Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-s2hrs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-08T08:21:26.812Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

An echocardiographic index for decompensation of the chronically volume-overloaded left ventricle in children

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 November 2005

Kalimuddin Aziz
Affiliation:
Department of Cardiology, National Institute of Cardiovascular Diseases, Karachi, Pakistan

Extract

Aims: The criterions for the timing of surgical intervention in children with rheumatic mitral or aortic valvar regurgitation are not defined. I hypothesized that, in children with chronic mitral or aortic regurgitation, an index for decompensation could be created by using the ratio of the diastolic left ventricular wall thickness to the radius, and that such an index could prove useful in determining the optimal time for surgical intervention. Methods: The left ventricular echocardiograms were obtained at the tips of the leaflets of the mitral valve by M-mode echocardiography. The diastolic septal wall thickness was measured between the right and left ventricular endocardial layers, and the posterior wall thickness between the endocardium and the interphase between the epicardium and the myocardium. The left ventricular diastolic dimension was then measured, between the posterior and septal wall endocardial layers, and systolic dimension as the smallest distance detected between these layers. All diastolic measurements were made at the time of the R wave of electrocardiogram, using the leading edge technique. The ratio of wall thickness was measured using the mean of septal and posterior wall thicknesses divided by half the diastolic dimensions, the normalized thickness of the wall previously referred to as the h/r ratio and relative mural thickness. Results: The ratio of wall thickness to left ventricular radius, and its relation to systolic left ventricular pressure or systolic blood pressure, was found to be linear in 89 normal school children, and 39 children with aortic stenosis. For future predictions, I calculated the 95th percentile limits and the 95th percentile confidence bands for this relation. Using the same data, it proved possible to calculate ratios of wall thickness for various ranges of either systolic blood pressure or left ventricular peak pressure. By using the normal limits of 0.356 plus or minus 0.0316 of the ratio, appropriate for the systolic blood pressure of children with mitral regurgitation, I determined the adequacy of the ratio of wall thickness. Of the children, 51 were in ventricular failure, and these had an inadequate ratio, below two standard deviation. Of the others, 21 had an inadequate ratio to within minus one to minus two standard deviations, and 12 of these were asymptomatic, 8 were symptomatic, but only one was in ventricular failure. For 18 children with aortic regurgitation, using the same limits, one child was within 1 standard deviation and was asymptomatic, 8 fell within minus 1 to minus 2 standard deviations and 2 of these were symptomatic, 5 were in ventricular failure, and 1 was asymptomatic, while the other 9 had ratios falling less than minus 2 standard deviations, and all were in ventricular failure. Conclusion: I conclude that the index of normalized wall thickness defined as the ratio of the left ventricular wall thickness to its radius is adequate, and within normal limits, when there is compensated volume overload, but is inadequate and below normal limits when the volume overloaded left ventricle becomes decompensated. My data suggests that the persistently decreasing ratio of wall thickness below the limits of normality serves as an indicator of ventricular decompensation, and thus can be used as a new criterion for determining the optimal time for surgical intervention.

Type
Original Article
Copyright
© 2005 Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Borer J. Aortic valve replacement for the asymptomatic patients with aortic regurgitation. A new piece of strategic puzzle [Editorial]. Circulation 2002; 106: 26372639.Google Scholar
Stewart JW. Myocardial factor for timing of surgery in asymptomatic patients with mitral regurgitation [Editorial]. Am Heart J 2003; 146: 58.Google Scholar
Haluska BA, Short L, Marwick TH. Relationship of ventricular longitudinal function to contractile reserve in patients with mitral regurgitation. Am Heart J 2003; 146: 183188.Google Scholar
Borrow KM. Surgical outcome in chronic aortic regurgitation. A physiologic framework for assessing preoperative predictors. J Am Coll Cardiol 1987; 10: 11651170.Google Scholar
Bonow RO, Lakatos E, Maron BJ, Epstein E. Serial long term assessment of the natural history of asymptomatic patients with chronic aortic regurgitation and normal left ventricular systolic function. Circulation 1991; 84: 16281635.Google Scholar
Rapaport E. Natural history of aortic and mitral valve disease. Am J Cardiol 1975; 35: 221227.Google Scholar
Otto CM. Clinical practice. Evaluation and management of chronic mitral regurgitation. N Engl J Med 2001; 345: 740746.Google Scholar
Wisenbaugh T. Unexpected dismal left ventricular function after surgery for mitral regurgitation [Editorial]. J Am Coll Cardiol 2003; 42: 464465.Google Scholar
Bonow R, Carbello B, de Leon AC, et al. ACC/AHA Guidelines for the management of patients with valvular heart disease: executive summary. A report of the American College of Cardiology/ American Heart Association. Task force practice guidelines (Committee on management of patients with valvular heart diseases). Circulation 1998; 98: 19491984.Google Scholar
Matsumura T, Ohtaki F, Tanaka T, et al. Echocardiographic prediction of left ventricular function after mitral valve repair for mitral regurgitation as indication to decide the optimal time of repair. J Am Coll Cardiol 2003; 42: 458463.Google Scholar
Ford LE. Heart size. Circ Res 1976; 39: 297303.Google Scholar
Gash WH, Andrias CW, Levine HJ. Left ventricular radius to wall thickness ratio. Am J Cardiol 1979; 43: 11891194.Google Scholar
Grossman W, Jones D, Mclaurin LP. Wall stress and patterns of hypertrophy in human left ventricle. J Clin Invest 1975; 56: 5664.Google Scholar
Grant G, Green A, Bunnel IL. Left ventricular enlargement and hypertrophy. A clinical angiographic study. Am J Med 1965; 39: 895904.Google Scholar
Levine ND, Rockoff SD, Braunwald E. An angiographic analysis of the thickness of the left ventricular wall and cavity in aortic stenosis and other valvular lesions. Circulation 1963; 28: 339345.Google Scholar
Aziz KU, Van Grondelle A, Paul MH, Muster AJ. Echocardiographic assessment of the relation between left ventricular wall and cavity dimensions and peak systolic pressure in children with aortic stenosis. Am J Cardiol 1977; 40: 775780.Google Scholar
Berry TE, Aziz KU, Paul MH. Echocardiographic assessment of discrete subaortic stenosis. Am J Cardiol 1979; 43: 957961.Google Scholar
Aziz KU, Paul MH, Wessel HU. Assessment of appropriateness of left ventricular muscle thickness by M-mode echocardiogram in health and disease. Am J Cardiol 1982; 49: 963.Google Scholar
Reichek N, Devereux RB. Reliable estimation of peak left ventricular systolic pressure by M mode echographic determined end diastolic relative wall thickness: identification of severe aortic valvular aortic stenosis in adult patients. Am Heart J 1982; 103: 202203.Google Scholar
Devereux RB. Noninvasive evaluation of cardiac anatomy and function in patients with hypertension. Cardiovasc Rev Rep 1982; 3: 313322.Google Scholar
Kumpuris AG, Quinones MA, Waggonver AD, Kanon DJ, Nelson JG, Miller RR. Importance of preoperative hypertrophy, wall stress and end systolic dimension as echocardiographic predictors of normalization of left ventricular dilatation after vale replacement in chronic aortic Insufficiency. Am J Cardiol 1982; 49: 10911100.Google Scholar