Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rcrh6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-27T10:40:33.206Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A beneficial technique for preventing the device protrusion to the aorta during percutaneous patent ductus arteriosus closure: “Balloon-assisted device releasing technique”

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 September 2019

Serdar Epçaçan Open the ORCID record for Serdar Epçaçan [Opens in a new window] ,
Mustafa Orhan Bulut Open the ORCID record for Mustafa Orhan Bulut [Opens in a new window] ,
İlker Kemal Yücel Open the ORCID record for İlker Kemal Yücel [Opens in a new window]  and
Ahmet Çelebi Open the ORCID record for Ahmet Çelebi [Opens in a new window]
Serdar Epçaçan*
Affiliation:
Department of Paediatric Cardiology, Van Training and Research Hospital, University of Health Sciences, Van, Turkey
Mustafa Orhan Bulut
Affiliation:
Department of Paediatric Cardiology, Dr. Siyami Ersek Hospital for Cardiology and Cardiovascular Surgery, University of Health Sciences, Istanbul, Turkey
İlker Kemal Yücel
Affiliation:
Department of Paediatric Cardiology, Dr. Siyami Ersek Hospital for Cardiology and Cardiovascular Surgery, University of Health Sciences, Istanbul, Turkey
Ahmet Çelebi
Affiliation:
Department of Paediatric Cardiology, Dr. Siyami Ersek Hospital for Cardiology and Cardiovascular Surgery, University of Health Sciences, Istanbul, Turkey
*
Author for correspondence: S. Epçaçan, MD, Department of Pediatric Cardiology, Van Training and Research Hospital, University of Health Sciences, 65100, Edremit, Van, Turkey. Tel: +90 505 454 14 84; E-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Background:

Although percutaneous closure of patent ductus arteriosus is an established safe procedure, protrusion of the device to descending aorta may occur in various degrees during these procedures, especially in small infants. The aim of our study is to evaluate the benefits of balloon-assisted device releasing technique in the era of preventing device protrusion and conditions related to protrusion.

Methods:

One hundred and fifty-five infants, who underwent patent ductus arteriosus closure with Amplatzer duct occluder I device between January, 2012 and December, 2018, were retrospectively analysed. Balloon-assisted device releasing technique was used in 20 cases (group 1, 12.9%), between January, 2015 and December, 2018. Procedures in which the technique had been used were compared with the remaining ones (group 2, 87.1%, n = 135) with regard to device stabilisation, aortic disc protrusion to the aorta, iatrogenic coarctation, and device embolisation.

Results:

There was no significant difference by means of gender, age, weight, and the ductal diameter, whereas the average mean pulmonary artery pressure was significantly higher in group 1. Device protrusion and related complications were significantly higher in group 2; thus, additional catheterisations or surgical interventions were required, while no additional intervention was required in group 1.

Conclusion:

The balloon-assisted device releasing technique provides a good device stabilisation and prevents protrusion of the device and related complications during percutaneous patent ductus arteriosus closure in selected cases.

Keywords

Patent ductus arteriosus closuredevice protrusioncoarctationembolisationballoon-assisted device releasing
Type
Original Article
Information
Cardiology in the Young , Volume 29 , Issue 11 , November 2019 , pp. 1380 - 1386
Copyright
© Cambridge University Press 2019 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Baruteau, AE, Hascoet, S, Baruteau, J, et al. Transcatheter closure of patent ductus arteriosus: past, present and future. Arch Cardiovasc Dis 2014; 107: 122–132.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Baspinar, O, Sahin, DA, Sulu, A, et al. Transcatheter closure of patent ductus arteriosus in under 6 kg and premature infants. J Interv Cardiol 2015; 28: 180–189.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Santoro, G, Giordano, M, Gaio, G, et al. Transcatheter closure of arterial duct in infants < 6 kg: Amplatzer duct occluder type I vs Amplatzer duct occluder II additional sizes. Pediatr Cardiol 2018; 39: 627–632.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pass, RH, Hijazi, Z, Hsu, DT, Lewis, V, Hellenbrand, WE. Multicenter USA Amplatzer patent ductus arteriosus occlusion device trial: initial and one-year results. J Am Coll Cardiol 2004; 44: 513–519.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Parra-Bravo, R, Cruz-Ramirez, A, Rebolledo-Pineda, V, et al. Transcatheter closure of patent ductus arteriosus using the amplatzer duct occluder in infants under 1 year of age. Rev Esp Cardiol 2009; 62: 867–874.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Masura, J, Tittel, P, Gavora, P, Podnar, T. Long-term outcome of transcatheter patent ductus arteriosus closure using Amplatzer duct occluders. Am Heart J 2006; 151: 755 e7–755 e10.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Saliba, Z, El-rassi, I, Helou, D, et al. Development of catheter-based treatment of patent ductus arteriosus: a medium-sized centre experience. Arch Cardiovasc Dis 2009; 102: 111–118.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Masri, S, El Rassi, I, Arabi, M, Tabbakh, A, Bitar, F. Percutaneous closure of patent ductus arteriosus in children using amplatzer duct occluder II: relationship between PDA type and risk of device protrusion into the descending aorta. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 2015; 86: E66–E72.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ewert, P. Challenges encountered during closure of patent ductus arteriosus. Pediatr Cardiol 2005; 26: 224–229.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Backes, CH, Kennedy, KF, Locke, M, et al. Transcatheter occlusion of the patent ductus arteriosus in 747 infants <6 kg: insights from the NCDR IMPACT registry. JACC Cardiovasc Interv 2017; 10: 1729–1737.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Choi, GJ, Song, J, Kim, ES, Lee, HL, Huh, J, Kang, IS. Outcomes of transcatheter closure of ductus arteriosus in infants less than six months of age – a single-center experience. Korean J Pediatr 2018; 61: 397–402.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Buys, DG, Greig, C, Brown, SC. ASD and PDA closure with CeraTM and CeraFlexTM devices. SA Heart 2016; 13: 6–10.Google Scholar
Krichenko, A, Benson, LN, Burrows, P, Moes, CA, McLaughlin, P, Freedom, RM. Angiographic classification of the isolated, persistently patent ductus arteriosus and implications for percutaneous catheter occlusion. Am J Cardiol 1989; 63: 877–880.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Backes, CH, Rivera, BK, Bridge, JA, et al. Percutaneous patent ductus arteriosus (PDA) closure during infancy: a meta-analysis. Pediatrics 2017; 139: e20162927.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dimas, VV, Takao, C, Ing, FF, et al. Outcomes of transcatheter occlusion of patent ductus arteriosus in infants weighing ≤6 kg. JACC Cardiovasc Interv 2010; 3: 1295–1299.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Liddy, S, Oslizlok, P, Walsh, KP. Comparison of the results of transcatheter closure of patent ductus arteriosus with newer Amplatzer devices. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 2013; 82: 253–259.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Behjati-Ardakani, M, Behjati-Ardakani, MA, Hosseini, SH, Noori, N. Long-term results of transcatheter closure of patent ductus arteriosus in infants using amplatzer duct occluder. Iran J Pediatr 2013; 23: 411–416.Google ScholarPubMed
Epcacan, S, Bulut, MO, Yucel, IK, Ceviz, N, Celebi, A. Preliminary results of the CeraflexTM PDA occluder and device behaviour during releasing. Cardiol Young 2019; 29: 519–523.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Abadir, S, Boudjemline, Y, Rey, C, et al. Significant persistent ductus arteriosus in infants less or equal to 6 kg: percutaneous closure or surgery? Arch Cardiovasc Dis 2009; 102: 533–540.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed