Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jkksz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-28T15:22:47.300Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Monitoring the health of the work environment with a daily assessment tool: the REAL – Relative Environment Assessment Lens – indicator

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 October 2015

Karen E. Hinsley*
Affiliation:
Cardiovascular and Critical Care Services, Department of Nursing Patient Services, Boston Children’s Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, United States America
Audrey C. Marshall
Affiliation:
Department of Cardiology, Boston Children’s Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, United States of America Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, United States of America
Michelle H. Hurtig
Affiliation:
Cardiovascular and Critical Care Services, Department of Nursing Patient Services, Boston Children’s Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, United States America
Jason M. Thornton
Affiliation:
Cardiovascular and Critical Care Services, Department of Nursing Patient Services, Boston Children’s Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, United States America
Cheryl A. O’Connell
Affiliation:
Cardiovascular and Critical Care Services, Department of Nursing Patient Services, Boston Children’s Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, United States America
Courtney L. Porter
Affiliation:
Cardiovascular and Critical Care Services, Department of Nursing Patient Services, Boston Children’s Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, United States America
Jean A. Connor
Affiliation:
Cardiovascular and Critical Care Services, Department of Nursing Patient Services, Boston Children’s Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, United States America Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, United States of America
Patricia A. Hickey
Affiliation:
Cardiovascular and Critical Care Services, Department of Nursing Patient Services, Boston Children’s Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, United States America Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, United States of America
*
Correspondence to: K. E. Hinsley, BSN, RN, CCRN, Cardiovascular and Critical Care Services, Department of Nursing Patient Services, Boston Children’s Hospital, 300 Longwood Ave, Boston, MA 02115, United States of America. Tel: 617-355-7046; Fax: 617-739-5022; E-mail: [email protected]

Abstract

Background

Evidence shows that the health of the work environment impacts staff satisfaction, interdisciplinary communication, and patient outcomes. Utilising the American Association of Critical-Care Nurses’ Healthy Work Environment standards, we developed a daily assessment tool.

Methods

The Relative Environment Assessment Lens (REAL) Indicator was developed using a consensus-based method to evaluate the health of the work environment and to identify opportunities for improvement from the front-line staff. A visual scale using images that resemble emoticons was linked with a written description of feelings about their work environment that day, with the highest number corresponding to the most positive experience. Face validity was established by seeking staff feedback and goals were set.

Results

Over 10 months, results from the REAL Indicator in the cardiac catheterisation laboratory indicated an overall good work environment. The goal of 80% of the respondents reporting their work environment to be “Great”, “Good”, or “Satisfactory” was met each month. During the same time frame, this goal was met four times in the cardiovascular operating room. On average, 72.7% of cardiovascular operating room respondents reported their work environment to be “Satisfactory” or better.

Conclusion

The REAL Indicator has become a valuable tool in assessing the specific issues of the clinical area and identifying opportunities for improvement. Given the feasibility of and positive response to this tool in the cardiac catheterisation laboratory, it has been adopted in other patient-care areas where staff and leaders believe that they need to understand the health of the environment in a more specific and frequent time frame.

Type
Original Articles
Copyright
© Cambridge University Press 2015 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. McCauley, K, Irwin, RS. Changing the work environment in the intensive care units to achieve patient-focused care: the time has come. Am J Crit Care 2006; 15: 541548.Google Scholar
2. American Association of Critical-Care Nurses. AACN Standards for Establishing and Sustaining Healthy Work Environments: A Journey to Excellence, 2005. Retrieved 25 June 2014 from http://aacn.org/WD/HWE/Docs/ExecSum.pdf Google Scholar
3. Institute of Medicine (IOM). Crossing the quality chasm: a new health system for the 21st century. National Academy Press, Washington, DC, 2001.Google Scholar
4. Lencioni, P. The advantage: why organizational health trumps everything else in business. Jossey-Bass, San Francisco, 2012.Google Scholar
5. Lewis, PS, Malecha, A. The impact of workplace incivility on the work environment, manager skill, and productivity. J Nurs Adm 2011; 41: 4147.Google Scholar
6. The Joint Commission. Accreditation, Health Care, Certification, (n.d.). Retrieved 25 June 2014 from http://www.jointcommission.org Google Scholar
7. Gutkind, L. Silence kills: speaking out and saving lives. Southern Methodist University Press, Dallas, 2007.Google Scholar
8. Aiken, LH, Clarke, SP, Sloane, DM, Sochalski, J, Silber, JH. Hospital nurse staffing and patient mortality, nurse burnout, and job dissatisfaction. JAMA 2002; 288: 19871993.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
9. Aiken, LH, Clarke, SP, Sloane, DM. Hospital staffing, organizational support and quality of care: cross-national findings. Int J Qual Health Care 2002; 14: 513.Google Scholar
10. Hickey, PA. Building a culture of excellence in Boston and Beyond. WJPCHS 2010; 1: 314320.Google Scholar
11. Hammond, SA. The thin book of appreciative inquiry, 3rd edn. Thin Book Publishing Co, Bend, OR, 2013.Google Scholar