Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-r5fsc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-27T09:56:52.806Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Timing of removal of pacing wires following paediatric cardiac surgery

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 October 2007

Victoria Jowett ,
Nicholas Hayes ,
Shankar Sridharan ,
Philip Rees  and
Duncan Macrae
Victoria Jowett*
Affiliation:
Department of Paediatric Cardiology, Royal Brompton Hospital, London, United Kingdom Department of Cardiology, Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children, London, United Kingdom
Nicholas Hayes
Affiliation:
Department of Paediatric Cardiology, Royal Brompton Hospital, London, United Kingdom
Shankar Sridharan
Affiliation:
Department of Cardiology, Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children, London, United Kingdom
Philip Rees
Affiliation:
Department of Cardiology, Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children, London, United Kingdom
Duncan Macrae
Affiliation:
Department of Paediatric Cardiology, Royal Brompton Hospital, London, United Kingdom
*
Correspondence to: Dr Victoria Jowett, Department of Cardiology, Great Ormond Street Hospital, Great Ormond Street, London WC1N 3JH, United Kingdom. Tel: +44 20 7405 9200; Fax: +44 20 7762 6727; E-mail: [email protected] or [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Background

Temporary percutaneous epicardial pacing wires are routinely placed in children following cardiac surgery. There is uncertainty in clinical practice about the optimum timing for their removal, and practice varies widely both within and between different institutions.

Aim

The aim of our study was to describe the use of temporary pacing in children undergoing cardiac surgery.

Methods

We performed a prospective audit of 140 children following cardiac surgery in two institutions. Information on diagnosis, surgical procedure, occurrence of arrhythmias, use of pacing wires, timing of removal of the wire, and complications related to removal was recorded on a daily basis from clinical records.

Results

We studied 140 patients undergoing a total of 141 operations. Of these, 39 (28%) required pacing postoperatively. In 38, pacing was required within the first 24 hours. One patient, who was in nodal rhythm for the first 24 hours, required pacing on the second postoperative day, while 29 patients required pacing beyond the first 24 hours. No patient in sinus rhythm on the first postoperative day required new pacing after this time. The median time to removal of the pacing wires was 4.5 days, with an inter-quartile range from 2 to 9 days. Complications included malfunction of atrial wires in 2 patients.

Conclusions

Our study shows that no patient who was in sinus rhythm for the first 24 hours post-operatively required pacing before their discharge from hospital. This suggests that, in those patients in a stable state of sinus rhythm, and who have not required pacing within the first 24 hours, it may be safe to remove pacing wires after 24 hours. This could be timed to coincide with the removal of chest drains, thus avoiding the need for multiple distressing procedures.

Keywords

Arrhythmiapacingchildren
Type
Original Article
Information
Cardiology in the Young , Volume 17 , Issue 5 , October 2007 , pp. 512 - 516
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2007

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1.Valsangiacomo, E, Schmid, ER, Schupbach, RW, et al. . Early postoperative arrhythmias after cardiac operation in children. Ann Thorac Surg 2002; 74: 792–796.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
2.JCHastings, 3rd, Robicsek, F. Clinical significance of epicardial pacing wire cultures. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1993; 105: 165–167.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
3.Gal, ThJ, Chaet, MS, Novitzky, D. Laceration of a saphenous vein graft by an epicardial pacemaker wire. J Cardiovasc Surg 1998; 39: 221–222.Google Scholar
4.Johnson, LG, Brown, OF, Alligood, MR. Complications of epicardial pacing wire removal. J Cardiovasc Nurs 1993; 7: 32–40.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
5.Carroll, KC, Reeves, LM, Andersen, G, et al. . Risks associated with removal of epicardial pacing wires after cardiac surgery. Am J Crit Care 1998; 7: 444–449.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
6.Gentry, WH, Hassan, AA. Complications of retained epicardial pacing wires: an unusual bronchial foreign body. Ann Thorac Surg 1993; 56: 1391–1393.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
7.Bolton, JW, JrMayer, JE. Unusual complication of temporary pacing wires in children. Ann Thorac Surg 1992; 54: 769–770.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
8.Elmi, F, Tullo, NG, Khalighi, K. Natural history and predictors of temporary epicardial pacemaker wire function in patients after open heart surgery. Cardiology 2002; 98: 175–180.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
9.Pfammatter, JP, Bachmann, DC, Wagner, BP, et al. . Early postoperative arrhythmias after open-heart procedures in children with congenital heart disease. Pediatr Crit Care Med 2001; 2: 217–222.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
10.Villain, E, Ouarda, F, Beyler, C, Sidi, D, Abid, FPredictive factors for late complete atrioventricular block after surgical treatment for congenital cardiopathy Arch Mal Coeur Vaiss 2003; 96: 495–498.Google Scholar