Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t8hqh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-02T19:47:34.906Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Families First Pilot Program in Victoria: Cuckoo or contribution?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 February 2016

Lynda Campbell
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The Families First Pilot Program in the then Outer East metropolitan region of Melbourne began in mid-1991 as an intensive family preservation and reunification service for children on the verge of state care. The service offered was brief (4-6 week), intensive (up to 20 hours per week), home-based and flexible (24 hour a day, 7 day a week availability) and all members of the household or family were the focus of service even though the goals were clearly grounded in the protection of the child. This paper begins with some of the apprehension expressed both in the field and in Children Australia in 1993, and reports upon the now completed evaluation of the pilot, which covered the first 18 months of operation. The evaluation examined implementation and program development issues and considered the client population of the service against comparative data about those children at risk who were not included. The paper concludes that there is room for Families First in the Victorian system of protective and family services and points to several developmental issues.

Type
Research Article
Information
Children Australia , Volume 19 , Issue 2 , 1994 , pp. 4 - 10
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1994

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Ainsworth, F. (1993) ‘Family Preservation Services: A cautionary note,’ Children Australia 18(3), pp10–12.Google Scholar
Barth, R. (1990) ‘Theories guiding home-based intensive family preservation services’ in Whittaker, J. et al (eds) Reaching High Risk Families Aldine de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Campbell, L. (1987) ‘Case Planning in Child and Family Welfare’ Unpublished thesis, University of Melbourne.Google Scholar
Campbell, L. (1993) ‘Families First: Report of the Evaluation of the Pilot Program’ University of Melbourne School of Social Work/Canterbury Family Centre.Google Scholar
Haapala, D. & Kinney, J. (1979) ‘Home-builders’ approach to the training of in-home therapists’ in Maybanks, S. & Bryce, M. (eds) Home-Based Services for Children and Families: Policy, Practice and Research Charles C. Thomas, pp248–259.Google Scholar
Hamilton, C. (1993) ‘Intensive Family Services in Victoria’ Children's Welfare Association of Victoria Inc.Google Scholar
Maas, H. & Engler, R. (1959) Children in Need of Parents Columbia University Press p.397.Google Scholar
Maluccio, A., Fein, E., & Olmstead, K. (1986) Permanency Planning for Children: Concepts and Methods Tavistock.Google Scholar
Maluccio, A. (1990) ‘Child Welfare and Family-Based Services in the U.S.A.: An Overview’ in Conference Proceedings Focusing on Families: Intensive Family-Based Child Welfare Practice Children's Welfare Association of Victoria/ Community Services Victoria/ University of Melbourne/ Australian Institute of Family Studies.Google Scholar
Mitchell, B. (1987) ‘Helping Families in Great Need: An American Perspective’, St. Anthony's Family Service.Google Scholar
Mitchell, B. (1990) ‘New Directions for Family Support and Service in Child Welfare’ Children Australia 15(3), pp15–19.Google Scholar
Scott, D. (1993a) ‘Introducing Family Preservation in Australia: Issues in transplanting programs from the United States’ Children Australia 18(2), pp3–9.Google Scholar
Scott, D. (1993b) ‘Child Abuse: Perspectives on the Past and Present’ Dean's Lecture 1993, Faculty of Arts, University of Melbourne. p6.Google Scholar
Shadish, W., Cook, T. & Leviton, L. (1991) Foundations of Program Evaluation Theories of Practice Sage, chs 8&9.Google Scholar
Tierney, L. (1982) ‘New Directions in Child Welfare’ Creswick Foundation Conference, Children's Welfare Association of Victoria.Google Scholar
Tierney, L. (1985) ‘Some Dilemmas in Human Service Administration: The Case of Child Welfare’ Australian Child and Family Welfare, Dec.Google Scholar
Tiffen, R. (1985) ‘Cases Found; Opportunities Lost’ Unpublished Thesis, University of Melbourne School of Social Work.Google Scholar
Wolcott, I. (1988) Family Support Services Australian Institute of family Studies.Google Scholar
Wyse, T. (1981) ‘The Victorian Family Support Services Pilot Programme Evaluation’ Report no.2, Department of Community Welfare Services.Google Scholar