Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jn8rn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-30T23:17:22.989Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Is interventional closure the current treatment of choice for selected patients with deficient atrial septation?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 February 2006

Per G. Bjørnstad
Per G. Bjørnstad
Affiliation:
Paediatric Cardiology, Rikshospitalet – The National Hospital, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'

Keywords

DevicesCardioSEALSTARflexAmplatzerHelexcardiac surgerytreatmentcomplications
Type
Review
Information
Cardiology in the Young , Volume 16 , Issue 1 , January 2006 , pp. 3 - 10
Copyright
© 2006 Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

King TD, Mills NL. Nonoperative closure of atrial septal defects. Surgery 1974; 75: 383–388.Google Scholar
Rashkind WJ. Experimental transvenous closure of atrial and ventricular septal defects. Circulation 1975; 52: II8.Google Scholar
Rashkind WJ. Transcatheter closure of atrial septal defects in children. Eur J Cardiol 1977; 8: 119–120.Google Scholar
Lock JE, Rome JJ, Davis R, et al. Transcatheter closure of atrial septal defects. Experimental studies. Circulation 1989; 79: 1091–1099.Google Scholar
Rome JJ, Keane JF, Perry SB, Spevak PJ, Lock JE. Double-umbrella closure of atrial defects. Initial clinical applications. [see comment]. Circulation 1990; 82: 751–758.Google Scholar
Sideris EB, Sideris SE, Thanopoulos BD, Ehly RL, Fowlkes JP. Transvenous atrial septal defect occlusion by the buttoned device. Am J Cardiol 1990; 66: 1524–1526.Google Scholar
Sideris EB, Sideris SE, Fowlkes JP, Ehly RL, Smith JE, Gulde RE. Transvenous atrial septal defect occlusion in piglets with a “buttoned” double-disk device. Circulation 1990; 81: 312–318.Google Scholar
Babic UU, Grujicic S, Djurisic Z, Vucinic M. Transcatheter closure of atrial septal defects. Lancet 1990; 336: 566–567.Google Scholar
Das GS, Voss G, Jarvis G, Wyche K, Gunther R, Wilson RF. Experimental atrial septal defect closure with a new, transcatheter, self-centering device. Circulation 1993; 88: 1754–1764.Google Scholar
Rickers C, Hamm C, Stern H, et al. Percutaneous closure of secundum atrial septal defect with a new self centering device (“angel wings”). Heart 1998; 80: 517–521.Google Scholar
Agarwal SK, Ghosh PK, Mittal PK. Failure of devices used for closure of atrial septal defects: mechanisms and management. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1996; 112: 21–26.Google Scholar
Kay JD, O'Laughlin MP, Ito K, Wang A, Bashore TM, Harrison JK. Five-year clinical and echocardiographic evaluation of the Das AngelWings atrial septal occluder. Am Heart J 2004; 147: 361–368.Google Scholar
Carminati M, Giusti S, Hausdorf G, et al. A European multicentric experience using the CardioSEAL and Starflex double umbrella devices to close interatrial communications holes within the oval fossa. Cardiol Young 2000; 10: 519–526.Google Scholar
Bjørnstad PG, Smevik B, Fiane A, Tønnessen TI, Fosse E. Catheter-based closure of atrial septal defects with a newly developed nitinol double disc: an experimental study. Cardiol Young 1997; 7: 220–224.Google Scholar
Sharafuddin MJ, Gu X, Titus JL, Urness M, Cervera-Ceballos JJ, Amplatz K. Transvenous closure of secundum atrial septal defects: preliminary results with a new self-expanding nitinol prosthesis in a swine model. [erratum appears in Circulation 1998 Feb 3; 97: 413]. Circulation 1997; 95: 2162–2168.Google Scholar
Bjørnstad PG, Masura J, Thaulow E, et al. Interventional closure of atrial septal defects with the Amplatzer device: first clinical experience. Cardiol Young 1997; 7: 277–283.Google Scholar
Masura J, Gavora P, Formanek A, Hijazi ZM. Transcatheter closure of secundum atrial septal defects using the new self-centering Amplatzer septal occluder: initial human experience. Cathet Cardiovasc Diagn 1997; 42: 388–393.Google Scholar
Berger F, Ewert P, Bjornstad PG, et al. Transcatheter closure as standard treatment for most interatrial defects: experience in 200 patients treated with the Amplatzer Septal Occluder [see comments]. Cardiol Young 1999; 9: 468–473.Google Scholar
Ewert P, Daehnert I, Berger F, et al. Transcatheter closure of atrial septal defects under echocardiographic guidance without X-ray: initial experiences. Cardiol Young 1999; 9: 136–140.Google Scholar
