Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gbm5v Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T20:37:18.936Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Pulmonary regurgitation after percutaneous balloon valvoplasty for isolated pulmonary valvar stenosis in childhood

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 May 2005

Louisa K. H. Poon  and
Samuel Menahem
Louisa K. H. Poon
Affiliation:
Department of Cardiology, Royal Children's Hospital, Melbourne, Australia
Samuel Menahem
Affiliation:
Department of Cardiology, Royal Children's Hospital, Melbourne, Australia
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Objectives: A retrospective study was undertaken to determine the degree of pulmonary regurgitation following percutaneous balloon valvoplasty for isolated pulmonary valvar stenosis. Background: Percutaneous balloon valvoplasty is the recognised treatment of choice in pulmonary valvar stenosis with effective relief of gradient. Few studies have reviewed the degree of pulmonary regurgitation after the balloon valvoplasty. Methods: We reviewed all patients with isolated pulmonary valvar stenosis undergoing percutaneous balloon valvoplasty at a tertiary centre between December 1984 and August 1996. Those with an associated haemodynamically insignificant atrial septal defect or patent oval foramen were also included. Their medical records, echocardiograms and angiograms were studied. Colour flow Doppler was used as a semi-quantitative way of assessing the pulmonary incompetence. Results: Over the period of review, 57 procedures had been performed in 49 patients. The median age at the time of the procedure was 1.08 years, with a range from 0.01 to 13.3 years. The median period of follow-up was 5.64 years, with a range from 3.00 to 14.26 years. Immediately following the dilation of the pulmonary valve, the peak-to-peak instantaneous systolic pressure gradient was significantly reduced. Seven patients required a second dilation of the valve. Their median age at the first valvoplasty, at 0.49 year, was significantly lower than those who required only one procedure, at a median of 1.50 years. Following the valvoplasty, mild pulmonary incompetence was noted in 26 out of 42 patients the day after the procedure, but only 7% had moderate incompetence. On follow-up, there was an increase in the number of patients with moderate to severe pulmonary incompetence, from 7% to 29%. Those patients in whom the procedure was performed at a younger age had more significant pulmonary incompetence. Neither the initial gradient across the pulmonary valve, nor the size of the balloon used, were related with statistical significance to the subsequent development of pulmonary incompetence. Conclusions: The majority of the patients with congenital isolated pulmonary valvar stenosis had only a mild increase in the degree of pulmonary incompetence following a single pulmonary valvoplasty. Patients who required the procedure early in life were more likely to develop significant pulmonary incompetence. The ratio of the size of the balloon to the diameter of the valve did not significantly affect the outcome. We suggest that those patients who had more severe stenosis because of a more abnormal pulmonary valve, and hence required early intervention, were more likely to develop greater pulmonary incompetence after the valvoplasty.

Keywords

Interventional catheterizationpulmonary incompetencepaediatrics
Type
Original Article
Information
Cardiology in the Young , Volume 13 , Issue 5 , October 2003 , pp. 444 - 450
Copyright
© 2003 Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

Presented in part at the Cardiac Society of Australia and New Zealand, August 2000.

References

Teupe CHJ, Burger W, Schrader R, Zeiher AM. Late (five to nine years) follow up after balloon dilation of valvar pulmonary stenosis in adults. Am J Cardiol 1997; 80: 240–242.Google Scholar
Semb BHK, Tjonneland S, Stake G. “Balloon valvotomy” of congenital pulmonary valve stenosis with tricuspid valve insufficiency. Cardiovasc Radiol 1979; 2: 239.Google Scholar
Kan JS, White RI Jr, Mitchell SE, Gardner TJ. Percutaneous balloon valvoplasty: a new method for treating congenital pulmonary-valve stenosis. N Engl J Med 1982; 307: 540–542.Google Scholar
Rocchini AP, Kveselis DA, Crowley D, Dick M, Rosenthal A. Percutaneous balloon valvoplasty for treatment of congenital pulmonary valvar stenosis in children. J Am Coll Cardiol 1984; 3: 1005–1012.Google Scholar
Brian KO, Robert HB, Amy L, Alert R. Intermediate-term outcome after pulmonary balloon valvoplasty: comparison with a matched surgical control group. J Am Coll Cardiol 1992; 20: 169–173.Google Scholar
Rao PS, Galal O, Patnana M, Buck SH, Wilson AD. Results of three to 10 year follow up of balloon dilatation of the pulmonary valve. Heart 1998; 80: 591–595.Google Scholar
Sullivan ID, Robinson PJ, Macartney FJ, et al. Percutaneous balloon valvoplasty for pulmonary valve stenosis in infants and children. Br Heart J 1985; 54: 435–441.Google Scholar
DiSessa TG, Alpert BS, Chase NA, Birnbaum SE, Watson DC. Balloon valvoplasty in children with dysplastic pulmonary valves. Am J Cardiol 1987; 60: 405–407.Google Scholar
Chen CR, Cheng TO, Huang T, et al. Percutaneous balloon valvoplasty for pulmonic stenosis on adolescents and adults. N Engl J Med 1996; 335: 21–25.Google Scholar
Rao PS. Further observations on the effect of balloon size on the short term and intermediate term results of balloon dilatation of the pulmonary valve. Br Heart J 1988; 60: 507–511.Google Scholar
McCrindle BW, Kan JS. Long-term results after balloon pulmonary valvoplasty. Circulation 1991; 83: 1915–1922.Google Scholar
Rao PS, Fawzy ME, Solymar L, Mardini MK. Long-term results of balloon pulmonary valvoplasty of valvar pulmonic stenosis. Am Heart J 1988; 115: 1291–1296.Google Scholar
Lababidi Z, Wu JR. Percutaneous balloon pulmonary valvoplasty. Am J Cardiol 1983; 52: 560–562.Google Scholar
Kan JS, White RF, Mitchell SE, Anderson JH, Gardner TJ. Percutaneous transluminal balloon valvoplasty for pulmonary valve stenosis. Circulation 1984; 69: 554–560.Google Scholar
Takao S, Miyatake K, Izumi S, et al. Clinical implications of pulmonary regurgitation in healthy individuals: detection by cross sectional pulsed Doppler echocardiography. Br Heart J 1988; 59: 542–550.Google Scholar
Ray DG, Subramanyan R, Titus T, et al. Balloon pulmonary valvoplasty: factors determining short- and long-term results. Int J Cardiol 1993; 40: 17–25.Google Scholar
Feigenbaum H. Accurate valvar heart disease. Echocardiography. Lea & Febiger, Philadelphia, 1994, pp 297–349.
Patel AK, Rowe GG, Dhanani SP, Kosolcharoen P, Lyle LE, Thomsen JH. Pulsed Doppler echocardiography in diagnosis of pulmonary regurgitation: its value and limitations. Am J Cardiol 1982; 49: 1801–1805.Google Scholar
Vermilion RP, Snider AR, Meliones JN, Peters J, Merida-Asmus L. Pulsed Doppler evaluation of right ventricular diastolic filling in children with pulmonary valve stenosis before and after balloon valvoplasty. Am J Cardiol 1990; 66: 79–84.Google Scholar
Williams RC, Minich L, Shaddy RE, Pagotto LT, Tani LY. Comparison of Doppler echocardiography with angiography for determining the severity of pulmonary regurgitation. Am J Cardiol 2002; 89: 1438–1441.Google Scholar
John CR, Thomas JK, Barbara AB, James EL. Morphologic changes induced by dilatation of the pulmonary valve annulus with overlarge balloons in normal newborn lambs. Am J Cardiol 1984; 55: 210–214.Google Scholar