Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-j824f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-09T16:02:38.340Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A Just System? How Punitive Youth Justice Systems Increase the Risk of Crime

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  30 October 2017

Julie Edwards
Julie Edwards*
Affiliation:
CEO, Jesuit Social Services, Richmond, Victoria, Australia
*
address for correspondence: Julie Edwards, Jesuit Social Services, Policy and Advocacy, 326 Church Street, Richmond, Victoria 3121, Australia. E-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

For children and young people who offend, contact with the justice system can lead to life-long offending, with evidence showing that the younger a child enters the justice system the more likely he/she is to have sustained contact and go on to reoffend (Australian Institute of Health and Welfare (AIHW), 2017). Local and international youth justice approaches that aim to rehabilitate or resocialise the child or young person often have more success in preventing reoffending (Elwick, Davis, Crehan, & Clay, 2013). So, what is it that makes an effective youth justice system, and how can we ensure that children and young people are diverted from the criminal justice system effectively and that those who offend do not continue into a life of crime?

Keywords

youthjusticeadolescentchildpolicy
Type
Opinions
Information
Children Australia , Volume 42 , Issue 4 , December 2017 , pp. 233 - 239
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s) 2017 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Arthur, R. (2012). Rethinking the criminal responsibility of young people in England and Wales. European Journal of Crime, Criminal Law and Criminal Justice, 20 (1), 13–29. doi: 10.1163/157181712X610460.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Australian Bureau of Statistics. (2017). Recorded crime - Offenders, 2015–2016 (No. 4519.0). Retrieved from http://www.abs.gov.au/AUSSTATS/[email protected]/DetailsPage/4519.02015-16?OpenDocument.Google Scholar
Australian Institute of Health and Welfare [AIHW]. (2013). Young people aged 10–14 in the youth justice system 2011–2012. Retrieved from http://www.aihw.gov.au/WorkArea/DownloadAsset.aspx?id=60129543941.Google Scholar
Australian Institute of Health and Welfare [AIHW]. (2016). Young people in child protection and under youth justice supervision 2014–2015 (Data Linkage Series 22). Retrieved from http://www.aihw.gov.au/WorkArea/DownloadAsset.aspx?id=60129557321.Google Scholar
Australian Institute of Health and Welfare [AIHW]. (2016b). Youth justice in Australia 2015–16 (Bulletin Number 133). Retrieved from http://www.aihw.gov.au/WorkArea/DownloadAsset.aspx?id=60129554930.Google Scholar
Australian Institute of Health and Welfare [AIHW]. (2017). Young people returning to sentenced youth justice supervision 2015-16 (Juvenile justice series no. 21. Cat. no. JUV 104). Retrieved from http://www.aihw.gov.au/WorkArea/DownloadAsset.aspx?id=60129559882.Google Scholar
Baines, R. (2016). Ashley youth detention: Children's Commissioner wants independent monitoring of Tasmanian centre. ABC News. Retrieved from http://www.abc.net.au/news/2016-08-17/call-for-independent-monitoring-of-ashley-centre/7749706 Google Scholar
Begley, P., & Maley, J. (2016). Kids self harm in custody, launch legal action against government. The Sydney Morning Herald. Retrieved from http://www.smh.com.au/nsw/kids-self-harm-in-custody-launch-legal-action-against-government-20161103-gshkoq.html.Google Scholar
Elwick, A., Davis, M., Crehan, L., & Clay, B. (2013). Improving outcomes for young offenders: An international perspective. CfBt Education Trust. Retrieved from https://www.educationdevelopmenttrust.com/~/media/EDT/Reports/Research/2013/r-improving-outcomes-2013.pdf.Google Scholar
Ericson, M., & Vinson, T. (2010). Young people on remand in Victoria - Balancing individual and community interests. Richmond: Jesuit Social Services. Retrieved from http://jss.org.au/wp-content/uploads/2015/10/Young_people_in_remand_in_Victoria_-_Balancing_individual_and_community_interests.pdf.Google Scholar
Farmer, E. (2011). The age of criminal responsibility: Developmental science and human rights perspectives. Journal of Children's Services, 6 (2), 86–95. doi: 10.1108/17466661111149385.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goldson, B. (2009). Counterblast: ‘Difficult to understand or defend’: A reasoned case for raising the age of criminal responsibility. The Howard Journal, 48 (5), 514–521. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-2311.2009.00592.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Indig, D., Vecchiato, C., Haysom, L., Beilby, R., Carter, J., Champion, U., . . . Whitton, G. (2011). 2009 NSW Young people in custody health survey: Full report. Sydney: Justice Health and Juvenile Justice. Retrieved from http://www.justicehealth.nsw.gov.au/publications/ypichs-full.pdf.Google Scholar
