Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-xbtfd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-08T10:34:10.615Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Early clinical experience with use of the ‘Amplatzer Septal Occluder’ device for atrial septal defect

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 August 2008

James L Wilkinson*
Affiliation:
Department of Cardiology, Royal Children's Hospital, Flemington Road, Parkville, 3052, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
Tiow Hoe Goh
Affiliation:
Department of Cardiology, Royal Children's Hospital, Flemington Road, Parkville, 3052, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
*
James L Wilkinson Tel: 61 3 9345 5717, Fax: 61 3 9345 6001; E-mail: [email protected]

Abstract

Device closure of oval fossa atrial scptal defects with the Amplatzer Septal Occluder was performed in 26 patients ranging in age from 0.89 to 60.44 years. In eight additional patients no device implant was performed because of the presence of multiple defects or because the defect was of a size unsuitable for closure with the devices currently available. The strectched diameter of the defects that were closed ranged from 4 to 23 mm (mean 14±5.4 mm) and device sizes ranged from 4 to 24 mm. Two devices were unstable, of which one embolized to the right atrium after release. Both devices were retrived at the same procedure. One of these parients subsequently underwent a successful device closure of his defect using a larger (24-mm) device. Three patients had multiple defects, which were successfully closed with a single device. At 1-month follow-up 23/26 (88%) and at 3-month follow-up 22/24 (92%) patients had complete closure of their defects, while two had residual shunts. One further patient who had complete closure of his defect at 1-month post-implant had his device removed and his atrial septal defect patched surgically 8 weeks after device closure. This was done as a result of the development of a vegetation affecting the device after an episode of septicaemia, which was not relate to the cardiac problems. There was no procedure-related morbidty or martality and all patients remain well at the present time.

