Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-8ctnn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T12:28:31.558Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Contextual Dimensions of Fostering

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 February 2016

Len Tierney  and
Angela Were
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Child welfare workers express criticism of the child-in-isolation model of child welfare practice. At the same time, however, they often persist with a “foster mother-in-isolation” model of fostering. The authors of this paper were conscious of an increasing interest in fostering by policy makers who however, often seemed to see little difference between the “staffing” implications of fostering and of family day care. This way of thinking about fostering is at odds with practitioner’s experience. A small scale empirical study was initiated which posed the question “Who are foster families”. The findings from this study make it clear that foster families have qualities and methods of functioning which become evident only when the foster family is understood as a whole and not merely as a foster mother who has connected to her various dependents beside the foster child. An appreciation that there are “foster families” and not just foster mothers actively engaged in the fostering process can make for more sensitive welfare policies and more appropriate service delivery models.

Type
Research Article
Information
Children Australia , Volume 16 , Issue 3 , 1991 , pp. 7 - 11
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1991

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Altrocchi, J. (1988) “Happy, Traditional and Companionate Families”, Social Casework, Sept. 1988.Google Scholar
Angell, R.C. (1936) The Family encounters the Depression, Scribners: N.Y. Google Scholar
Berridge, D. & Cleaver, H. (1987) Foster Family Breakdown, Blackwell: Oxford.Google Scholar
Cavan, Ruth & Ranck, K.R. (1938) The Family and the Depression, University of Chicago Press: Chicago.Google Scholar
Elder, Glen (1978) “Family history and the Life Course”, in Hareven, , Tamara, Transitions: the Family and the life Course in Historical Perspectives, Academic Press: San Diego Google Scholar
Fanshel, D. (1982) “Foster Children and their Foster Parents”, in On the Road to Permanency, Child Welfare League of America: N.Y. Google Scholar
Hill, Reuben (1971) Families under stress, Greenwood Press: Conn.Google Scholar
O”Brien, T. (1984) An Organisational Study of Foster Parents and Agencies, M.S.W. Thesis, University of Melbourne.Google Scholar
Olson, David (1983) Families, Sage: Calif.Google Scholar
Rowe, George (1981) “The Developmental Conceptual Framework to the Study of the Family”, in Nye, F. Ivan & Berardo, Felix (ed.) Emerging Conceptual Frameworks in Family Analysis, Praeger: N.Y. pp.198–222 Google Scholar
Tierney, Len & Evans, Stuart Factors which Motivate Existing and Potential Foster Parents, in process, University of Melbourne.Google Scholar
Triseliotis, J. ed. (1980) New Development in Foster Care and Adoption, Routledge & Kegan Paul: London.Google Scholar
Webster, S. (1986) Caring for other people’s children, unpublished paper, Mission to Streets and Lanes: Melbourne.Google Scholar
Wiltse, Kermit (1985) “Foster Care: an Overview” in Hartman, A. & Laird, J. A Handbook of Child Welfare, MacMillan: N.Y. pp. 565–584 Google Scholar