Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-l7hp2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T02:03:57.910Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Echocardiographic parameters for assessing successful balloon mitral valvuloplasty in juvenile age groups

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  16 November 2015

Ajith Ananthakrishna Pillai*
Affiliation:
Department of Cardiology, Jawaharlal Institute of Postgraduate Medical Education and Research, Pondicherry, India
Geofi George
Affiliation:
Department of Cardiology, Jawaharlal Institute of Postgraduate Medical Education and Research, Pondicherry, India
Harichandrakumar Kottyen Thazhath
Affiliation:
Department of Biometrics and Statistics, Jawaharlal Institute of Postgraduate Medical Education and Research, Pondicherry, India
Sreekanth Yerram
Affiliation:
Department of Cardiology, Jawaharlal Institute of Postgraduate Medical Education and Research, Pondicherry, India
*
Correspondence to: A. A. Pillai, Department of Cardiology, Jawaharlal Institute of Postgraduate Medical Education and Research, Dhanvantri Nagar Post, Pondicherry 605006, India. Tel: 0091-4137299; FAX: 4132277167; E-mail: [email protected]

Abstract

Background

Different echocardiographic parameters have been studied and validated for assessing the severity of mitral stenosis; however, scant data are available for these markers in the context of balloon mitral valvuloplasty in juvenile age groups (ages ⩽20 years).

Objectives

The aim of the present study was to find out the utility of echocardiographic parameters such as mitral valve separation index, left atrial volume, right ventricular systolic pressure, tricuspid annular plane systolic excursion, tricuspid annular systolic velocity, and right ventricular Tei index in predicting success of balloon mitral valvuloplasty and their relation to mitral valve area in juvenile mitral stenosis.

Methods

We carried out a prospective single-centre study involving 52 juvenile mitral stenosis patients undergoing elective valvuloplasty. Success was defined as an increase in mitral valve area ⩾50% or ⩾1.5 cm2. Echocardiographic measurements were taken before and 24 hours after the procedure and statistical analyses were carried out.

Results

The mean age of the study population was 14.3 years (SD ±4.55), ranging from 7 to 20 years. Valvuloplasty was successful in 49 out of 52 patients. The mean valve area improved from 0.89 (SD ±0.16) to 1.73 (SD ±0.22) cm2/m2 (p<0.01), and the mean mitral valve gradient decreased from 19.87 (SD ±7.89) to 7.45 (SD ±2.07) (p=0.021). All the surrogate parameters improved favourably after valvuloplasty (p<0.01). The decrease in right ventricular systolic pressure was a better indicator of the success followed by the increase in valve separation index (area under the curve 0.81 and 0.76, respectively).

Conclusions

All the surrogate markers studied showed favourable improvement, and right ventricular systolic pressure reduction and improved mitral valve separation index were better indicators of successful valvuloplasty.

Type
Original Articles
Copyright
© Cambridge University Press 2015 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Vimal Raj, BS, George, P, Jose, VJ. Mitral leaflet separation index – a simple novel index to assess the severity of mitral stenosis. Indian Heart J 2008; 60: 563566.Google Scholar
2. Cheitlin, MD, Alpert, JS, Armstrong, WF, et al. ACC/AHA Guidelines for the Clinical Application of Echocardiography. A report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (Committee on Clinical Application of Echocardiography). Developed in collaboration with the American Society of Echocardiography. Circulation 1997; 95: 16861744.Google Scholar
3. Rudski, LG, Lai, WW, Afilalo, J, et al. Guidelines for the echocardiographic assessment of the right heart in adults: a report from the American Society of Echocardiography endorsed by the European Association of Echocardiography, a registered branch of the European Society of Cardiology, and the Canadian Society of Echocardiography. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 2010; 23: 685713.Google Scholar
4. Salem Omar, AM, Tanaka, H, Abdel Dayem, TK, et al. Comparison of mitral valve area by pressure half time and proximal isovelocity surface area method in patients with mitral stenosis: effect of net atrioventricular compliance. Eur J Echocardiogr 2011; 12: 283290.Google Scholar
5. Fisher, ML, Parisi, AF, Plotnick, GD. Assessment of severity of mitral stenosis by echocardiographic leafet separation. Arch Intern Med 1979; 139: 402406.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6. Seow, SC, Koh, LP, Yeo, TC. Hemodynamic significance of mitral stenosis: use of a simple, novel index by 2-dimensional echocardiography. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 2006; 19: 102106.Google Scholar
7. Duggal, B, Bajaj, M, Prabhu, S, et al. The mitral leaflet separation index for assessment of mitral stenosis during percutaneous mitral commissurotomy: validation of the index in the immediate post-PMC period. Echocardiography 2012; 29: 11431148.Google Scholar
8. Bartunek, J, Vantrimpont, PJ, De Bruyne, B. Left atrial-volume determination by echocardiography. Validation by biplane angiography in the setting of mitral balloon valvuloplasty. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging 1994; 10: 263268.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
9. Bitigen, A, Türkmen, M, Karakaya, O, et al. Early effects of percutaneous mitral valvuloplasty on left atrial mechanical functions. Tohoku J Exp Med 2006; 209: 285289.Google Scholar
10. Bensaid, A, Krapf, L, Malanca, M, et al. Echocardiographic right ventricular function assessment before and after successful percutaneous mitral commissurotomy. J Heart Valve Dis 2011; 20: 627632.Google Scholar
11. Mahfouz, RA, Elawady, W, Hossein, E, et al. Impact of atrioventricular compliance on clinical outcome of patients undergoing successful percutaneous balloon mitral valvuloplasty. Echocardiography 2013; 30: 11871193.Google Scholar
12. Sade, LE, Ozin, B, Ulus, T, et al. Right ventricular contractile reserve in mitral stenosis: implications on hemodynamic burden and clinical outcome. Int J Cardiol 2009; 135: 193201.Google Scholar
13. Grignola, JC, Gines, F, Guzzo, D. Comparison of Tei index with invasive measurements of right ventricular function. Int J Cardiol 2006; 113: 2533.Google Scholar
14. Dev, V, Shrivastava, S. Time course of changes in pulmonary vascular resistance and the mechanism of regression of pulmonary arterial hypertension after balloon mitral valvuloplasty. Am J Cardiol 1991; 67: 439442.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
15. Block, PC, Palacios, IF. Pulmonary vascular dynamics after percutaneous mitral valvotomy. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1988; 96: 3943.Google Scholar
16. Maoqin, S, Guoxiang, H, Zhiyuan, S, et al. The clinical and hemodynamic results of mitral balloon valvuloplasty for patients with mitral stenosis complicated by severe pulmonary hypertension. Eur J Intern Med 2005; 16: 413418.Google Scholar
17. Sagie, A, Freitas, N, Chen, MH, et al. Echocardiographic assessment of mitral stenosis and its associated valvular lesions in 205 patients and lack of association with mitral valve prolapse. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 1997; 10: 141148.Google Scholar
18. Palacios, I, Block, PC, Brandi, S, et al. Percutaneous balloon valvotomy for patients with severe mitral stenosis. Circulation 1987; 75: 778784.Google Scholar
19. Levine, MJ, Weinstein, JS, Diver, DJ, et al. Progressive improvement in pulmonary vascular resistance after percutaneous mitral valvuloplasty. Circulation 1989; 79: 10611067.Google Scholar