Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7czq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T10:51:30.076Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Comparison of the offset distance of the tricuspid septal leaflet in neonates with Ebstein’s anomaly and neonates with pulmonary atresia with intact ventricular septum

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 July 2014

Min Jeong Kim ,
Jeong Jin Yu ,
So Yeon Kang ,
Chang Deok Seo ,
Jae Suk Baek ,
Young-Hwue Kim  and
Jae-Kon Ko
Min Jeong Kim
Affiliation:
Division of Pediatric Cardiology, College of Medicine, University of Ulsan, Songpa-gu, Seoul, South Korea
Jeong Jin Yu*
Affiliation:
Division of Pediatric Cardiology, College of Medicine, University of Ulsan, Songpa-gu, Seoul, South Korea
So Yeon Kang
Affiliation:
Division of Pediatric Cardiology, College of Medicine, University of Ulsan, Songpa-gu, Seoul, South Korea
Chang Deok Seo
Affiliation:
Division of Pediatric Cardiology, College of Medicine, University of Ulsan, Songpa-gu, Seoul, South Korea
Jae Suk Baek
Affiliation:
Division of Pediatric Cardiology, College of Medicine, University of Ulsan, Songpa-gu, Seoul, South Korea
Young-Hwue Kim
Affiliation:
Division of Pediatric Cardiology, College of Medicine, University of Ulsan, Songpa-gu, Seoul, South Korea
Jae-Kon Ko
Affiliation:
Division of Pediatric Cardiology, College of Medicine, University of Ulsan, Songpa-gu, Seoul, South Korea
*
Correspondence to: J. J. Yu, MD, Asan Medical Center, Division of Pediatric Cardiology, 88 Olympic-ro 43-gil, Songpa-gu, Seoul 138-736, South Korea. Tel: +8 223 010 3924; Fax: +822 473 3725; E-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An indexed offset distance of the tricuspid septal leaflet ⩾8 mm/m2 is a quantitative criterion for the diagnosis of Ebstein’s anomaly. The purpose of this study was to investigate the validity of this criterion for the discrimination of Ebstein’s anomaly from pulmonary atresia with intact ventricular septum in neonatal patients. A total of 122 neonatal patients, 56 with Ebstein’s anomaly and 66 with pulmonary atresia with intact ventricular septum, were enrolled. Diagnosis of each anomaly was based on typical morphologic features. Echocardiographic variables, including the offset distance of the tricuspid septal leaflet, were measured via an offline analysis of images recorded before 1 month of age. The offset distance of the tricuspid septal leaflet was indexed by the body surface area, and the indexed offset distances in the Ebstein’s anomaly and pulmonary atresia with intact ventricular septum groups were 34.2 mm/m2 (7.1–119.1 mm/m2) and 7.2 mm/m2 (0.0–25.6 mm/m2), respectively. The indexed offset distance was ⩾8 mm/m2 in 29 (43.9%) of the patients with pulmonary atresia with intact ventricular septum; clinical and echocardiographic characteristics were comparable between these 29 patients and the remaining 37 patients with pulmonary atresia with intact ventricular septum. When an indexed offset distance ⩾8 mm/m2 was applied as a cut-off for the diagnosis of Ebstein’s anomaly, the sensitivity was 0.963 and the specificity was 0.561. In conclusion, indexed offset distance ⩾8 mm/m2 cannot be used as a cut-off for the diagnosis of complicated Ebstein’s anomaly in neonatal patients with pulmonary atresia with intact ventricular septum.

