Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dk4vv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-28T18:50:25.982Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Past, present, and future of the arterial switch operation: historical review

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 January 2013

Ali Dodge-Khatami ,
Constantine Mavroudis ,
Constantine D. Mavroudis  and
Jeffrey P. Jacobs
Ali Dodge-Khatami*
Affiliation:
Division of Pediatric and Congenital Cardiac Surgery, University Heart Center, University of Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany
Constantine Mavroudis
Affiliation:
Johns Hopkins Children's Heart Surgery, Florida Hospital for Children, Orlando, Florida, United States of America
Constantine D. Mavroudis
Affiliation:
Division of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States of America
Jeffrey P. Jacobs
Affiliation:
Johns Hopkins Children's Heart Surgery, All Children's Hospital and Florida Hospital for Children, Saint Petersburg, Tampa, and Orlando, Florida, United States of America
*
Correspondence to: Dr A. Dodge-Khatami, MD, PhD, Division of Pediatric and Congenital Cardiac Surgery, University of Hamburg, Martinistrasse 52, 20246 Hamburg, Germany. Tel: +49 7410 58221; Fax: +49 7410 58275; E-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The arterial switch operation is the extant surgical correction after a long series of palliations attempted and/or successfully achieved for the treatment of discordant ventriculoarterial connections. As early as 1954, pioneers such as Mustard, Bailey, Kay, and Idriss led the way with at first disheartening failures, temporarily leading to abandoning the procedure. The first successful atrial baffle procedure in 1958 established itself as the procedure of choice for treating discordant ventriculoarterial connections, but tenacity, courage, and vision to pursue anatomic correction finally led to the first successful arterial switch in 1975 by Jatene. After a decade to perfect surgical technique and timing indications for the various anatomic subtypes, the new era of the neonatal arterial switch since the late 1980s set the very high standards that we all know and expect today. Despite excellent early and long-term survival, important residual lesions are increasingly being recognised. Expected anatomic residuals include supravalvar pulmonary stenosis, neoaortic valve insufficiency, and coronary ostial stenosis. Reinterventions and rare, but challenging surgical reoperations address these residual findings with satisfactory outcomes. Quality of life into young adulthood is satisfactory, but functional problems include reduced exercise capacity, diffuse coronary insufficiency, and neurodevelopmental shortcomings, of which the true incidence and potential clinical implications are still unknown. The arterial switch is a spectacular anatomic correction for a once lethal condition and currently the best surgical solution for patients with discordant ventriculoarterial connections. It is, however, far from a true cure; closer and ongoing follow-up for future care will continue to be required.

Type
Original Article
Information
Cardiology in the Young , Volume 22 , Issue 6: A Lifelong Interdisciplinary Approach to Common Arterial Trunk, Transposition of the Great Arteries, and Other Evolving Challenges in Paediatric and Congenital Cardiac Disease , December 2012 , pp. 724 - 731
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2012

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Baillie, M, Clift, W. A Series of Engravings, Accompanied with Explanations, Which are Intended to Illustrate the Morbid Anatomy of Some of the Most Important Parts of the Human Body; Divided into Ten Fasciculi. W Bulmer and Co., London, 1799, p 23, Plate VI.Google Scholar
2. Mustard, WT, Chute, AL, Keith, JD, et al. A surgical approach to transposition of the great vessels with extracorporeal circuit. Surgery 1954; 36: 39–51.Google Scholar
3. Jatene, AD, Fontes, VF, Paulista, PP, et al. Successful anatomic correction of transposition of the great vessels: a preliminary report. Arq Bras Cardiol 1975; 28: 461–464.Google ScholarPubMed
4. Fazel, S, Williams, WG, Goldman, BS. Thinned blood, monkey lungs, and the cold heart. J Card Surg 2004; 19: 275–278.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
