Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-mkpzs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-18T10:34:58.609Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The impact of actual and perceived disease severity on pre-operative psychological well-being and illness behaviour in adult congenital heart disease patients

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 March 2013

Edward Callus ,
Elisabeth M. W. J. Utens ,
Emilia Quadri ,
Cristian Ricci ,
Mario Carminati ,
Alessandro Giamberti  and
Massimo Chessa
Edward Callus*
Affiliation:
Department of Pediatric Cardiology and Adult with Congenital Heart Defect, IRCCS Policlinico San Donato, Milan, Italy
Elisabeth M. W. J. Utens
Affiliation:
Department of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry/Psychology, Erasmus Medical Centre, Sophia Children's Hospital, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
Emilia Quadri
Affiliation:
Department of Pediatric Cardiology and Adult with Congenital Heart Defect, IRCCS Policlinico San Donato, Milan, Italy
Cristian Ricci
Affiliation:
Fondazione Don C.Gnocchi, Piazzale Morandi, Milan, Italy
Mario Carminati
Affiliation:
Department of Pediatric Cardiology and Adult with Congenital Heart Defect, IRCCS Policlinico San Donato, Milan, Italy
Alessandro Giamberti
Affiliation:
Department of Pediatric Cardiac Surgery, IRCCS Policlinico San Donato, Milan, Italy
Massimo Chessa
Affiliation:
Department of Pediatric Cardiology and Adult with Congenital Heart Defect, IRCCS Policlinico San Donato, Milan, Italy
*
Correspondence to: Dr E. Callus, Department of Pediatric Cardiology and Adult with Congenital Heart Defect, IRCCS Policlinico San Donato, Via Morandi, 30, 20097 San Donato M.se, Milan, Italy. Tel: +3902527744707; Fax: +390252774912; E-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Objectives: The purpose of this study was to investigate whether the objective medical parameters related to congenital heart disease and patients’ ratings of cardiac disease severity were related to psychological well-being and illness behaviour during the pre-operative period. Methods: A total of 143 patients (63 male patients; 16–73 years old) with congenital heart disease evaluated the severity of their cardiac condition using a numerical rating scale ranging from 0, indicating the least severe condition, to 100, indicating the most severe condition. Psychological well-being was assessed using the Psychological General Well-Being Index (total score ≤60 indicating severe distress) and illness behaviour using the Illness Behavior Questionnaire. Results: Pre-operative psychological well-being was not related to the objective medical parameters reflecting cardiac disease severity. In contrast, total psychological well-being scores correlated significantly with patients’ subjective ratings of disease severity (p < 0.001). When compared with the reference values from the Italian population, the mean scores of the patients on psychological well-being were similar. As regards the Illness Behavior Questionnaire, the scores on denial were higher and those on hypochondria were lower compared with other hospitalised patients. Conclusions: This study shows that the perception of cardiac disease severity, and not the medical parameters in congenital heart disease, is related to the patients’ pre-operative psychological state. Thus, more importance needs to be given to assessing the patients’ pre-operative perception and psychological state independently of cardiac severity. Targeted interventions with regard to the cardiac condition are recommended.

Keywords

Paediatric cardiologypsychologyquality of life
Type
Original Articles
Information
Cardiology in the Young , Volume 24 , Issue 2 , April 2014 , pp. 275 - 282
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2013 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Warnes, CA. The adult with congenital heart disease: born to be bad? J Am Coll Cardiol 2005; 46: 1–8.Google Scholar
2. Oechslin, EN, Harrison, DA, Connelly, MS, Webb, GD, Siu, SC. Mode of death in adults with congenital heart disease. Am J Cardiol 2000; 86: 1111–1116.Google Scholar
3. Kovacs, AH, Silversides, C, Saidi, A, Sears, SF. The role of the psychologist in adult congenital heart disease. Cardiol Clin 2006; 24: 607–618, vi.Google Scholar
4. Kools, S, Tong, EM, Hughes, R, et al. Hospital experiences of young adults with congenital heart disease: divergence in expectations and dissonance in care. Am J Crit Care 2002; 11: 115–125; quiz 126–117.Google Scholar
5. Verstappen, A, Pearson, D, Kovacs, AH. Adult congenital heart disease: the patient's perspective. Cardiol Clin 2006; 24: 515–529.Google Scholar
6. Bromberg, JI, Beasley, PJ, D'Angelo, EJ, Landzberg, M, DeMaso, DR. Depression and anxiety in adults with congenital heart disease: a pilot study. Heart Lung 2003; 32: 105–110.Google Scholar
7. Horner, T, Liberthson, R, Jellinek, MS. Psychosocial profile of adults with complex congenital heart disease. Mayo Clin Proc 2000; 75: 31–36.Google Scholar
8. Kovacs, AH, Saidi, AS, Kuhl, EA, et al. Depression and anxiety in adult congenital heart disease: predictors and prevalence. Int J Cardiol 2008; 137: 158–164.Google Scholar
9. Brandhagen, DJ, Feldt, RH, Williams, DE. Long-term psychologic implications of congenital heart disease: a 25-year follow-up. Mayo Clin Proc 1991; 66: 474–479.Google Scholar
10. Utens, EM, Verhulst, FC, Erdman, RA, et al. Psychosocial functioning of young adults after surgical correction for congenital heart disease in childhood: a follow-up study. J Psychosom Res 1994; 38: 745–758.Google Scholar
11. Popelova, J, Slavik, Z, Skovranek, J. Are cyanosed adults with congenital cardiac malformations depressed? Cardiol Young 2001; 11: 379–384.Google Scholar
12. van Rijen, EH, Utens, EM, Roos-Hesselink, JW, et al. Medical predictors for psychopathology in adults with operated congenital heart disease. Eur Heart J 2004; 25: 1605–1613.Google Scholar
13. Kovacs, AH, Sears, SF, Saidi, AS. Biopsychosocial experiences of adults with congenital heart disease: review of the literature. Am Heart J 2005; 150: 193–201.Google Scholar
14. van Rijen, EH, Utens, EM, Roos-Hesselink, JW, et al. Psychosocial functioning of the adult with congenital heart disease: a 20–33 years follow-up. Eur Heart J 2003; 24: 673–683.Google Scholar
15. Moons, P, Van Deyk, K, De Geest, S, Gewillig, M, Budts, W. Is the severity of congenital heart disease associated with the quality of life and perceived health of adult patients? Heart 2005; 91: 1193–1198.Google Scholar
16. Chessa, M, De Rosa, G, Pardeo, M, et al. Illness understanding in adults with congenital heart disease. Ital Heart J 2005; 6: 895–899.Google Scholar
17. Gratz, A, Hess, J, Hager, A. Self-estimated physical functioning poorly predicts actual exercise capacity in adolescents and adults with congenital heart disease. Eur Heart J 2009; 30: 497–504.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
18. Badia, X, Monserrat, S, Roset, M, Herdman, M. Feasibility, validity and test–retest reliability of scaling methods for health states: the visual analogue scale and the time trade-off. Qual Life Res 1999; 8: 303–310.Google Scholar
19. Moons, P Van Deyk, K De Bleser, L, et al. Quality of life and health status in adults with congenital heart disease: a direct comparison with healthy counterparts. Eur J Cardiovasc Prev Rehabil 2006; 13: 407–413.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
20. Grossi, E, Mosconi, P, Groth, N, Niero, M, Apolone, G. Questionario ‘Psychological General Well-Being Index’. Istituto di Ricerche Farmacologiche Mario Negri Milan, Versione Italiana, 2005.Google Scholar
21. Fava, GA, Bernardi, M, Pilowsky, I, Spence, ND. Versione Italiana dell'Illness Behavior Questionnaire (I.B.Q.) di Pilowsky e Spence. In: Canestrari R (ed.). Nuovi Metodi in Psicometria. Organizzazioni Speciali, Firenze, 1982, pp 65–76.Google Scholar
22. Blom, G. Statistical Estimates and Transformed Beta-Variables. John Wiley & Sons, New York, 1958.Google Scholar
23. Fisher, RA. Frequency distribution of the values of the correlation coefficient in samples of an indefinitely large population. Biometrika (Biometrika Trust) 1915; 10: 507–521.Google Scholar
24. Fisher, RA. On the ‘probable error’ of a coefficient of correlation deduced from a small sample. Metron 1921; 1: 3–32.Google Scholar
25. Kramer, CY. Extension of multiple range tests to group means with unequal numbers of replications. Biometrics 1956; 12: 307–310.Google Scholar
26. SAS Institute Inc. SAS 9.1.3 Help and Documentation. SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC, 2000–2004.Google Scholar
27. Shewan, LG, Coats, AJ. Ethics in the authorship and publishing of scientific articles. Int J Cardiol 2010; 144: 1–2.Google Scholar
28. Webb, GD Williams, RG. Care of the Adult with Congenital Heart Disease. Presented at the 32nd Bethesda Conference, Bethesda, Maryland, October 2–3, 2000. J Am Coll Cardiol 2001; 37: 1161–1198.Google Scholar
29. DeMaso, DR, Gonzalez-Heydrich, J, Erickson, JD, Grimes, VP, Strohecker, C. The experience journal: a computer-based intervention for families facing congenital heart disease. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry 2000; 39: 727–734.Google Scholar
30. van Rijen, EH, Utens, EM, Roos-Hesselink, JW, et al. Longitudinal development of psychopathology in an adult congenital heart disease cohort. Int J Cardiol 2005; 99: 315–323.Google Scholar
Supplementary material: Image

Callus supplementary material

Callus supplementary material

Download Callus supplementary material(Image)
Image 41.4 KB