks.” Urban Studies special issue on “Urban friendship networks: affective negotiations in the city.” DOI: 10.1177/0042098016633609. Accessed on 7 April 2017.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rochot, Justine. 2017. “‘Un parc à soi’: les parcs, territoires de la vieillesse en Chine contemporaine.” Lien Social et Politiques 79, 193–214. http://id.erudit.org/iderudit/1041739ae. Accessed 15 November 2017.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schutz, Alfred. 1951. “Making music together: a study in social relationships.” Social Research 18(1), 76–97.Google Scholar
Simmel, Georg. 1999. Sociologie. Etudes sur les formes de la socialisation. Paris: PUF.Google Scholar
Veg, Sebastian. Forthcoming. “Publicness and the public sphere.” In Sapiro, Gisèle and Geroulanos, Stefanos (eds.), The Society of Ideas: Handbook of Intellectual History. Abingdon: Routledge.Google Scholar
Warner, Michael. 2002. Publics and Counterpublics. New York: Zone Books.Google Scholar
Yi, Chengdong, and Huang, Youqin. 2014. “Housing consumption and housing inequality in Chinese cities during the first decade of the twenty-first century.” Housing Studies 29(2), 291–311.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zito, Angela. 2014. “Writing in water, or evanescence, enchantment and ethnography in a Chinese urban park.” Visual Anthropology Review 30(1), 11–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar