Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-fscjk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-18T18:38:17.219Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Transcatheter closure of the patent foramen ovale in children: intermediate-term follow-up results

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 May 2017

Kutay Sel*
Affiliation:
Department of Pediatric Cardiology, Hacettepe University Faculty of Medicine, Ihsan Doğramacı Childrens Hospital, Ankara, Turkey
Hakan H. Aykan
Affiliation:
Department of Pediatric Cardiology, Hacettepe University Faculty of Medicine, Ihsan Doğramacı Childrens Hospital, Ankara, Turkey
Derya Duman
Affiliation:
Department of Pediatric Cardiology, Hacettepe University Faculty of Medicine, Ihsan Doğramacı Childrens Hospital, Ankara, Turkey
Ebru Aypar
Affiliation:
Department of Pediatric Cardiology, Hacettepe University Faculty of Medicine, Ihsan Doğramacı Childrens Hospital, Ankara, Turkey
Süheyla Özkutlu
Affiliation:
Department of Pediatric Cardiology, Hacettepe University Faculty of Medicine, Ihsan Doğramacı Childrens Hospital, Ankara, Turkey
Dursun Alehan
Affiliation:
Department of Pediatric Cardiology, Hacettepe University Faculty of Medicine, Ihsan Doğramacı Childrens Hospital, Ankara, Turkey
Tevfik Karagöz
Affiliation:
Department of Pediatric Cardiology, Hacettepe University Faculty of Medicine, Ihsan Doğramacı Childrens Hospital, Ankara, Turkey
*
Correspondence to: K. Sel, MD, Department of Pediatric Cardiology, Hacettepe University Faculty of Medicine, Ihsan Doğramacı Childrens Hospital, 06100, Samanpazari, Ankara, Turkey. Tel: +90 312 3051157; Fax: +90 312 3090220; E-mail: [email protected]

Abstract

The patent foramen ovale is almost a normal anatomical hole between the atria with ~30% incidence in the general population. It has been suggested that the patent foramen ovale is the cause of some neurological events, which is explained by paradoxical embolism. Transcatheter closure of the patent foramen ovale is a common procedure in adult patients with cerebral ischaemic events, but there are limited data investigating the results in children. Between January, 2005 and February, 2014, 17 patients’ patent foramen ovales were closed by the transcatheter approach in our department. The indications for closure were transient ischaemic attack in 10 patients, stroke in four patients, and migraine in three patients. The mean age and mean weight at the time of the procedure were 11.1±3.7 years and 42.1±15.4 kg, respectively. We asked our patients whether their previous ailments continued. All patients responded to the study survey. In 15 patients, ailments did not continue after patent foramen ovale closure and they significantly decreased in two of them. We suggest that under the right conditions device closure of the patent foramen ovale is a safe solution for these cryptogenic ischaemic events and migraine.

Type
Original Articles
Copyright
© Cambridge University Press 2017 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Hagen, PT, Scholz, DG, Edwards, WD. Incidence and size of patent foramen ovale during the first 10 decades of life: an autopsy study of 965 normal hearts. Mayo Clin Proc 1984; 59: 1720.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
2. Kenny, D, Turner, M, Martin, R. When to close a patent foramen ovale. Arch Dis Child 2008; 93: 255259.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
3. Lechat, P, Mas, JL, Lascault, G, et al. Prevalence of patent foramen ovale in patients with stroke. N Engl J Med 1988; 318: 11481152.Google Scholar
4. Webster, MW, Chancellor, AM, Smith, HJ, et al. Patent foramen ovale in young stroke patients. Lancet 1988; 2: 1112.Google Scholar
5. Del Sette, M, Angeli, S, Leandri, M, et al. Migraine with aura and right-to-left shunt on transcranial Doppler: a case-control study. Cerebrovasc Dis 1998; 8: 327330.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
6. McCandless, RT, Arrington, CB, Nielsen, DC, Bale, JF Jr, Minich, LL. Patent foramen ovale in children with migraine headaches. J Pediatr 2011; 159: 243247.Google Scholar
7. Choi, DY, Shin, DH, Cho, KH, Lee, SP, Park, S. Migraine with aura: a predictor of patent foramen ovale in children and adolescents. Cephalalgia 2013; 33: 463468.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
8. Perkovič-Benedik, M, Zaletel, M, Pečarič-Meglič, N, Podnar, T. A right-to-left shunt and prothrombotic disorders in pediatric patients presenting with transient ischemic attack. Eur J Pediatr 2013; 172: 239245.Google Scholar
9. Agnetti, A, Carano, N, Sani, E, et al. Cryptogenic stroke in children: possible role of patent foramen ovale. Neuropediatrics 2006; 37: 5356.Google Scholar
10. Benedik, MP, Zaletel, M, Meglic, NP, Podnar, T. A right-to-left shunt in children with arterial ischaemic stroke. Arch Dis Child 2011; 96: 461467.Google Scholar
11. Cujec, B, Mainra, R, Johnson, DH. Prevention of recurrent cerebral ischemic events in patients with patent foramen ovale and cryptogenic strokes or transient ischemic attacks. Can J Cardiol 1999; 15: 5764.Google Scholar
12. Orgera, MA, O’Malley, PG, Taylor, AJ. Secondary prevention of cerebral ischemia in patent foramen ovale: systematic review and meta-analysis. South Med J 2001; 94: 699703.Google Scholar
13. Butera, G, Bini, MR, Chessa, M, Bedogni, F, Onofri, M, Carminati, M. Transcatheter closure of patent foramen ovale in patients with cryptogenic stroke. Ital Heart J 2001; 2: 115118.Google Scholar
14. Schwerzmann, M, Wiher, S, Nedeltchev, K, et al. Percutaneous closure of patent foramen ovale reduces the frequency of migraine attacks. Neurology 2004; 62: 13991401.Google Scholar
15. Davis, D, Gregson, J, Willeit, P, Stephan, B, Al-Shahi Salman, R, Brayne, C. Patent foramen ovale, ischemic stroke and migraine: systematic review and stratified meta-analysis of association studies. Neuroepidemiology 2013; 40: 5667.Google Scholar
16. Garg, P, Servoss, SJ, Wu, JC, et al. Lack of association between migraine headache and patent foramen ovale: results of a case-control study. Circulation 2010; 121: 14061412.Google Scholar
17. Bartz, PJ, Cetta, F, Cabalka, AK, et al. Paradoxical emboli in children and young adults: role of atrial septal defect and patent foramen ovaledevice closure. Mayo Clin Proc 2006; 81: 615618.Google Scholar
18. Menon, SC, Grove, A, McFadden, M, Korgenski, KE, Cowley, CG. Clinical practice, resource utilization, and outcomes of device closure of patent foramen ovale in pediatrics. Pediatr Neurol 2014; 50: 213217.Google Scholar