Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-r5fsc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-01T00:13:09.815Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Child Welfare: Reception Centres, Regionalization, and Deinstitutionalization

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 February 2016

Len Tierney
Affiliation:
University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, 5052
Meryl McDowell
Affiliation:
Community Services Victoria, 55 Swanston St, Melbourne, Victoria, 3000

Extract

Between 1972 - 1980, eighteen regional offices were opened by state welfare authorities in Victoria, with the long term prospect that a comprehensive set of programmes would be developed in each region. This is part of an extensive policy change in which the reception of children into care will proceed by more diverse and local arrangements. Safe custody options already include small residential units and foster care and the very term “reception centre” is no longer part of official language. Substantial progress has been made along these lines and of the two central reception centres, Allambie (25-150 residents) is in the process of being closed and Baltara (45-70 residents) is to be redeveloped. In the most recently published planning documents redevelopment of these facilities had been anticipated by December 1990.1 However, not a great deal is known about the population of these two centres, about reception processes and why some children proceed quickly through the process and others do not. This paper examines the present status of reception centres in Victoria and reports upon a preliminary study of the reception centre population for the period 1986-1987. An argument is made that there is a case for revising reception policy and practice not only in existing centres but, in proposed new facilities and for giving more attention to services, for children and families who present with unusual difficulties.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1990

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. State Wide Services Redevelopment Plan 1988. Community Services Victoria, Victorian Government Printer 1988.Google Scholar
2. See Child Welfare Practice and Legislation Review Report Vic. Government Printer, Melbourne 1984 and Social Justice: The Next 4 Years 1985 Election Platform. Australian Labor Party, Victorian Branch, Melbourne 1985.Google Scholar
3. Protective Services for Children in Victoria. An Interim Report. (Presented by Mr. Justice Fogarty and Delys Sargeant) Feb. 1989. Melbourne Victoria pp. 111112.Google Scholar
4. The Development of Regional Self Sufficiency Plans in Reception and Long Term Care C.S.V. Melbourne September, 1988 p.1.Google Scholar
5. Ohlin, L.E. Coates, R.B. and Miller, A.D. Radical Correctional Reform. A Case Study of the Massachusetts Youth Correctional System. Harvard Educational Review. Vol. 44 No. 1. Feb 1974 pp. 91 ff. Bachrach L. “Deinstitutionalization: An Analytical Review and Sociological Perspective” in National Institute of Mental Health: Conference on Committee Reports and Analytical Reviews of Literature D, No. 4. Washington DC. U.S. Government Printing Office 1976 pp. 10-17 Ohlin L.E. Coates, R.B. and Miller A.D. Radical Correctional Reform. A case Study of the Massachusett Youth Correctional System. Harvard Educational Review Vol. 44 No. 1. Feb 1974 pp. 91 ff. Bachrach L. “Deinstitutionalizaton. An Analytic Review and Sociological Perspective” in National Institute of Mental Health: Conference on Committee Reports and Analytical Reviews of Literature D, No. 4. Washington D.C. U.S. Government Printing Office 1976 pp. 10-17.Google Scholar
6. Arnaud, J. and Mack, R.The Deinstitutionalization of Status Offenders in Massachusetts. The Role of the Private Sector” in Handler, J.F. and Zatz, J. (ed) Neither Angels Nor Thieves: Studies in Deinstitutionalization of Status Offenders. Washington D.C. National Academy Press 1982.Google Scholar
7. Lerman, Paul, “Trends and Issues in the Deinstitutionalization of Youth in TroubleCrime and Delinquency, Vol. 26 No. 3 July 1980 p.282 Google Scholar
8. Lerman, PTrends and Issues in the Deinstitutionalization of Youth in TroubleCrime and Delinquency, Vol. 26, No. 3 July 1980 p. 282 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
9. Janchili, M.Services for Special Populations of Children” in McGowan, B. and Meezan, W. (ed) Child Welfare; Current Dilemmas Future Directions, F.E. Peacock Illinois 1983 Google Scholar
10. Kadushin, A. Child Welfare Services, 3rd ed Macmillan. N.Y. 1980, p. 583.Google Scholar
11. Parker, R.A. (ed) Caring for Separated Children, Plan, Procedures and Priorities MacMillan London 1980 p. 14.Google Scholar
12. Parker, R.A. (ed) Caring for Separated Children, Plan, Procedures and Priorities MacMillan London 1980 p. 107 Google Scholar
13. Gardiner, Simon, Children Experiencing Long Stays in Allambie and Baltara, Unpublished paper prepared for the Department of Community Services, Victoria 1985 p.1 Google Scholar
14. Simpson, S. Allambie / Baltara Population Study North East Suburbs Regional Centre Department of Community Services, Victoria 1986.Google Scholar
15. McFadden, E.J.Practice In Foster Care” in Laird, J. and Hartman, A. (ed) A Handbook of Child Welfare, Context, Knowledge and Practice, The Free Press N.Y. 1985, p. 585616.Google Scholar
16. Practice Standards in Child Welfare. Australian Association of Social Workers, Victorian Branch 1989, p.14.Google Scholar
17. Tiffen, 1985, Campbell 1987. (Tiffen, R. Cases Found, Opportunities Lost, M.S.W. Thesis. Melbourne University 1985, Campbell L.M. Case Planning in Child and Family Welfare, Ph.D. Dissertation Melbourne University 1987.Google Scholar
18. Maluccio, A.N. Fein, E. and Olmstead, K. Permanency Planning For Children. Concept and Methods. Tavistock London 1986 p. 93.Google Scholar
19. Urie, Bronfenbrenner The Ecology of Human Development Harvard 1979.Google Scholar
20.Ecology and Social Work” in Carel, Germain (ed) Social Work Practice People and Environments Columbia N.Y., 1979.Google Scholar
21. Stein, T.J. and Rzepnicki, T. Decision Making at Child Welfare Intake Child Welfare League of America New York 1983.Google Scholar
22. Meryl, McDowell Children Who Wait, M.S.W. Thesis. University of Melbourne 1989 Google Scholar
23. Fitzharris, T.L. The Foster Children of California: Profiles of 10,000 Children, Parents and Social Workers. California Association of Services for Children. Sacramento 1985.Google Scholar
24. Maluccio, A. et al Permanency Planning For Children. Concepts and Methods 1986 op cit. p. 93.Google Scholar
25. Provision of Court Reports by C.S.V. 10.2.89 C.S.V. Melbourne pp. 17.Google Scholar
26. Protective Services for Children in Victoria. An Interim Report, Melbourne Victoria p. 107.Google Scholar
27. Bronfenbrenner, U. The Ecology of Human Development op cit p.26.Google Scholar
28. Fanshel, D. Finch, S., and Grundy, J. Serving children with unstable life histories in foster family care, 1987 Unpublished Ms. personal communication p.30.Google Scholar
29. Barth, R. and Berry, M.Outcomes of Child Welfare Services Under Permanency PlanningSocial Service Review, Vol. 61, No. 1, 1987 pp. 7190 Sosin, Michael R. “Delivering Services Under Permanency Planning” Social Service Review, Vol. 61, No. 4, pp.272-90 1987. “Debate with Authors” Social Service Review, Vol. 62, No. 4, pp. 705-709 1987.Google Scholar
30. Michael, Sosin “Delivering Services Under Permanency Planning. 1987 op cit.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
31. Tiffen, R. Cases Found, Opportunities Lost, M.S.W. thesis. University of Melbourne 1985, p. 32, p. 495, Campbell, Lynda M. Case Planning in Child and Family Welfare, Phd. Dissertation University of Melbourne 1987.Google Scholar