5. Evans, WN. The arterial switch operation before Jatene. Pediatr Cardiol 2009; 30: 119–124.Google Scholar
6. Bailey, CP, Cookson, BA, Downing, DF, Neptune, WB. Cardiac surgery under hypothermia. J Thorac Surg 1954; 27: 73–91.Google Scholar
7. Kay, EB, Cross, FS. Surgical treatment of transposition of the great vessels. Surgery 1955; 38: 712–716.Google ScholarPubMed
8. Idriss, FS, Goldstein, IR, Grana, L, French, D, Potts, WJ. A new technic for complete correction of transposition of the great vessels. An experimental study with a preliminary clinical report. Circulation 1961; 24: 5–11.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
9. Senning, Å. Surgical correction of transposition of the great vessels. Surgery 1959; 45: 966–980.Google ScholarPubMed
10. Senning, Å. Developments in cardiac surgery in Stockholm during the mid and late 1950s. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1989; 98: 825–832.Google Scholar
11. Bull, C, Yates, R, Sarkar, D, Deanfield, J, de Leval, M. Scientific, ethical, and logistical considerations in introducing a new operation: a retrospective cohort study from paediatric cardiac surgery. BMJ 2000; 320: 1168–1173.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
12. Anagnostopoulos, CE. A proposed new technique for correction of transposition of the great arteries. Ann Thorac Surg 1973; 15: 565–569.Google Scholar
13. Jatene, AD, Fontes, VF, Paulista, PP, et al. Anatomic correction of transposition of the great vessels. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1976; 72: 364–370.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
14. Danielson, GK, Tabry, IF, Mair, DD, Fulton, RE. Great-vessel switch operation without coronary relocation for transposition of great arteries. Mayo Clin Proc 1978; 53: 675–682.Google Scholar
15. Pacifico, AD, Stewart, RW, Bargeron, LM Jr. Repair of transposition of the great arteries with ventricular septal defect by an arterial switch operation. Circulation 1983; 68: II49–II55.Google Scholar
16. Yacoub, M, Radley-Smith, R, Maclaurin, R. Two-stage operation for anatomical correction of TGA-IVS. Lancet 1977; 1: 1275–1278.Google Scholar
17. Jonas, RA, Giglia, TM, Sanders, SP, Wernovsky, G, Castaneda, A. Rapid two stage arterial switch for TGA IVS beyond the neonatal period. Circulation 1989; 80 (Suppl I): 203–208.Google Scholar
18. Boutin, C, Jonas, RA, Sanders, SP, Wernovsky, G, Mone, SM, Colan, SD. Rapid two-stage arterial switch operation. Acquisition of left ventricular mass after pulmonary artery banding in infants with transposition of the great arteries. Circulation 1994; 90: 1304–1309.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
19. Lacour-Gayet, F, Piot, D, Zoghbi, J, et al. Surgical management and indication of left ventricular retraining in arterial switch for transposition of the great arteries with intact ventricular septum. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2001; 20: 824–829.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
20. Nakazawa, M, Oyama, K, Imai, Y, et al. Criteria for two-staged arterial switch operation for simple transposition of great arteries. Circulation 1988; 78: 124–131.Google Scholar
21. Kang, N, de Leval, MR, Elliott, M, et al. Extending the boundaries of the primary arterial switch operation in patients with transposition of the great arteries and intact ventricular septum. Circulation 2004; 110 (Suppl 1): II123–II127.Google Scholar
22. Bisoi, AK, Sharma, P, Chauhan, S, et al. Primary arterial switch operation in children presenting late with d-transposition of great arteries and intact ventricular septum. When is it too late for a primary arterial switch operation? Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2010; 38: 707–713.Google Scholar
23. Liu, YL, Hu, SS, Shen, XD, et al. Safety and efficacy of arterial switch operation in previously inoperable patients. J Card Surg 2010; 25: 400–405.Google Scholar
24. Al Qethamy, HO, Aizaz, K, Aboelnazar, SA, Hijab, S, Al Faraidi, Y. Two-stage arterial switch operation: is late ever too late? Asian Cardiovasc Thorac Ann 2002; 10: 235–239.Google Scholar
25. Turley, K, Mavroudis, C, Ebert, PA. Repair of congenital cardiac lesions during the first week of life. Circulation 1982; 66: I214–I219.Google ScholarPubMed
