Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t8hqh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-23T21:45:54.707Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Political Background of the Foundation of the Bayreuth Festival, 1876

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  16 December 2008

David C. Large
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Symposium: Government, Social Structure, and Cultural Life in Germany
Information
Central European History , Volume 11 , Issue 2 , June 1978 , pp. 162 - 172
Copyright
Copyright © Conference Group for Central European History of the American Historical Association 1978

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Newman, Ernest, The Life of Richard Wagner (New York, 1946), 4: 475, n. 18.Google Scholar

2. Wagner to Emil Heckel, Jan. 19, 1874. Kerr, Caroline V., ed., The Bayreuth Letters of Richard Wagner (Boston, 1912), p. 151.Google Scholar

3. In his “Rückblick auf die Bühnenfestspiele des Jahres 1876,” Wagner wrote: “In regard to artistic matters I did not err [in the premier festival] … but my hope also to awaken a national interest proved certainly illusory.” Wagner, Richard, Gesammelte Schriften und Dichtungen (Leipzig, n.d.), 10: 104.Google Scholar

4. Mayer, Hans, Richard Wagner in Bayreuth, 1876–1976 (New York, 1976), p. 37.Google Scholar

5. Newman, 4: 292.

6. Ibid., pp. 293–96.

7. Gutman, Robert W., Richard Wagner: The Man, His Mind, and His Music (Harmondsworth, England, 1971), pp. 342–69.Google Scholar

8. Ibid., pp. 374–75.

9. Ibid., p. 347.

10. von Westernhagen, Curt, “Wagner und das Reich,” in Strobel, Otto, ed., Schriften der Richard Wagner Forschungstätte (Karlsruhe, 1943), p. 46.Google Scholar

11. Ibid., p. 50; Gutman, p. 382.

12. Gutman, p. 376.

13. Wagner to Feustel, F., 06 14, 1877.Google Scholar Quoted in Karbaum, Michael, Studien zur Geschichte der Bayreuther Festspiele (Regensburg, 1976), p. 29.Google Scholar

14. Wagner's increasing disillusionment with Ludwig is vividly recorded in his wife's newly published diaries. For example, Richard told Cosima at one point that he regarded his dependence on Ludwig as an “unbearable disgrace.” Wagner, Cosima, Die Tagebücher (Munich, 1976), 1: 422.Google Scholar

15. Ibid., p. 38.

16. Westernhagen, pp. 52–53.

17. Newman, 4: 275–76.

18. Ibid., p. 280.

19. Wagner, Cosima, 1: 377–78.Google Scholar

20. Ibid., p. 384.

21. Ibid.

22. Richard told Cosima that despite its lack of concrete results, the meeting with Bismarck remained “of the highest value for me.” Ibid.

23. Marie von Schleinitz's efforts on behalf of Wagner are chronicled in her correspondence with Cosima Wagner. These letters are to be found in the Richard Wagner Archiv des Hauses Wahnfried. See also the obituary on Schleinitz by von Wollzogen, Hans in Bayreuther Blätter, 1912, p. 169.Google Scholar

24. On the Schleinitz salon see Schüler, Winifried, Der Bayreuther Kreis von seiner Entstehung bis zum Ausgang der Wilhelminischen Ära (Münster, 1971), p. 127.Google Scholar

25. Wagner, Cosima, 1: 1063.Google Scholar

26. The best source on the Wagner Clubs is Schüler, pp. 57–62.

27. This parallel is briefly explored in Karbaum, p. 19.

28. Ibid., pp. 31–32.

29. Wagner went out of his way to insult his most faithful supporters. The most notorious case of this is analyzed in Gay, Peter, “Hermann Levi: A Study in Service and Self-Hatred,” in Freud, Jews and Other Germans (New York, 1978), pp. 189–230.Google Scholar Cosima Wagner's diaries show that Wagner also resented his dependence on Jewish financial support through the Wagner Clubs. See Wagner, Cosima, 1: 486, 525.Google Scholar

30. Wagner, Cosima, 1: 629.Google Scholar

31. The Kaiser did, however, take out twenty-five subscriptions in his own name.

32. Wagner, Cosima, 1: 698.Google Scholar

33. Westernhagen, p. 60.

34. Wagner, Richard, Gesammelte Schriften, 10: 6.Google Scholar

35. Westernhagen delicately calls Bismarck's attitude toward Wagner “a certain personal prejudice.” Westernhagen, p. 61.

36. Gutman, p. 455.

37. Westernhagen, p. 61.

38. Wagner to Heckel, Jan. 19, 1874. The Bayreuth Letters, p. 152.

39. Westernhagen, p. 61.

40. Ibid.

41. The text of Ludwig's letter is quoted in Newman, 4: 408.

42. The Bayreuth Letters, p. 238.

43. Wagner, Cosima, 1: 964–65.Google Scholar Wagner told Cosima that “the very fact that only a man like Bismarck can help us shows that we are lost” (p. 966).

44. Ibid., p. 970.

45. Newman, 4: 415–19.

46. Mayer, Hans, pp. 25–38Google Scholar; Karbaum, Michael, p. 23.Google Scholar

47. Wagner, Cosima, 2: 41.Google Scholar

48. Eulenburg-Hertefeld, Philipp, Aus 50 Jahren (Berlin, 1923), p. 58.Google Scholar

49. On Wagner's financial situation after the first festival, see Mayer, pp. 40–42; Karbaum, pp. 25–31; Newman, 4: 540–43.

50. The best source on the political evolution of Bayreuth in the period between the first festival and the rise of Hitler is Schüler, Der Bayreuther Kreis.