Kreutzer J, Ryan CA, Wright Jr JA, et al. Acute animal studies of the STARFlex system: a new self-centering cardioSEAL septal occluder. Cathet Cardiovasc Interv 2000; 49: 225–233.Google Scholar
Carminati M, Chessa M, Butera G, et al. Transcatheter closure of atrial septal defects with the STARFlex device: early results and follow-up. J Intervent Cardiol 2001; 14: 319–324.Google Scholar
Hausdorf G, Kaulitz R, Paul T, Carminati M, Lock J. Transcatheter closure of atrial septal defect with a new flexible, self-centering device (the STARFlex Occluder). Am J Cardiol 1999; 84: 1113–1116, A10.Google Scholar
Zahn EM, Wilson N, Cutright W, Latson LA. Development and testing of the Helex septal occluder, a new expanded polytetrafluoroethylene atrial septal defect occlusion system. Circulation 2001; 104: 711–716.Google Scholar
Söderberg B, Solymar L, Larsson M, Thommen D, Bernhard J, Östman-Smith I. The Solysafe septal occluder for atrial septal defects – animal testing of the improved design. Cardiol Young 2005; 15 (Suppl 2): II79.Google Scholar
Sideris EB, Sideris CE, Toumanides S, Moulopoulos SD. From disk devices to transcatheter patches: the evolution of wireless heart defect occlusion. J Intervent Cardiol 2001; 14: 211–214.Google Scholar
Sideris EB, Toumanides S, Macuil B, et al. Transcatheter patch correction of secundum atrial septal defects. Am J Cardiol 2002; 89: 1082–1086.Google Scholar
Wilkinson JL, Goh TH. Early clinical experience with use of the ‘Amplatzer Septal Occluder’ device for atrial septal defect. Cardiol Young 1998; 8: 295–302.Google Scholar
Pedra CA, Pihkala J, Lee KJ, et al. Transcatheter closure of atrial septal defects using the Cardio-Seal implant. Heart 2000; 84: 320–326.Google Scholar
Wang JK, Tsai SK, Wu MH, Lin MT, Lue HC. Short- and intermediate-term results of transcatheter closure of atrial septal defect with the Amplatzer Septal Occluder. Am Heart J 2004; 148: 511–517.Google Scholar
Fischer G, Stieh J, Uebing A, Hoffmann U, Morf G, Kramer HH. Experience with transcatheter closure of secundum atrial septal defects using the Amplatzer septal occluder: a single centre study in 236 consecutive patients. Heart 2003; 89: 199–204.Google Scholar
Rastegari M, Redington AN, Sullivan ID. Influence of the introduction of Amplatzer device on the interventional closure of defects within the oval fossa in children. Cardiol Young 2001; 11: 521–525.Google Scholar
Vogel M, Berger F, Dahnert I, Ewert P, Lange PE. Treatment of atrial septal defects in symptomatic children aged less than 2 years of age using the Amplatzer septal occluder. Cardiol Young 2000; 10: 534–537.Google Scholar
Bjørnstad PG, Holmstrøm H, Smevik B, Tønnessen TI, Fosse E. Transcatheter closure of atrial septal defects in the oval fossa. Is the method applicable in small children? Cardiol Young 2002; 12: 352–356.Google Scholar
Amin Z, Hijazi ZM, Bass JL, Cheatham JP, Hellenbrand WE, Kleinman CS. Erosion of Amplatzer septal occluder device after closure of secundum atrial septal defects. Cathet Cardiovasc Interv 2004; 63: 496–502.Google Scholar
Kaulitz R, Paul T, Hausdorf G. Extending the limits of transcatheter closure of atrial septal defects with the double umbrella device (CardioSEAL). Heart 1998; 80: 54–59.Google Scholar
Hwang B, Lee PC, Fu YC, et al. Transcatheter closure of atrial septal defect with a CardioSEAL device. Jpn Heart J 2000; 41: 471–480.Google Scholar
Butera G, Carminati M, Chessa M, et al. CardioSEAL/STARflex versus Amplatzer devices for percutaneous closure of small to moderate (up to 18 mm) atrial septal defects. Am Heart J 2004; 148: 507–510.Google Scholar
Vincent RN, Raviele AA, Diehl HJ. Single-center experience with the HELEX septal occluder for closure of atrial septal defects in children. J Interv Cardiol 2003; 16: 79–82.Google Scholar
Pedra CA, Pedra SF, Esteves CA, et al. Initial experience in Brazil with the Helex septal occluder for percutaneous occlusion of atrial septal defects. Arq Brasil Cardiol 2003; 81: 435–452.Google Scholar
Hughes ML, Maskell G, Goh TH, Wilkinson JL. Prospective comparison of costs and short term health outcomes of surgical versus device closure of atrial septal defect in children. Heart 2002; 88: 67–70.Google Scholar
Du ZD, Hijazi ZM, Kleinman CS, Silverman NH, Larntz K, Amplatzer I. Comparison between transcatheter and surgical closure of secundum atrial septal defect in children and adults: results of a multicenter nonrandomized trial. J Am Coll Cardiol 2002; 39: 1836–1844.Google Scholar
