Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rcrh6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-01T04:30:17.917Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Tracing Problem: An aspect of outcome studies in Child Welfare

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 March 2016

Agatha Rogers
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Between the years 1960 and 1972, well over one thousand children in all spent a period of residence in the St. Vincent de Paul’s Children’s Homes situated at South Melbourne and Black Rock in Victoria. One wonders about the circumstances which bought these children into care and one also wonders where they are now, 20 or 30 years after leaving St. Vincent’s. How have they coped with the stresses of life during those years? Questions such as this led the author to embark on a research project. Few reports of research of this nature are to be found. The following description of one aspect of that project, the task of tracing the subjects, may go some way toward explaining the scarcity. It shows though, that tenacity can have some rewards.

Type
Research Article
Information
Children Australia , Volume 17 , Issue 1 , 1992 , pp. 16 - 19
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1992

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Fanshel, David. 1966. “Child Welfare.” in Maas, Henry S. Five Fields of Social Service: Reviews of Research, National Association of Social Workers Inc., USA.Google Scholar
Ferguson, Thomas (1966) Children in Care – and After. Oxford University Press, USA.Google Scholar
Festinger, Trudy (1983) No One Ever Asked Us… A Postcript to Foster Care, New York University Press, USA.Google Scholar
Skeels, H. M. (1966) Adult Status of Children with Contrasting Early Life Experiences, Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development. University of Chicago Press, USA. Vol. 31, No. 3.Google Scholar