Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7czq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-27T21:42:03.524Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Impact of prenatal diagnosis on the management and early outcome of critical duct-dependent cardiac lesions

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  07 February 2018

Varsha Thakur*
Affiliation:
Department of Paediatrics, Labatt Family Heart Centre, The Hospital for Sick Children, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
Nathalie Dutil
Affiliation:
Department of Paediatrics, Labatt Family Heart Centre, The Hospital for Sick Children, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
Steven M. Schwartz
Affiliation:
Department of Paediatrics, Labatt Family Heart Centre, The Hospital for Sick Children, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
Edgar Jaeggi
Affiliation:
Department of Paediatrics, Labatt Family Heart Centre, The Hospital for Sick Children, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
*
Correspondence to: V. Thakur, MD, FRCPC, The Hospital for Sick Children, 555 University Avenue Toronto, Ontario, Canada, M5G 1X8. Tel: +416 813 7466; Fax: +416 813 7547; E-mail: [email protected]

Abstract

Objective

The objective of this study was to compare the preoperative management and outcome of neonates with duct-dependent critical CHD with fetal versus postnatal diagnosis.

Methods

Patients referred with CHD to our centre from January 1, 2009 to December 31, 2010 were enrolled prospectively. Live births with a critical form of CHD, a gestational age ⩾36 weeks and a weight ⩾2 kg at birth, and the intention-to-treat were included in this sub-study. Excluded were neonates with lethal non-cardiac and/or genetic anomalies.

Results

In total, 129, 63 fetal and 66 postnatal, cases met the study inclusion criteria. All had received appropriate antenatal care, including a routine fetal anatomy scan. Both cohorts were comparable in weight, gestational age, and APGAR scores at birth. Unlike the postnatal cases, there were no deaths (0/63 versus 5/66; p=0.06) and no cardiac arrests (0/63 versus 9/63; p=0.003) before surgery or catheter intervention in those cases with a prenatal diagnosis of critical CHD. Moreover, newborns with fetal diagnoses were admitted earlier (median 0 (range 0–3) versus 2 (0–25) days; p<0.001) and were less likely to require preoperative ventilation (19/63 versus 31/61, p=0.03) and vasoactive medication (4/63 versus 15/61, p=0.006) than the postnatal cases.

Conclusions

Prenatal diagnosis of critical CHD in this study was associated with significantly shorter time intervals from birth to neonatal admission and the absence of life-threatening or fatal preoperative cardiac events. Increased efforts should be made to improve rates of prenatal diagnosis.

Type
Original Articles
Copyright
© Cambridge University Press 2018 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology. Cardiac screening examination of the fetus: guidelines for performing the ‘basic’ and ‘extended basic’ cardiac scan. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2006; 27: 107113.Google Scholar
2. Tworetzky, W, McElhinney, DB, Reddy, VM, Brook, MM, Hanley, FL, Silverman, NH. Improved surgical outcome after fetal diagnosis of hypoplastic left heart syndrome. Circulation 2001; 103: 12691273.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
3. Sivarajan, V, Penny, DJ, Filan, P, Brizard, C, Shekerdemian, LS. Impact of antenatal diagnosis of hypoplastic left heart syndrome on the clinical presentation and surgical outcomes: the Australian experience. J Paediatr Child Health 2009; 45: 112117.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
4. Bonnet, D, Coltri, A, Butera, G, et al. Detection of transposition of the great arteries in fetuses reduces neonatal morbidity and mortality. Circulation 1999; 99: 916918.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
5. Blyth, M, Howe, D, Gnanapragasam, J, Wellesley, D. The hidden mortality of transposition of the great arteries and survival advantage provided by prenatal diagnosis. BJOG Int J Obstet Gynaecol 2008; 115: 10961100.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
6. Tzifa, A, Barker, C, Tibby, SM, Simpson, JM. Prenatal diagnosis of pulmonary atresia: impact on clinical presentation and early outcome. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed 2007; 92: F199F203.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
7. Raboisson, MJ, Samson, C, Ducreux, C, et al. Impact of prenatal diagnosis of transposition of the great arteries on obstetric and early postnatal management. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2009; 142: 1822.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
8. Levey, A, Glickstein, JS, Kleinman, CS, et al. The impact of prenatal diagnosis of complex congenital heart disease on neonatal outcomes. Pediatr Cardiol 31: 587597.Google Scholar