Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rdxmf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-01T04:06:07.687Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Family centred group care practice Concept and implementation

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 February 2016

Frank Ainsworth
Affiliation:
Children's Studies, Edith Cowan University, Joondalup Campus, Perth, W.A. and Albert E. Trieschman Center, Needham, MA. 02192
Richard W. Small
Affiliation:
Walker School, Needham, MA. 02192

Abstract

This article cites the international research evidence that supports family centred group care practice. A working definition, the key assumption and an orientation to group care and family work compatible with family centred group care practice is then articulated. This is followed by a set of practice guidelines and identification of the key characteristics of family centred group care agencies.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1994

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Ainsworth, F. & Fulcher, L.C. (1981) Group care for children: concept and issues. London: Tavistock Publications.Google Scholar
Ainsworth, F. & Hansen, P. (1986) Incorporating natural family members into residential programs for children and youth. Australian Child and Family Welfare, 11(1), pp1214.Google Scholar
Ainsworth, F. (1991). A ‘no blame’ approach to work with the families of children and adolescents in residential care, Child and Youth Care Forum, 20(5) pp301311.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ainsworth, F. (1993) Family preservation services: a cautionary note, Children Australia, 18(2) pp1012.Google Scholar
Ainsworth, M.D.S. (1982) Attachment: retrospect and prospect. In Parkes, C.M. & Stevenson-Hinde, J. (eds.), The place of attachment in human behavior. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Bean, P. & Melville, J. (1989) The lost children of the empire, London: Unwin Hyman.Google Scholar
Bowlby, J. (1969) Attachment and loss. 1. Attachment, New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Brown, J. & Weil, M. (1992) Family practice: a curriculum plan for social services. Washington, DC: Child Welfare League of America.Google Scholar
Burford, G. & Casson, C. (1989) Including families in residential work: educational and agency tasks, British Journal of Social Work, 19(1), pp1737.Google Scholar
Depp, D.C. (1982) After reunion: perceptions of adult adoptees, adoptive parents and birth parents. Child Welfare, 61(2), pp.15119.Google Scholar
Fanshel, D. & Shinn, E.B. (1978) Children in foster care: a longitudinal investigation, New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Fanshel, D., Finch, S.J. & Grundy, J.F. (1990) Foster children in life course perspective. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Festinger, T. (1983) No one ever asked us … postscript to foster care. Washington, DC: Child Welfare League of America.Google Scholar
Fox, Harding L. (1991) Perspectives in child care policy, New York: Longman.Google Scholar
Fulcher, L.C. & Ainsworth, F. (1985) Group care practice with children, London: Tavistock Publications.Google Scholar
Garland, D.S.R. (1982) Residential care workers as primary agents of family intervention, Child and Youth Care Quarterly, 16(1), pp2134.Google Scholar
Hansen, P. & Ainsworth, F. (1983) Family and parenting analogies in Australian residential child care, Australian Child and Family Welfare, 8(3/4), pp35.Google Scholar
Hess, P.M. & Proch, K. (1993) Visiting: the heart of reunification. In Pine, B.A.. Warsh, R. & Maluccio, A.N., Together again: family reunification in foster care, Washington, DC: Child Welfare League of America.Google Scholar
Keith-Lucas, A. (1987) What else can residential care do? And do well? Residential Treatment for Children and Youth, 4(4), pp2537.Google Scholar
Maier, H.W. (1990) A developmental perspective for child and youth care work, In Anglin, J., Denholm, C., Ferguson, R. & Pence, A. (eds), Perspectives in professional child and youth care. New York: Haworth Press.Google Scholar
Maluccio, A.N., Warsh, R. & Pine, B.A. (1993) Together again. Family reunification in foster care. Washington, DC: Child Welfare League of America.Google Scholar
Howe, D. (1991) Half a million women. London: Penguin Books.Google Scholar
Jenson, J.M. & Whittaker, J.K. (1987) Parental involvement in children's residential treatment: from preplacement to aftercare, Children and Youth Services Review, 9(2), pp81100.Google Scholar
Jones, M.A. & Moses, B. (1984) West Virginia's former foster children, their experience and lives as young adults. Washington, DC: Child Welfare League of America.Google Scholar
Kelsall, J. & McCullough, B. (1989) Family work in residential child care: partnership in practice, Cheadle, Cheshire: Boys' and Girls' Welfare Society.Google Scholar
Maier, H.W. (in press) Family welfare paves the way for child welfare, In Giligun, J.F., Schwartz, I.M.. Melton, G.D. & Elsikovitz, Z. (eds.), Rethinking child welfare. Lincoln, NE: University of Nebraska Press.Google Scholar
Millham, S., Bullock, R., Hosie, K. & Haak, M. (1986) Lost in care. Aldershot: Gower.Google Scholar
Pecora, P.J., Whittaker, J.K., Maluccio, A.N., Barth, R.P. & Plotnick, R.D. (1992) The child welfare challenge. New York: Aldine de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Proch, K. & Howard, J.A. (1986) Parental visiting of children in foster care, Social Work, 31(2), pp178181.Google Scholar
Small, R., Ainsworth, F. & Hansen, P. (1994) The Carolina's project – working paper no.1., Needham, MA: Albert E. Trieschman Center.Google Scholar
Triseliotis, J. (1973) In search of origins: the experience of adopted people, London: Routledge Kegan & Paul.Google Scholar
Wells, S. (1993) What do birth mothers want? Adoption and Fostering, 17(4), pp2226.Google Scholar
Wicks, B. (1989) No time to say good-bye, London: Bloomsbury Publishing.Google Scholar