Miyaji K, Murakami A, Kobayashi J, Suematsu Y, Takamoto S. Transxiphoid approach for intracardiac repair using video-assisted cardioscopy. Ann Thorac Surg 2001; 71: 1716–1718.Google Scholar
Dabritz S, Sachweh J, Walter M, Messmer BJ. Closure of atrial septal defects via limited right anterolateral thoracotomy as a minimal invasive approach in female patients [see comment]. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 1999; 15: 18–23.Google Scholar
Cremer JT, Boning A, Anssar MB, et al. Different approaches for minimally invasive closure of atrial septal defects [see comment]. Ann Thorac Surg 1999; 67: 1648–1652.Google Scholar
Black MD, Freedom RM. Minimally invasive repair of atrial septal defects. Ann Thorac Surg 1998; 65: 765–767.Google Scholar
Baskett RJ, Tancock E, Ross DB. The gold standard for atrial septal defect closure: current surgical results, with an emphasis on morbidity. Pediatr Cardiol 2003; 24: 444–447.Google Scholar
Hopkins RA, Bert AA, Buchholz B, Guarino K, Meyers M. Surgical patch closure of atrial septal defects. Ann Thorac Surg 2004; 77: 2144–2149.Google Scholar
Maeno YV, Benson LN, Boutin C. Impact of dynamic 3D transoesophageal echocardiography in the assessment of atrial septal defects and occlusion by the double-umbrella device (CardioSEAL). Cardiol Young 1998; 8: 368–378.Google Scholar
Prieto LR, Foreman CK, Cheatham JP, Latson LA. Intermediate-term outcome of transcatheter secundum atrial septal defect closure using the Bard Clamshell Septal Umbrella. Am J Cardiol 1996; 78: 1310–1312.Google Scholar
Hausdorf G, Schneider M, Fink C, et al. Transcatheter closure of atrial septal defects within the oval fossa: medium-term results in children using the ‘ASDOS’-technique. Cardiol Young 1998; 8: 462–471.Google Scholar
Sievert H, Babic UU, Hausdorf G, et al. Transcatheter closure of atrial septal defect and patent foramen ovale with ASDOS device (a multi-institutional European trial). Am J Cardiol 1998; 82: 1405–1413.Google Scholar
Kong H, Wilkinson JL, Coe JY, et al. Corrosive behaviour of Amplatzer devices in experimental and biological environments. Cardiol Young 2002; 12: 260–265.Google Scholar
Ries MW, Kampmann C, Rupprecht HJ, Hintereder G, Hafner G, Meyer J. Nickel release after implantation of the Amplatzer occluder. Am Heart J 2003; 145: 737–741.Google Scholar
Pinto FF, Sousa L, Fragata J. Late cardiac tamponade after transcatheter closure of atrial septal defect with Cardioseal device. Cardiol Young 2001; 11: 233–235.Google Scholar
Preventza O, Sampath-Kumar S, Wasnick J, Gold JP. Late cardiac perforation following transcatheter atrial septal defect closure. Ann Thorac Surg 2004; 77: 1435–1437.Google Scholar
Mills NL, King TD. Late follow-up of nonoperative closure of secundum atrial septal defects using the King-Mills double-umbrella device. Am J Cardiol 2003; 92: 353–355.Google Scholar
Krumsdorf U, Ostermayer S, Billinger K, et al. Incidence and clinical course of thrombus formation on atrial septal defect and patent foramen ovale closure devices in 1000 consecutive patients. J Am Coll Cardiol 2004; 43: 302–309.Google Scholar
Divekar A, Gaamangwe T, Shaikh N, Raabe M, Ducas J. Cardiac perforation after device closure of atrial septal defects with the Amplatzer septal occluder. J Am Coll Cardiol 2005; 45: 1213–1218.Google Scholar
Berger F, Vogel M, Alexi-Meskishvili V, Lange PE. Comparison of results and complications of surgical and Amplatzer device closure of atrial septal defects. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1999; 118: 674–678.Google Scholar
Bialkowski J, Karwot B, Szkutnik M, Banaszak P, Kusa J, Skalski J. Closure of atrial septal defects in children: surgery versus Amplatzer device implantation. Tex Heart Inst J 2004; 31: 220–223.Google Scholar
Peuster M, Wohlsein P, Brugmann M, et al. A novel approach to temporary stenting: degradable cardiovascular stents produced from corrodible metal-results 6–18 months after implantation into New Zealand white rabbits. Heart 2001; 86: 563–569.Google Scholar
Jux C, Bertram H, Wohlsein P, et al. Experimental ASD closure using autologous cell-seeded interventional closure devices. Cardiovasc Res 2002; 53: 181–191.Google Scholar
Jux C, Wohlsein P, Bruegmann M, Zutz M, Franzbach B, Bertram H. New biological matrix for septal occlusion. J Interv Cardiol 2003; 16: 149–152.Google Scholar