Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2brh9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T04:11:42.516Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Defining Dyslexia

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 February 1998

Max Coltheart
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, Macquarie University, Sydney, NSW 2109, Australia
Nancy Ewald Jackson
Affiliation:
College of Education, 361 Lindquist Ctr. N., University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA 52242, U.S.A.
Get access

Abstract

We argue against defining dyslexia as requiring by definition the presence of demonstrable phonological difficulty, and also against defining it in relation to exclusion criteria. Instead, we suggest that what matters is evaluating any child's set of reading subskills against age-related norms for those subskills. We also argue that in considering the causes of reading difficulty it is essential to distinguish between proximal cause (some abnormality in the information-processing system that the child is using to read) and distal cause (the reason for this system being abnormal). The same proximal cause (e.g. poor phonic knowledge) can be the product of different distal causes in different children (e.g. the distal cause might be constitutional, environmental, or educational).

Type
Forum on Dyslexia
Copyright
© 1998 Association for Child Psychology and Psychiatry

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)