Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gvvz8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-29T03:29:33.107Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The importance of small for gestational age in the risk assessment of infants with critical congenital heart disease

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 January 2014

Anthony A. Sochet ,
Mark Ayers ,
Emilio Quezada ,
Katherine Braley ,
Jennifer Leshko ,
Ernest K. Amankwah ,
James A. Quintessenza ,
Jeffrey P. Jacobs  and
Gul Dadlani
Anthony A. Sochet
Affiliation:
Department of Pediatrics, University of South Florida Morsani College of Medicine, Tampa, United States of America
Mark Ayers
Affiliation:
Department of Pediatrics, University of South Florida Morsani College of Medicine, Tampa, United States of America
Emilio Quezada
Affiliation:
Department of Pediatrics, University of South Florida Morsani College of Medicine, Tampa, United States of America
Katherine Braley
Affiliation:
Department of Pediatrics, University of South Florida Morsani College of Medicine, Tampa, United States of America
Jennifer Leshko
Affiliation:
Clinical and Translational Research Office, Johns Hopkins All Children's Hospital, Florida, United States of America
Ernest K. Amankwah
Affiliation:
Clinical and Translational Research Office, Johns Hopkins All Children's Hospital, Florida, United States of America
James A. Quintessenza
Affiliation:
Johns Hopkins All Childrens Heart Institute, All Children's Hospital, St Petersburg, Florida, United States of America
Jeffrey P. Jacobs
Affiliation:
Johns Hopkins All Childrens Heart Institute, All Children's Hospital, St Petersburg, Florida, United States of America
Gul Dadlani*
Affiliation:
Department of Pediatrics, University of South Florida Morsani College of Medicine, Tampa, United States of America Johns Hopkins All Childrens Heart Institute, All Children's Hospital, St Petersburg, Florida, United States of America
*
Correspondence to: Dr G. Dadlani, MD, Johns Hopkins All Children's Heart Institute, 2nd Floor Outpatient Care Center #206, 601 5th Street South, Saint Petersburg, FL 33701, United States of America. Tel: 727-767-3333; Fax: 727-767-8990; E-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Background

Infants with critical congenital heart disease who require cardiothoracic surgical intervention may have significant post-operative mortality and morbidity. Infants who are small for gestational age <10th percentile with foetal growth restriction may have end-organ dysfunction that may predispose them to increased morbidity or mortality.

Methods

A single-institution retrospective review was performed in 230 infants with congenital heart disease who had cardiothoracic surgical intervention <60 days of age. Pre-, peri-, and post-operative morbidity and mortality markers were collected along with demographics and anthropometric measurements.

Results

There were 230 infants, 57 (23.3%) small for gestational age and 173 (70.6%) appropriate for gestational age. No significant difference was noted in pre-operative markers – gestational age, age at surgery, corrected gestational age, Society for Thoracic Surgeons and European Association for Cardiothoracic Surgery mortality score; or post-operative factors – length of stay, ventilation days, arrhythmias, need for extracorporeal membrane oxygenation, vocal cord dysfunction, hearing loss; or end-organ dysfunction – gastro-intestinal, renal, central nervous system, or genetic. Small for gestational age infants were more likely to have failed vision tests (p = 0.006). Small for gestational age infants were more likely to have increased 30-day (p = 0.005) and discharge mortality (p = 0.035). Small for gestational age infants with normal birth weight (>2500 g) were also at increased risk of 30-day mortality compared with appropriate for gestational age infants (p = 0.045).

Conclusions

Small for gestational age infants with congenital heart disease who undergo cardiothoracic surgery <60 days of age have increased risk of mortality and failed vision screening. Assessment of foetal growth restriction as part of routine pre-operative screening may be beneficial.