26. Lecompte, Y, Neveux, JY, Leca, F, et al. Reconstruction of the pulmonary outflow tract without prosthetic conduit. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1982; 84: 727–733.Google Scholar
27. Castaneda, AR, Norwood, WI, Jonas, RA, Colon, SD, Sanders, SP, Lang, P. Transposition of the great arteries and intact ventricular septum: anatomical repair in the neonate. Ann Thorac Surg 1984; 38: 438–443.Google Scholar
28. Mavroudis, C. Anatomic repair of transposition of the great arteries. J Ky Med Assoc 1984; 82: 287–289.Google Scholar
29. Yacoub, MH. The case for anatomic correction of transposition of the great arteries. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1979; 78: 3–6.Google Scholar
30. Castaneda, A. Arterial switch operation for simple and complex TGA – indication criterias and limitations relevant to surgery. Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1991; 39 (Suppl 2): 151–154.Google Scholar
31. Castaneda, AR, Trusler, GA, Paul, MH, Blackstone, EH, Kirklin, JW. The early results of treatment of simple transposition in the current era. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1988; 95: 14–28.Google Scholar
32. Fricke, TA, d'Udekem, Y, Richardson, M, et al. Outcomes of the arterial switch operation for transposition of the great arteries: 25 years of experience. Ann Thorac Surg 2012; 94: 139–145.Google Scholar
33. Lalezari, S, Bruggemans, EF, Blom, NA, Hazekamp, MG. Thirty-year experience with the arterial switch operation. Ann Thorac Surg 2011; 92: 973–979.Google Scholar
34. Rudra, HS, Mavroudis, C, Backer, CL, et al. The arterial switch operation: 25-year experience with 258 patients. Ann Thorac Surg 2011; 92: 1742–1746.Google Scholar
35. Oda, S, Nakano, T, Sugiura, J, Fusazaki, N, Ishikawa, S, Kado, H. Twenty-eight years’ experience of arterial switch operation for transposition of the great arteries in a single institution. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2012; 42: 674–679.Google Scholar
36. Mavroudis, C. Anatomical repair of transposition of the great arteries with intact ventricular septum in the neonate: guidelines to avoid complications. Ann Thorac Surg 1987; 43: 495–501.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
37. Mavroudis, C, Backer, CL, Idriss, FS. Arterial switch for transposition of the great arteries and associated malposition anomalies (Review). Adv Card Surg 1992; 3: 205–247.Google Scholar
38. Dibardino, DJ, Allison, AE, Vaughn, WK, McKenzie, ED, Fraser, CD Jr. Current expectations for newborns undergoing the arterial switch operation. Ann Surg 2004; 239: 588–598.Google Scholar
39. Quaegebeur, JM, Rohmer, J, Ottenkamp, J, et al. The arterial switch operation. An eight-year experience. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1986; 92: 361–384.Google Scholar
40. Williams, WG, McCrindle, BW, Ashburn, DA, Jonas, RA, Mavroudis, C, Blackstone, EH. Congenital Heart Surgeon's Society. Outcomes of 829 neonates with complete transposition of the great arteries 12–17 years after repair. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2003; 24: 1–10.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
41. Kirklin, JW, Colvin, EV, McConnell, ME, Bargeron, LM Jr. Complete transposition of the great arteries: treatment in the current era. Pediatr Clin North Am 1990; 37: 171–177.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
42. Mavroudis, C, Backer, CL. Arterial switch after failed atrial baffle procedures for transposition of the great arteries. Ann Thorac Surg 2000; 69: 851–857.Google Scholar
43. Turina, MI, Siebenmann, R, von Segeser, L, Schönbeck, M, Senning, A. Late functional deterioration after atrial correction for transposition of the great arteries. Circulation 1989; 80: I162–I167.Google ScholarPubMed
44. Mee, RBB. Severe right ventricular failure after Mustard or Senning operation. Two-stage repair: pulmonary artery banding and switch. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1986; 92: 385–390.Google Scholar
45. Poirier, NC, Yu, JH, Brizard, CP, Mee, RB. Long-term results of left ventricular reconditioning and anatomic correction for systemic right ventricular dysfunction after atrial switch procedures. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2004; 127: 975–981.Google Scholar