Keywords

Ebstein’s anomalypulmonary atresianewbornechocardiography
Type
Original Articles
Information
Cardiology in the Young , Volume 25 , Issue 1 , January 2015 , pp. 129 - 136
Copyright
© Cambridge University Press 2014 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Dearani, JA, Danielson, GK. Congenital heart surgery nomenclature and database project: Ebstein’s anomaly and tricuspid valve disease. Ann Thorac Surg 2000; 69: S106–S117.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
2. Celermajer, DS, Bull, C, Till, JA, et al. Ebstein’s anomaly: presentation and outcome from fetus to adult. J Am Coll Cardiol 1994; 23: 170–176.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
3. Yetman, AT, Freedom, RM, McCrindle, BW. Outcome in cyanotic neonates with Ebstein’s anomaly. Am J Cardiol 1998; 81: 749–754.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
4. Jaquiss, RDB, Imamura, M. Management of Ebstein’s anomaly and pure tricuspid insufficiency in the neonate. Semin Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2007; 19: 258–263.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
5. Wald, RM, Adatia, I, Van Arsdell, GS, Hornberger, LK. Relation of limiting ductal patency to survival in neonatal Ebstein’s anomaly. Am J Cardiol 2005; 96: 851–856.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
6. Oxenius, A, Attenhofer Jost, CH, Prêtre, R, et al. Management and outcome of Ebstein’s anomaly in children. Cardiol Young 2012; 15: 1–8.Google Scholar
7. Yu, JJ, Yun, TJ, Won, HS, et al. Outcome of neonates with Ebstein’s anomaly in the current era. Pediatr Cardiol 2013; 34: 1590–1596.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
8. Dyamenahalli, U, McCrindle, BW, McDonald, C, et al. Pulmonary atresia with intact ventricular septum: management of, and outcomes for, a cohort of 210 consecutive patients. Cardiol Young 2004; 14: 299–308.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
9. Daubeney, PEF, Wang, D, Delany, DJ, et al. Pulmonary atresia with intact ventricular septum: predictors of early and medium-term outcome in a population-based study. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2005; 130: 1071–1078.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
10. Kobza, R, Kurz, DJ, Oechslin, EN, et al. Aberrant tendinous chords with tethering of the tricuspid leaflets: a congenital anomaly causing severe tricuspid regurgitation. Heart 2004; 90: 319–323.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
11. Attenhofer Jost, CH, Connolly, HM, Dearani, JA, Edwards, WD, Danielson, GK. Ebstein’s Anomaly. Circulation 2007; 115: 277–285.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
12. Kapusta, L, Eveleigh, RM, Poulino, SE, et al. Ebstein’s anomaly: factors associated with death in childhood and adolescence: a multi-centre, long-term study. Eur Heart J 2007; 28: 2661–2666.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
13. Paranon, S, Acar, P. Ebstein’s anomaly of the tricuspid valve: from fetus to adult. Heart 2008; 94: 237–243.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
14. Chang, YM, Wang, JK, Chiu, SN, et al. Clinical spectrum and long-term outcome of Ebstein’s anomaly based on a 26-year experience in an Asian cohort. Eur J Pediatr 2009; 168: 685–690.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
15. Boston, US, Goldberg, SP, Ward, KE, et al. Complete repair of Ebstein anomaly in neonates and young infants: a 16-year follow-up. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2011; 141: 1163–1169.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
16. Muraru, D, Badano, LP, Sarais, C, Soldà, E, Iliceto, S. Evaluation of tricuspid valve morphology and function by transthoracic three-dimensional echocardiography. Curr Cardiol Rep 2011; 13: 242–249.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
17. Krieger, EV, Valente, AM. Diagnosis and management of Ebstein anomaly of the tricuspid valve. Curr Treat Options Cardiovasc Med 2012; 14: 594–607.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
18. Shiina, A, Seward, JB, Edwards, WD, Hagler, DJ, Tajik, AJ. Two-dimensional echocardiographic spectrum of Ebstein’s anomaly: detailed anatomic assessment. J Am Coll Cardiol 1984; 3: 356–370.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
19. Gussenhoven, EJ, Stewart, PA, Becker, AE, Essed, CE, Lightvoet, KM, De Villeneuve, VH. ‘Offsetting’ of the septal tricuspid leaflet in normal hearts and in hearts with Ebstein’s anomaly. Am J Cardiol 1984; 53: 172–176.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
20. Haycock, GB, Schwartz, GJ, Wisotsky, DH. Geometric method for measuring body surface area: a height-weight formula validated in infants, children, and adults. J Pediatr 1978; 93: 62–66.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
21. Pettersen, MD, Du, W, Skeens, ME, Humes, RA. Regression equations for calculation of z scores of cardiac structures in a large cohort of healthy infants, children, and adolescents: an echocardiographic study. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 2008; 21: 922–934.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
22. Vettraino, IM, Huang, R, Cornstock, CH. The normal offset of the tricuspid septal leaflet in the fetus. J Ultrasound Med 2002; 21: 1099–1104.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
23. Choi, YH, Seo, JW, Choi, JY, Yun, YS, Kim, SH, Lee, HJ. Morphology of tricuspid valve in pulmonary atresia with intact ventricular septum. Pediatr Cardiol 1998; 19: 381–389.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
24. Hanley, FL, Sade, RM, Blackstone, EH, Kirklin, JW, Freedom, RM, Nanda, NC. Outcomes in neonatal pulmonary atresia with intact ventricular septum. A multiinstitutional study. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1993; 105: 406–423.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
25. Anderson, KR, Zuberbuhler, JR, Anderson, RH, Becker, AE, Lie, JT. Morphologic spectrum of Ebstein’s anomaly of the heart. Mayo Clin Proc 1979; 54: 174–180.Google ScholarPubMed
26. Rusconi, PG, Zuberbuhler, JR, Anderson, RH, Rigby, ML. Morphologic-echocardiographic correlates of Ebstein’s malformation. Eur Heart J 1991; 12: 784–790.Google ScholarPubMed
27. Jiang, GP, Gao, LC, Gong, FQ, He, J, Ye, JJ. A new method for evaluating tricuspid valve displacement in children with Ebstein’s anomaly: using the annulus and coronary sinus as a reference point. Pediatr Cardiol 2014; 35: 270–275.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed