Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gbm5v Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T20:34:01.664Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Subclinical rheumatic valvitis: a long-term follow-up

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 May 2005

Cristina Costa Duarte Lanna
Affiliation:
Division of Paediatric Cardiology, Department of Paediatrics, Hospital das Clínicas, Federal University of Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, Brazil
Edward Tonelli
Affiliation:
Division of Paediatric Cardiology, Department of Paediatrics, Hospital das Clínicas, Federal University of Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, Brazil
Marcio Vinicius Lins Barros
Affiliation:
Division of Paediatric Cardiology, Department of Paediatrics, Hospital das Clínicas, Federal University of Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, Brazil
Eugenio Marcos Andrade Goulart
Affiliation:
Division of Paediatric Cardiology, Department of Paediatrics, Hospital das Clínicas, Federal University of Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, Brazil
Cleonice Carvalho Coelho Mota
Affiliation:
Division of Paediatric Cardiology, Department of Paediatrics, Hospital das Clínicas, Federal University of Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, Brazil

Abstract

In order prospectively to investigate the frequency and evolution of subclinical valvitis, we selected 40 consecutive patients suffering their initial attack of rheumatic fever, seen in our clinic from 1992 to 1994, and followed-up until 2001, with a mean period of follow-up of 8.1 years, and a standard deviation of 0.6 year. We also assembled a matched control group of 37 healthy children and adolescents. We discovered a murmur of mitral regurgitation in 28 (70.0%) of the patients. In 3 (7.5%) of these patients, there was also a murmur of aortic regurgitation. In the group of 28 symptomatic patients, Doppler echocardiography showed mitral regurgitation in all, and aortic regurgitation in 17. In the group of 12 patients without clinical evidence of cardiac involvement, Doppler echocardiography identified mitral regurgitation in 2, isolated in one and associated with aortic regurgitation in the other. Thus, the frequency of subclinical valvitis was 16.7%. In patients with subclinical valvitis only the aortic regurgitation regressed during the period of follow-up. In the group of 28 symptomatic patients, mitral regurgitation disappeared in 6 (21.4%), aortic regurgitation in 7 of the 17 having this feature (41.2%), while 2 patients (7.1%) developed mitral stenosis. The sensitivity and specificity of cardiac auscultation were, respectively, 93.3%, with 95% confidence intervals between 72.3% and 97.4%, and 100%, with 95% confidence intervals between 65.5% and 100%, for the diagnosis of mitral regurgitation, and 16.7%, with 95% confidence intervals between 4.4% and 42.3%, and 100%, with 95% confidence intervals between 81.5% and 100%, for that of aortic regurgitation. We conclude that the Doppler echocardiogram is an important means of diagnosing and assessing the evolution of subclinical rheumatic valvar lesions, which are not always transient. We suggest that Doppler echocardiography should be performed in all patients with acute rheumatic fever. Subclinical valvitis should be considered as mild carditis, provided that strict criterions are observed in the differential diagnosis from physiological regurgitation, and Doppler echocardiographic findings are analyzed in the context of the other manifestations of the disease.

Type
Original Article
Copyright
© 2003 Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Dodu SRA, Bothig S. Fiebre reumática y cardiopatia reumática en los países en desarrollo. Foro Mundial de la Salud 1989; 10: 198208.Google Scholar
Markowitz M. The decline of rheumatic fever: role of medical intervention. J Pediatr 1985; 106: 545550.Google Scholar
Grover A, Dhavan A, Iyengar IS, Wahi PL, Ganguly NK. Epidemiology of rheumatic fever and rheumatic heart disease in a rural community in northern India. Bull WHO 1993; 71: 5965.Google Scholar
Vardi P, Markiewicz W, Weiss Y, Levi J, Benderly A. Clinical-echocardiographic correlations in acute rheumatic fever. Pediatrics 1983; 71: 830834.Google Scholar
Steinfeld L, Ritter S, Rappaport H, Martinez E. Silent mitral regurgitation unmasked by Doppler studies. Circulation 1986; (Suppl II): 385.Google Scholar
Veasy LG, Wiedmeier SE, Orsmond GS, et al. Resurgence of acute rheumatic fever in the intermountain area of the United States. N Eng J Med 1987; 316: 421427.Google Scholar
Folger GM Jr, Hajar R. Doppler echocardiographic findings of mitral and aortic valvar regurgitation in children manifesting only rheumatic arthritis. Am J Cardiol 1989; 63: 12781280.Google Scholar
Folger GM Jr, Hajar R, Robida A, Hajar HA. Occurrence of valvar heart disease in acute rheumatic fever without evident carditis: colour-flow Doppler identification. Br Heart J 1992; 67: 434438.Google Scholar
Ty ET, Ortiz EE. M-mode, cross-sectional and color flow Doppler echocardiographic findings in acute rheumatic fever. Cardiol Young 1992; 2: 229335.Google Scholar
Veasy LG, Tani LY, Hill HR. Persistence of acute rheumatic fever in the intermountain area of the United States. J Pediatr 1994; 24: 916.Google Scholar
Abernethy M, Bass N, Sharpe N, et al. Doppler echocardiography and the early diagnosis of carditis in acute rheumatic fever. Aust NZ J Med 1994; 24: 530535.Google Scholar
Wilson NJ, Neutze JM. Echocardiographic diagnosis of subclinical carditis in acute rheumatic fever. Int J Cardiol 1995; 50: 16.Google Scholar
Mota CCC, Meira ZAM. Rheumatic Fever. Cardiol Young 1999; 8: 98109.Google Scholar
Hilário MOE, Andrade JL, Gasparian AB, Carvalho AC, Andrade CT, Len CA. The value of echocardiography in the diagnosis and follow-up of rheumatic carditis in children and adolescents: a 2 years prospective study. J Rheumatol 2000; 27: 10821086.Google Scholar
Figueroa FE, Fernandez MS, Valdes P, et al. Prospective comparison of clinical and echocardiographic diagnosis of rheumatic carditis: long term follow up of patients with subclinical disease. Heart 2001; 85: 407410.Google Scholar
Özkutlu S, Ayabacan C, Saraclar M. Can subclinical valvitis by echocardiography be accepted as evidence of carditis in the diagnosis of acute rheumatic fever? Cardiol Young 2001; 11: 255260.Google Scholar
Yoshida K, Yoshiwaka J, Shakudo M, et al. Color Doppler evaluation of valvar regurgitation in normal subjects. Circulation 1988; 78: 840847.Google Scholar
Choong CY, Abascal VM, Weyman J, et al. Prevalence of valvar regurgitation by Doppler echocardiography in patients with structurally normal hearts by two-dimensional echocardiography. Am Heart J 1989; 117: 636642.Google Scholar
Brand A, Dollberg S, Keren A. The Prevalence of valvar regurgitation in children with structurally normal hearts: a color Doppler echocardiographic study. Am Heart J 1992; 123: 177180.Google Scholar
Mattos SS, Severi R, Cavalcanti CV, Freire MF, Brindeiro Filho D. Valvar regurgitation in normal children: is it clinically significant? Cardiol Young 1992; 2: 291297.Google Scholar
American Heart Association – Committee on Rheumatic Fever, Endocarditis, and Kawasaki Disease of the Council on Cardiovascular Disease in the Young. Guidelines for the diagnosis of rheumatic fever-Jones criteria, 1992 update. JAMA 1992; 268: 20692073.
Grayburn PA, Smith MD, Handshoe R, Friedman BJ, Demaria AN. Detection of aortic insufficiency by standard echocardiography, pulsed Doppler echocardiography, and auscultation. Ann Int Med 1986; 104: 599605.Google Scholar
Perry GJ, Helmcke F, Nanda NC, Byard C, Soto B. Evaluation of aortic insufficiency by Doppler color flow mapping. J Am Coll Cardiol 1987; 9: 952959.Google Scholar
Feigenbaum H. Cardiopatia valvar adquirida. In: Feingenbaun H (ed.). Ecocardiografia. Roca, São Paulo, 1988, pp 273396.
Majeed HA, Yousof AM, Khuffash FA, Yusuf AR, Farwana S, Khan N. The natural history of acute rheumatic fever in Kuwait: a prospective six year follow-up report. J Chron Dis 1986; 39: 361369.Google Scholar
Jamal M, Abbas KA. Clinical profile of acute rheumatic fever in children. J Trop Pediatr 1989; 35: 1013.Google Scholar
Homer C, Shulman ST. Clinical aspects of acute rheumatic fever. J Rheumatol 1991; 18 (Suppl 29): 213.Google Scholar
Mota CCC, Meira ZMA, Graciano RN, Silva MC. Diagnostic aspects, carditis and other acute manifestations of streptococcal infection. Cadiol Young 1992; 2: 222228.Google Scholar
Al-Eissa YA, Al-Zamil FA, Al Fadley FA, Al Herbish AS, Al-Mofada SM, Al-Omair AO. Acute rheumatic fever in Saudi Arabia: mild pattern of initial attack. Pediatr Cardiol 1993; 14: 8992.Google Scholar
Meira ZMA, Castilho SRT, Barros MVL, et al. Prevalência da febre reumática em crianças de uma escola pública de Belo Horizonte. Arq Bras Cardiol 1995; 65: 331334.Google Scholar
Clark M, Keith JD. Atrioventricular conduction in acute rheumatic fever. Br Heart J 1972; 34: 472479.Google Scholar
DiSciascio G, Taranta A. Rheumatic Fever in children. Am Heart J 1980; 99: 635658.Google Scholar
Meira ZMA. Cardiopatia reumática em crianças e adolescentes: aspectos clínicos e ecoDopplercardiográficos, evolução e prognóstico (Rheumatic heart disease in children and adolescents: clinical and Doppler echocardiographic aspects , evolution and prognostic factors), Dec. 2000; Belo Horizonte, Brazil, Federal University of Minas Gerais, 270 p. Medicine PhD Thesis.