Type
Original Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1998

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1.Mills, NL, King, TD. Non operative closure of left to right shunts. J Thorac Cardrovasc Surg 1976; 72: 371378.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2.King, TD, Mills, NL. Nonoperative clousre of atrial septal defects. Surgery 1974; 75: 383388.Google ScholarPubMed
3.Rome, JJ, Keane, JF, Perry, SB, Spevak, PJ, Lock, JE. Double–unbrella closure of atrial defects. Intial climcal applications. Circulation 1990; 82:751758.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
4.Lock, JE, Rome, JJ, Davis, R, VanPraagh, S, Perry, SB, VanPraagh, R, Keane, JF. Transcatheter closure of atrial septal defects. Experimental studies. Circulation 1989; 79: 10911099.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
5.Rosenfeld, HM, vander, VeldeME, Sander, SP, Colan, SD, Parness, IA, Lock, JE, Spevak, PJ. Echocardiographic predictors of candidacy for successful transcatheter atrical septal defect closure. Cather Cardiovasc Diagn 1995; 34: 2934.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6.Hickey, PR, Wessel, DL, Streitz, SL, Fox, ML, Kern, FH, Bridges, ND, Hansen, DD. Transcatheter closure of atrial septal defects: hemodynamic complication and anesthetic management. Anesth Analg 1992; 74: 4450.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
7.Sievert, H, Babic, UU, Ensslen, R, Scherer, D, Spies, H, Wiederspahn, T, Zeplin, HE. Transcatheter closure of large atrial sepral defects with the Babic system. Cather Cardiovasc Diagn. 1995; 36: 232240.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
8.Sievert, H, Babic, UU, Ensslen, R, Merle, H, Osypka, P, Rubel, C, Scherer, D, Spies, H, Wiederspahn, T, Zeplin, HE. Occlusion of atrial septal defect with a new occlusive device. Z Cardiol 1996; 85: 97103.Google ScholarPubMed
9.Hausdorf, G, Schneider, M, Franzbach, B, Kampmann, C, Kargus, K, Goeldner, B. Transcatheter closure of secundum atrial septal defects with the atrial septal defect occlusion system (ASDOS): initial experience in children. Heart 1996; 75: 8388.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
10.Agarwal, SK, Ghosh, PK, Mittal, PK. Failure of devices used for closure of atrial septal defects: mechanisms and management. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1996; 112: 2126.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
11.Ende, DJ, Chopra, PS, Rao, PS. Transcatheter closure of atrial septal defect or patent foramen ovale with the buttoned device for prevention of recurrence of paradoxic embolism. Am J Cardiol 1996; 78: 233236.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
12.Hellmuler, B, Kaufmann, U, Aeschbacher, B, Fluri, M, Meier, B. Catheter closure in atrial septal defects and open foramen ovale using the Sidens buttoned device. Schweiz Med Wochenchr 1996; 26: 11431150.Google Scholar
13.Arora, R, Trehan, VK, Kalra, GS, Chawla, R, Jhamb, U, Nigam, M, Kenchaiah, KS, Bhardwaj, S, Khalilullah, M. Trancatheter closure of atrial septal defect using buttoned device—Indian experience. Indian Heart J 1996; 48: 145149.Google Scholar
14.Sideris, EB, Leung, M, Yoon, JH, Chen, CR, Lochan, R, Worms, AM, Rey, C, Meier, B. Occlusion of large atrial septal defects with a centering buttoned device: early clinical experience. Am Heart J 1996; 131: 356359.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
15.Rao, PS, Ende, DJWilson, AD, Smith, PA, Chopra, PS. Followup results device. Can J Cardiol 1995; 11: 695701.Google ScholarPubMed
16.Rao, PS, Sideris, EB, Hausdorf, F, Rey, C, Beekman, RH, Worms, AM, Bourlon, F, Onorato, E, Khalilyllah, M et al. International experience with secundum atrial septal defect occlusion by the buttoned device. Am Heart J 1994; 128: 10221035.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
17.Bohm, J, Bittigau, K, Kohler, F, Baumann, G, Konertz, W. Surgical removal of atrial septal defect occlusion system–devices. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 1997; 12: 869872.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
18.Gildein, HP, Dabritz, S, Geibel, A, Sarai, K, Vazquez, Jimenez J, Hugel, W, Mocellin, R. Transcatheter closure of atrial septal defects by the ‘buttoned’ device: complications and need for surgical revision. Pediatr Cardiol 1997; 18: 328331.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
19.Sharaffudin, MJ, Gu, X, Titus, J, Urness, M, Cervera, Cebellos JJ, Amplatz, K. Transvenous closure of secundum atrial septal defects: preliminary results with a new self–expanding Nitinol prosthesis in a swine model. Circulation 1997; 95: 21622168.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
20.Bjornstad, PG, Smevik, B, Fiane, AE, Tonnessen, TI, Fosse, E. Catheter based closure of atrial septal defects with a newly developed Nitinol double disc: an experimental study. Cardiol Young 1997; 7: 220224.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
21.Bjornstad, PG, Masura, J, Thaulow, E, Smevik, B, Michelsen, SS, Tonnessen, Tl, Seem, E, Fosse, E. Interventional closure of atrial septal defects with the Amplatzer device: first clinical experience. Cardiol Young 1997; 7: 277283.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
22.Masura, J, Gavora, P, and Formanek, A. First human experience with the Amplatzer septal occluder. In 2nd World Congress of Pediatric Cardiology and Cardiac Surgery, 11–15 May, 1997; Hawaii, 1997, abstract 085.Google Scholar
23.Wilkinson, JL, Goh, TH. Preliminary experience with use of the ‘ASO’ retractable ASD device. In 2nd World Congress of Pediatric Cardiology and Cardiac Surgery 11–15 May, 1997, Hawaii, 1997, abstract 082.Google Scholar
24.Thanopoulos, BD, Tsaousis, GS, Laskari, CV, Papadopoulos, GS, Vekiou, A, Amplatz, K. Closure of atrial septal defects with the Amplatzer occluder device: preliminary results. In 2nd World Congress of Pediatric Cardiology and Cardiac Surgery, 11—15 May, 1997; Hawaii, 1997, abstract 086.Google Scholar
25.Chan, KC, Godman, MJ, Wilson, N. Transcatheter closure of atrial septal defect (ASD) with a new Nitinol double disk device (Amplatzer Septal Occluder, ASO): United Kingdom experience. In 2nd World Congress of Pediatric Cardiology and Cardiac Surgery, 11—15 May 1997; Hawaii, 1997; abstract 431.Google Scholar
26.Gavota, P, Holan, M, Masura, J. The role of TEE during the closure of ASD with the Amplatzer septal occluder. In 2nd World Congress of Pediatric Cardiology and Cardiac Surgery, 11–15 May 1997; Hawaii, 1997, abstract P 270.Google Scholar
27.Bridges, ND, Hellenbrand, W, Latson, L, Filiano, J, Newburger, JW, Lock, JE. Transcatheter closure of patent fotamen ovale after presumed paradoxical embolism. Circulation 1992; 86: 19021908.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
28.Kopf, GS, Kleinman, CS, Hijazi, ZM, Fahey, JT, Dewar, ML, Hellenbrand, WE. Fenestrated Fontan operation with delayed ttanscatheter closure of atrial septal defect. Improved results in high–risk patients. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1992; 103: 10391047.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
29.Bridges, ND, Lock, JE, Castaneda, AR. Baffle fenestration with subsequent transcatheter closure. Modification of the Fontan operation for patients at increased risk. Circulation 1990; 82: 16811689.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
30.Bullock, AM, Menahem, S, Wilkinson, JL. Infective endocarditis on an occluder closing an atrial septal defect. Cardiol Young 1998 (in press).Google Scholar
31.Hekmat, K, Mehlhorn, U, Rainer deVivie E Surgical repair of a large residual atrial septal defect after transcatheter closure. Ann Thorac Surg 1997; 63: 14561458.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
32.Lloyd, TR, Rao, PS, Beekman, RH III, Mendelsohn, AM, Sideris, EB. Atrial septal defect occlusion with the buttoned device (a multi–institutional U.S. trial). Am J Cardiol 1994; 73: 286291.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed