Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-j824f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-12T22:24:40.044Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Relocation following parental separation

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 February 2016

Nicola Taylor
Nicola Taylor*
Affiliation:
Centre for Research on Children and Families, University of Otaga Auckland Centre, New Zealand
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Each year many families relocate to live in new places, but disputes will not usually arise over this when the family is intact because the two parents, and perhaps the children, will reach the decision about shifting together. Nevertheless the move will mean these children are likely to experience the loss of familiar surroundings and close friendships, need to change (pre)schools and start afresh with many aspects of their lives. It is when the parents are already living apart that a proposed relocation by one of them might mean the Courts are called upon to examine the interests at stake and determine the outcome. Relocation in this context has particular poignancy for the children involved because, if their parent's application to relocate is approved by the Court, this might marginalise the role of their other parent in their life.

It is not, of course, uncommon for separated parents to have to move in the aftermath of their relationship breakdown as they re-establish themselves in separate households and negotiate their children's care and contact arrangements. However, when the proposed relocation by the resident parent involves moving such a distance from the non-resident parent that contact visits become problematic, then the potential for a major dispute exists. This is particularly so when there has been a pattern of frequent contact and the non-resident parent refuses to acquiesce in the move. While these cases can be very difficult to resolve by agreement, some separated parents are able to negotiate the relocation without seeking recourse to the legal system.

Type
Board Bulletin
Information
Children Australia , Volume 35 , Issue 4 , 2010 , pp. 5 - 6
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2010

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Behrens, J., Smyth, B. & Kaspiew, R. (2009) ‘Australian family law court decisions on relocation: Dynamics in parents' relationships across time’, Australian Journal of Family Law, 23(3), 222–246.Google Scholar
Behrens, J., Smyth, B. & Kaspiew, R. (2010) ‘Outcomes in relocation decisions: Some new data’, Australian Journal of Family Law, 24(1), 97–103.Google Scholar
Bryant, D. (2005, August) Chief Justice of the Family Court of Australia appearing before the House of Representatives Standing Committee on Legal and Constitutional Affairs Report on the exposure draft of the Family Law Amendment (Shared Parental Responsibility) Bill 2005.Google Scholar
Parkinson, P., Cashmore, J. & Single, J. (2010) ‘The need for reality testing in relocation cases’, Family Law Quarterly, 44(1), 1–34.Google Scholar
Taylor, N.J. & Freeman, M. (in press) ‘International research evidence on relocation: Past, present and future’, Family Law Quarterly.Google Scholar
Taylor, N.J., Gollop, M. & Henaghan, R.M. (2010a) Relocation following parental separation: The welfare and best interests of children, Research Report to the New Zealand Law Foundation, University of Otago, Dunedin: Centre for Research on Children and Families and Faculty of Law (www.otago.ac.nz/crcf).Google Scholar
Taylor, N.J., Gollop, M. & Henaghan, R.M. (2010b) ‘Relocation following parental separation in New Zealand: Complexity and diversity’, International Family Law, March, 97-105.Google Scholar