No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
The Ecology of Foster Care – Resilience and Adaptation into Adulthood
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 01 June 2018
Abstract
This paper identifies some of the key debates about the evidence from outcomes for children placed in foster care, the challenging issues in the design of the system, how it operates and what the outcomes for children look like. The paper explores foster care as being based in the evolution of the human species in its capacity to adapt, problem-solve and identify resources through cooperative effort between individuals and social groupings with the family as key. An essential attribute of families and parenting is the ability to form close, meaningful and sustained relationships that provide security, stability and opportunity, including connectedness to the community and the resources that are a part of this. Family forms the basis for the child being able to access personal, social, cultural and economic capital both in the present and into the future. One of the serious issues for foster care is the short-term basis of that commitment and, even when it lasts over the longer term, the care arrangement typically ends as the child reaches adulthood. These issues are explored through the concept of resilience and place foster care within an ecological framework that evolves over time.
- Type
- Commentary
- Information
- Children Australia , Volume 43 , Special Issue 2: Understanding Outcomes for Care Experienced Children , June 2018 , pp. 95 - 104
- Copyright
- Copyright © The Author(s) 2018
References
Ainsworth, F., & Hansen, P. (2014). Family foster care: Can it survive the evidence? Children Australia, 39 (2), 87–92. doi:10.1017/cha.2014.5Google Scholar
Broadhurst, K., Mason, C., Bedston, S., Alrouh, B., Morriss, L., McQuarrie, T., . . . Kershaw, S. (2017). Vulnerable birth mothers and recurrent care proceedings: Final summary report. Retrieved from https://www.nuffieldfoundation.org/sites/default/files/files/rc-final-summary-report-v1_6.pdfGoogle Scholar
Cassidy, J., & Shaver, P. (2018). Handbook of attachment: Theory, research, and clinical applications (3rd ed.). New York: Guildford Press.Google Scholar
Felitti, V., Anda, R., Nordenberg, D., Williamson, D., Spitz, A., Edwards, V., . . . Marks, J. (1998). Relationship of childhood abuse and household dysfunction to many of the leading causes of death in adults. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 14 (4), 245–258. doi:10.1016/S0749-3797(98)00017-8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Giby, K., Vaillancourt, R., Varughese, N., Vadeboncoeur, C., & Pouliot, A. (2014). Use of methadone for opioid weaning in children: Prescribing practices and trends. The Canadian Journal of Hospital Pharmacy, 67 (2), 149–156.Google Scholar
Gypen, L., Vanderfaeillie, J., De Maeyer, S., Belenger, L., & Van Holen, F. (2017). Outcomes of children who grew up in foster care: Systematic review. Children and Youth Services Review, 76, 74–83. doi:10.1016/j.childyouth.2017.02.035.Google Scholar
Heard, D., & Lake, B. (2009). The challenge of attachment for caregiving. London: Karnac Books.Google Scholar
Hook, J. L., & Courtney, M. E. (2011). Employment outcomes of former foster youth as young adults: The importance of human, personal, and social capital. Children and Youth Services Review, 33 (10), 1855–1865. doi:10.1016/j.childyouth.2011.05.004.Google Scholar
Kempe, C. H., Silverman, F. N., Steele, B. F., Droegemueller, W., & Silver, H. K. (1962). The battered-child syndrome. Journal of the American Medical Association, 181, 7–24.Google ScholarPubMed
Maclean, M. J., Sims, S., O'Donnell, M., & Gilbert, R. (2016). Out-of-home care versus in-home care for children who have been maltreated: A systematic review of health and wellbeing outcomes. Child Abuse Review, 25 (4), 251–272. doi:10.1002/car.2437.Google Scholar
McCluskey, U. (2005). To be met as a person: The dynamics of attachment in professional encounters. London: Karnac.Google Scholar
McSherry, D., & Fargas Malet, M. (2017). Family foster care: Let's not throw the baby out with the bathwater. Children Australia, 42 (3), 217–221. doi:10.1017/cha.2017.23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pecora, P., Kessler, R., Williams, J., Downs, A., English, D., White, J., & O'Brien, K. (2010). What works in foster care? Key components of success from the northwest foster care alumni study. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Sinclair, I., Baker, C., Lee, J., & Gibbs, I. (2007). The pursuit of permanence: A study of the English care system. London: Jessica Kingsley.Google Scholar
Stewart, C. J., Kum, H.-C., Barth, R. P., & Duncan, D. F. (2014). Former foster youth: Employment outcomes up to age 30. Children and Youth Services Review, 36, 220–229. doi:10.1016/j.childyouth.2013.11.024.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
The Education Committee (2017). Fostering. House of Commons. Retrieved from https://publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm201719/cmselect/cmeduc/340/34002.htmGoogle Scholar
Wade, R., Becker, B., Bevans, B., Ford, D., & Forrest, C. (2017). Development and evaluation of a short adverse childhood experiences measure. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 52 (2), 163–172. doi:10.1016/j.amepre.2016.09.033.Google Scholar
Ward, H. (2009). Patterns of instability: Moves within the care system, their reasons, contexts and consequences. Children and Youth Services Review, 31 (10), 1113–1118. doi:10.1016/j.childyouth.2009.07.009.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ward, H. (2011). Continuities and discontinuities: Issues concerning the establishment of a persistent sense of self amongst care leavers. Children and Youth Services Review, 33 (12), 2512–2518. doi:10.1016/j.childyouth.2011.08.028.Google Scholar
Zarrett, N., & Eccles, J. (2006). The passage to adulthood: Challenges of late adolescence. New Directions for Youth Development, 2006 (111), 13–28. doi:10.1002/yd.179.Google Scholar