Keywords

Small for gestational agecritical congenital heart diseasemortalitymorbidityoutcomefoetal growth restrictionSociety for Thoracic Surgeons and European Association for Cardiothoracic Surgery congenital heart surgery mortality scorelow birth weight
Type
Original Article
Information
Cardiology in the Young , Volume 23 , Issue 6: HeartWeek 2013 , December 2013 , pp. 896 - 904
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2013 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1.van der Linde, D, Konings, EE, Slager, MA, Witsenburg, M, Helbing, WA, Takkenberg, JJ, Roos-Hesselink, JW. Birth prevalence of congenital heart disease worldwide: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Am Coll Cardiol 2011; 58: 2241–2247.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
2.Curzon, CL, Milford-Beland, S, Li, JS, et al. Cardiac surgery in infants with low birth weight is associated with increased mortality: analysis of the Society of Thoracic Surgeons Congenital Heart Disease. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2008; 135: 546–551.Google Scholar
3.Ades, AM, Dominguez, TE, Nicolson, SC, Gaynor, JW, Spray, TL, Wernovsky, G, Tabbutt, S. Morbidity and mortality after surgery for congenital heart disease in the infant born low weight. Cardiol Young 2010: 8–17.Google Scholar
4.Fenton, TR. A new growth chart for preterm babies: Babson and Benda's chart updated with recent data and a new format. BMC Pediatr 2003; 3: 13.Google Scholar
5.O'Brien, SM, Clarke, DR, Jacobs, JP, et al. An empirically based tool for analyzing mortality associated with congenital heart surgery. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2009; 138: 1139–1153.Google Scholar
6.Boo, HA, Harding, JE. The developmental origins of adult disease (Barker) hypothesis. Aust NZ J Obstet Gynaecol 2006; 46: 4–14.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
7.Barker, DJ, Bull, AR, Osmond, C, Simmonds, SJ. Foetal and placental size and risk of hypertension in adult life. Br Med J 1990; 301: 259–262.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
8.Barker, DJ, Hales, CN, Fall, CH, Osmond, C, Phipps, K, Clark, PM. Type 2 (non-insulin-dependent) diabetes mellitus, hypertension and hyperlipidaemia (syndrome X): relation to reduced fetal growth. Diabetologia 1993; 36: 62–67.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
9.Newsome, CA, Shiell, AW, Fall, CH, Phillips, DI, Shier, R, Law, CM. Is birth weight related to later glucose and insulin metabolism? – A systematic review. Diabet Med 2003; 20: 339–348.Google Scholar
10.Lal, MK, Manktelow, BN, Draper, ES, Field, DJ. Chronic lung disease of prematurity and intrauterine growth retardation: a population-based study. Pediatrics 2003; 111: 483–487.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
11.Hack, M, Youngstrom, EA, Cartar, L, et al. Behavioral outcomes and evidence of psychopathology among very low birth weight infants at age 20 years. Pediatrics 2004; 114: 932–940.Google Scholar
12.Lundgren, EM, Tuvemo, T. Effects of being born small for gestational age on long-term intellectual performance. Best Pract Res Clin Endocrinol Metab 2008; 22: 477–488.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
13.Berle, JØ, Mykletun, A, Daltveit, AK, Rasmussen, S, Dahl, AA. Outcomes in adulthood for children with foetal growth retardation. A linkage study from the Nord-Trøndelag Health Study (HUNT) and the Medical Birth Registry of Norway. Acta Psychiatr Scand 2006; 113: 501–509.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
14.Reddy, VM, McElhinney, DB, Sagrado, T, Parry, AJ, Teitel, DF, Hanley, FL. Results of 102 cases of complete repair of congenital heart defects in patients weighing 700 to 2500 g. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1999; 117: 324–331.Google Scholar
15.Ades, A, Johnson, BA, Berger, S. Management of low birth weight infants with congenital heart disease. Clin Perinatol 2005; 32: 999–1015; x-xi.Google Scholar
16.Pinello, L, Manea, S, Visonà Dalla Pozza, L, Mazzarolo, M, Facchin, P. Visual, motor and psychomotor development in small-for-gestational-age preterm infants. J AAPOS 2013; 17: 352–356.Google Scholar