Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-vdxz6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-01T00:47:18.839Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Challenges posed by kinship care: A study focussing on New South Wales

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 February 2016

Leonie Gibbons  and
Jan Mason
Leonie Gibbons
Affiliation:
School of Applied Social and Human Sciences, College of Social and Health Sciences, University of Western Sydney, Locked Bag 1797 Penrith South DC, NSW 1797. Email: [email protected]
Jan Mason
Affiliation:
Director School of Applied Social and Human Sciences Director, Social Justice and Social Change Research Centre, University of Western Sydney, Locked Bag 1797 Penrith South DC, NSW 1797. Email: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Kinship care as a formal placement option has been steadily increasing over recent years, particularly in New South Wales. This paper draws on a report of research on kinship care in New South Wales, in which the two authors participated (Mason et al, 2002). In conducting the research, qualitative and quantitative methods were used to explore both ‘top down’ perspectives (from policy documents and statistics) and ‘bottom up’ perspectives (from child protection practitioners and those who experience policy as service recipients – kinship carers, young people in kinship care and parents of children in kinship care).

In this paper we briefly outline the research and discuss findings relating to definitions of kinship care, the extent of kinship care in NSW, decision making around the placement of children in kinship care, reasons given by participants for kinship care, and support for carers.

Type
Research Article
Information
Children Australia , Volume 28 , Issue 4 , 2003 , pp. 12 - 18
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2003

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Association of Children's Welfare Agencies (ACWA) (1998) Children Out of Home, Analysis of Substitute Care Data, 1991/92 to 1995/96, ACWA report, Sydney.Google Scholar
Australian Institute of Health and Welfare (1998,) Child Protection Australia 1996-97, Child Welfare Series No. 21, AIHW, Canberra.Google Scholar
Australian Institute of Health and Welfare (2002) Child Protection Australia 2000-2001, Child Welfare Series No. 29, AIHW, Canberra.Google Scholar
Gleeson, J. (1996) ‘Kinship Care as a Child Welfare Service: The Policy Debate in an Era of Welfare Reform’, Child Welfare, Vol. LXXV, No. 5.Google Scholar
Greeflf, R. (1999) ‘Kinship, Fostering, Obligations and the State’, in Greeff, R. (ed), Fostering Kinship, An International perspective on kinship care, Ashgate Publishing Limited, England.Google Scholar
Hornby, H., Zeller, D. & Karraker, D. (1996) ‘Kinship Care in America: What Outcomes Should Policy Seek’, Child Welfare, Vol. LXXVI, No.5.Google Scholar
Ingram, C. (1996) ‘Kinship Care: From Last Resort to First Choice’, Child Welfare, Vol. LXXV, No.5.Google Scholar
Mason, J., Falloon, J., Gibbons, L., Spence, N. & Scott, E. (2002) Understanding Kinship Care, ACWA, Sydney.Google Scholar
McFadden, E. (1998) ‘Kinship Care in the United States’, Adoption and Fostering, Vol. 22, No.3.Google Scholar
Shlonsky, A. & Berrick, (2001) ‘Assessing and promoting quality in kin and nonkin foster care’, Social Service Review, Chicago, March.Google Scholar
Testa, M., Shook, K., Cohen, L. & Woods, M. (1996) ‘Permanency Planning Options for Children in Formal Kinship Care’, Child Welfare, Vol. LXXV, No.5.Google Scholar
Watson, E. & Mears, J. (1999) Women, Work and Care of the Elderly, Ashgate, Sydney.Google Scholar
Worrell, J. (1999) Kinship/Whanau Care: The Placement of the Future?, paper delivered at the International Foster Care Conference, Melbourne, July.Google Scholar