The model outlined in the paper by Partridge, Casswell
and Richardson is an interesting one. Its strengths are
particularly the multidisciplinary nature of the assessment
and its extension over a period of time, allowing for the
assessment to be also a therapeutic process. It stands in
contrast to many single-handed expert assessments carried
out as a cross sectional view of the family at one particular
point.
The decision not to meet with the children is understandable on the basis that the children may well have
been seen by other professionals. However, since parenting is a dyadic interaction it can only be observed by
meeting with both parents and children together. The
notion of risk and assessment of risk is broader than the
risk posed by an adult or parent to a generic child. Beyond
a capacity to injure and physically or sexually abuse, risk
extends to emotional abuse or injury and emotional
neglect, insensitivity or inability to meet the child's
developmental needs. An assessment of these capacities is
best related to the needs of particular children and includes
issues of attachment. These can only be assessed by
meeting with the children and/or the children and parents
together.
The addition to the team of an adult psychiatrist with a
particular interest in personality and the influence of early
experiences on adult functioning has been found to be of
great value.
An alternative model is the multi-family intensive assessment process, during which several families attend
together for a short period of time and during which intra-family interactions as well as group processes are observed.