46. Moulton, AL, de Leval, MR, Macartney, FJ, Taylor, JF, Stark, J. Rastelli procedure for transposition of the great arteries, ventricular septal defect, and left ventricular outflow tract obstruction. Early and late results in 41 patients (1971 to 1978). Br Heart J 1981; 45: 20–28.Google Scholar
47. Uemura, H, Yagihara, T, Kawashima, Y, et al. A bicuspid pulmonary valve is not a contraindication for the arterial switch operation. Ann Thorac Surg 1995; 59: 473–476.Google Scholar
48. Khan, SM, Sallehuddin, AB, Al-Bulbul, ZR, Al-Halees, ZY. Neoaortic bicuspid valve in arterial switch operation: mid-term follow-up. Ann Thorac Surg 2008; 85: 179–184.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
49. Angeli, E, Gerelli, S, Beyler, C, et al. Bicuspid pulmonary valve in transposition of the great arteries: impact on outcome. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2012; 41: 248–255.Google Scholar
50. Sohn, YS, Brizard, CP, Cochrane, AD, Wilkinson, JL, Mas, C, Karl, TR. Arterial switch in hearts with left ventricular outflow and pulmonary valve abnormalities. Ann Thorac Surg 1998; 66: 842–848.Google Scholar
51. Angeli, E, Raisky, O, Bonnet, D, Sidi, D, Vouhé, PR. Late reoperations after neonatal arterial switch operation for transposition of the great arteries. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2008; 34: 32–36.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
52. Vandekerckhove, KD, Blom, NA, Lalezari, S, Koolbergen, DR, Rijlaarsdam, ME, Hazekamp, MG. Long-term follow-up of arterial switch operation with an emphasis on function and dimensions of left ventricle and aorta. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2009; 35: 582–587.Google Scholar
53. Formigari, R, Toscano, A, Giardini, A, et al. Prevalence and predictors of neoaortic regurgitation after arterial switch operation for transposition of the great arteries. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2003; 126: 1753–1759.Google Scholar
54. Losay, J, Touchot, A, Serraf, A, et al. Late outcome after arterial switch operation for transposition of the great arteries. Circulation 2001; 104 (Suppl 1): I121–I126.Google Scholar
55. Marino, BS, Wernovsky, G, McElhinney, DB, et al. Neo-aortic valvar function after the arterial switch. Cardiol Young 2006; 16: 481–489.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
56. Jhang, WK, Shin, HJ, Park, JJ, et al. The importance of neo-aortic root geometry in the arterial switch operation with the trap-door technique in the subsequent development of aortic valve regurgitation. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2012, Jun 21. [Epub ahead of print].Google Scholar
57. Lim, HG, Kim, WH, Lee, JR, Kim, YJ. Long-term results of the arterial switch operation for ventriculo-arterial discordance. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2012, May 9. [Epub ahead of print].Google Scholar
58. Delmo Walter, EM, Huebler, M, Alexi-Meshkishvili, V, Sill, B, Berger, F, Hetzer, R. Fate of the aortic valve following the arterial switch operation. J Card Surg 2010; 25: 730–736.Google Scholar
59. Tobler, D, Williams, WG, Jegatheeswaran, A, et al. Cardiac outcomes in young adult survivors of the arterial switch operation for transposition of the great arteries. J Am Coll Cardiol 2010; 56: 58–64.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
60. Choi, BS, Kwon, BS, Kim, GB, et al. Long-term outcomes after an arterial switch operation for simple complete transposition of the great arteries. Korean Circ J 2010; 40: 23–30.Google Scholar
61. Lange, R, Cleuziou, J, Hörer, J, et al. Risk factors for aortic insufficiency and aortic valve replacement after the arterial switch operation. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2008; 34: 711–717.Google Scholar
62. Pan, X, Hu, S, Li, S, et al. Predictors for late insufficiency of the neo-aortic valve after the switch procedure. J Heart Valve Dis 2010; 19: 731–735.Google Scholar
63. Ou, P, Khraiche, D, Celermajer, DS, et al. Mechanisms of coronary complications after the arterial switch for transposition of the great arteries. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2012, Jul 11. [Epub ahead of print] .Google Scholar