Jesuit Social Services. (2013). Thinking outside: Alternatives to remand for children. Retrieved from http://jss.org.au/wp-content/uploads/2015/10/Thinking_Outside_Research_Report_-Final_amend_15052013.pdf.Google Scholar
Jesuit Social Services. (2016). States of justice: Criminal justice trends across Australia. Retrieved from https://jss.org.au/states-of-justice-criminal-justice-trends-across-australia/.Google Scholar
Jesuit Social Services. (2016). Re-engaging disadvantaged learners in education, training and employment. Retrieved from https://jss.org.au/reengaging-disadvantaged-learners-in-education-training-and-employment/.Google Scholar
Larsen, J. (2014). Restorative justice in the Australian criminal justice system (Research and Public Policy Series Number 127). Canberra: Australian Institute of Criminology. Retrieved from http://www.aic.gov.au/media_library/publications/rpp/rpp127.pdf.Google Scholar
Mathews, B. (2000). Children's criminal responsibility in Australia: Some legal, psychological and human rights issues. Australia & New Zealand Journal of Law & Education, 5 (2), 27–45. Retrieved from http://www.anzela.edu.au/assets/anzjle_5.2_-_3_ben_matthews.pdf.Google Scholar
Miller, R. (2007). Cumulative harm: A conceptual overview. Melbourne: Victorian Government Department of Human Services. Retrieved from http://www.dhs.vic.gov.au/__data/assets/pdf_file/0012/589665/cumulative-harm-conceptual-overview-part1.pdf.Google Scholar
Pearl, H. (2017). Victorian court rules detention of youth in adult jail unlawful. SBS. Retrieved from http://www.sbs.com.au/news/article/2017/05/11/victorian-court-rules-detention-youth-adult-jail-unlawful.Google Scholar
Richards, K. (2011). What makes juvenile offenders different from adult offenders? (Trends and Issues in Crime and Criminal Justice Number 416). Canberra: Australian Institute of Criminology. Retrieved from http://www.aic.gov.au/media_library/publications/tandi_pdf/tandi409.pdf.Google Scholar
Robinson, G., Silburn, S. R., & Arney, F. (2011). The value of investment in early years: Balancing the costs of childhood services (Early Childhood Series Number 4). Darwin: Northern Territory Government. Retrieved from http://ccde.menzies.edu.au/sites/default/files/resources/Robinson%202011%20ValueOfInvestmentIntheEarlyYears.pdf.Google Scholar
Royal Commission into the Protection and Detention of Children in the Northern Territory, White, M., & Gooda, M. (2017). Royal commission into the protection and detention of children in the Northern Territory interim report. Canberra: Attorney-General's Department. Retrieved from https://childdetentionnt.royalcommission.gov.au/about-us/Documents/RCNT-Interim-report.pdf.Google Scholar
Snow, P., & Powell, M. (2012). Youth (in)justice: Oral language competence in early life and risk for engagement in antisocial behaviour in adolescence (Trends and Issues in Crime and Criminal Justice Number 355). Canberra: Australian Institute of Criminology. Retrieved from http://www.aic.gov.au/media_library/publications/tandi_pdf/tandi435.pdf.Google Scholar
Taylor, C. (2016). Review of the youth justice system in England and Wales. London: Ministry of Justice. Retrieved from https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/577103/youth-justice-review-final-report.pdf.Google Scholar
te Riele, K., & Rosauer, K. (2015). Education at the heart of the children's court: Evaluation of the education initiative final report. Melbourne: The Victorian Institute for Education, Diversity and Lifelong Learning. Retrieved from https://www.vu.edu.au/sites/default/files/victoria-institute/pdfs/Education-at-the-Heart-of-the-Children's-Court-Final-Report-web.pdf.Google Scholar
The State of Queensland. (2016). Review of youth detention centres. Retrieved from http://www.youthdetentionreview.qld.gov.au/ Google Scholar
Urbas, G. (2000). The age of criminal responsibility (Trends and Issues in Crime and Criminal Justice Number 181). Canberra: Australian Institute of Criminology. Retrieved from http://www.aic.gov.au/media_library/publications/tandi_pdf/tandi181.pdf.Google Scholar
Weinberger, D., Elvevåg, B., & Giedd, J. N. (2005). The adolescent brain: A work in progress. Washington: The National Campaign to Prevent Teen Pregnancy. Retrieved from https://thenationalcampaign.org/sites/default/files/resourceprimary-download/brain.pdf.Google Scholar
Youth Parole Board. (2016). Youth Parole Board annual report 2015–16. Retrieved from http://www.dhs.vic.gov.au/__data/assets/pdf_file/0009/975942/Youth-Parole-Board-Annual-Report-2015-16.pdf.Google Scholar