64. El-Segaier, M, Lundin, A, Hochbergs, P, Jögi, P, Pesonen, E. Late coronary complications after arterial switch operation and their treatment. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 2010; 76: 1027–1032.Google Scholar
65. Angeli, E, Formigari, R, Pace Napoleone, C, et al. Long-term coronary artery outcome after arterial switch operation for transposition of the great arteries. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2010; 38: 714–720.Google Scholar
66. Bonnet, D, Bonhoeffer, P, Piéchaud, JF, et al. Long-term fate of the coronary arteries after the arterial switch operation in newborns with transposition of the great arteries. Heart 1996; 76: 274–279.Google Scholar
67. Vargo, P, Mavroudis, C, Stewart, RD, Backer, CL. Late complications following the arterial switch operation. Collective Review. World J Pediatr Cong Heart Surg 2011; 2: 37–42.Google Scholar
68. Mavroudis, C, Stewart, RD, Backer, CL, Rudra, H, Vargo, P, Jacobs, ML. Reoperative techniques for complications after arterial switch. Ann Thorac Surg 2011; 92: 1747–1754.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
69. Pasquali, SK, Marino, BS, McBride, MG, Wernovsky, G, Paridon, SM. Coronary artery pattern and age impact exercise performance late after the arterial switch operation. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2007; 134: 1207–1212.Google Scholar
70. Raisky, O, Bergoend, E, Agnoletti, G, et al. Late coronary artery lesions after neonatal arterial switch operation: results of surgical coronary revascularization. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2007; 31: 894–898.Google Scholar
71. Agnoletti, G, Bajolle, F, Bonnet, D, Sidi, D, Vouhé, P. Late coronary complications after arterial switch operation for transposition of great arteries. Clinical and therapeutic implications. Images Paediatr Cardiol 2005; 7: 1–11.Google Scholar
72. Hausdorf, G, Kampmann, C, Schneider, M. Coronary angioplasty for coronary stenosis after the arterial switch procedure. Am J Cardiol 1995; 76: 621–623.Google Scholar
73. Weindling, SN, Wernovsky, G, Colan, SD, et al. Myocardial perfusion, function and exercise tolerance after the arterial switch operation. J Am Coll Cardiol 1994; 23: 424–433.Google Scholar
74. Sterrett, LE, Schamberger, MS, Ebenroth, ES, Siddiqui, AR, Hurwitz, RA. Myocardial perfusion and exercise capacity 12 years after arterial switch surgery for D-transposition of the great arteries. Pediatr Cardiol 2011; 32: 785–791.Google Scholar
75. van Beek, E, Binkhorst, M, de Hoog, M, et al. Exercise performance and activity level in children with transposition of the great arteries treated by the arterial switch operation. Am J Cardiol 2010; 105: 398–403.Google Scholar
76. Hui, L, Chau, AK, Leung, MP, Chiu, CS, Cheung, YF. Assessment of left ventricular function long term after arterial switch operation for transposition of the great arteries by dobutamine stress echocardiography. Heart 2005; 91: 68–72.Google Scholar
77. Müller, J, Hess, J, Hörer, J, Hager, A. Persistent superior exercise performance and quality of life long-term after arterial switch operation compared to that after atrial redirection. Int J Cardiol 2011, Nov 18. [Epub ahead of print].Google Scholar
78. Yamazaki, A, Yamamoto, N, Sakamoto, T, et al. Long-term outcomes and social independence level after arterial switch operation. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2008; 33: 239–243.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
79. Culbert, EL, Ashburn, DA, Cullen-Dean, G, et al. Quality of life of children after repair of transposition of the great arteries. Circulation 2003; 108: 857–862.Google Scholar
80. de Koning, WB, van Osch-Gevers, M, Ten Harkel, AD, et al. Follow-up outcomes 10 years after arterial switch operation for transposition of the great arteries: comparison of cardiological health status and health-related quality of life to those of the a normal reference population. Eur J Pediatr 2008; 167: 995–1004.Google Scholar
81. Bellinger, DC, Wypij, D, Rivkin, MJ, et al. Adolescents with d-transposition of the great arteries corrected with the arterial switch procedure: neuropsychological assessment and structural brain imaging. Circulation 2011; 124: 1361–1369.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed