Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-7cvxr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-18T20:14:04.141Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Tissue motion annular displacement of the mitral valve using two-dimensional speckle tracking echocardiography predicts the left ventricular ejection fraction in normal children

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 June 2013

David E Black*
Affiliation:
Institute of Developmental Sciences, Human Development and Health Academic Unit, University of Southampton, Southampton, United Kingdom Pediatric Cardiology and Cardiothoracic Radiology, University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, Southampton, United Kingdom
Jen Bryant
Affiliation:
Institute of Developmental Sciences, Human Development and Health Academic Unit, University of Southampton, Southampton, United Kingdom MRC Lifecourse Epidemiology Unit, NIHR Southampton Biomedical Research Centre, University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, Southampton, United Kingdom
Charles Peebles
Affiliation:
Pediatric Cardiology and Cardiothoracic Radiology, University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, Southampton, United Kingdom
Keith M Godfrey
Affiliation:
Institute of Developmental Sciences, Human Development and Health Academic Unit, University of Southampton, Southampton, United Kingdom MRC Lifecourse Epidemiology Unit, NIHR Southampton Biomedical Research Centre, University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, Southampton, United Kingdom
Mark Hanson
Affiliation:
Institute of Developmental Sciences, Human Development and Health Academic Unit, University of Southampton, Southampton, United Kingdom MRC Lifecourse Epidemiology Unit, NIHR Southampton Biomedical Research Centre, University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, Southampton, United Kingdom
Joseph J Vettukattil
Affiliation:
Pediatric Cardiology and Cardiothoracic Radiology, University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, Southampton, United Kingdom
*
Correspondence to: Dr D. E. Black, MBBCh, MRCPCH, FCP, University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, Tremona Road, Southampton SO166YD, United Kingdom. Tel: 07548322088; Fax: 02380798419; E-mail: [email protected]

Abstract

Background: The gold standard for determining the left ventricular ejection fraction is cardiac magnetic resonance imaging. Other parameters for determining the ejection fraction such as M-mode echocardiography are operator-dependant and often inaccurate. Assessment of the displacement of the mitral valve annulus using two-dimensional speckle tracking echocardiography may provide an accurate and simple method of determining the left ventricular ejection fraction in children. Method: We retrospectively studied 70 healthy 9-year-old children with no history of cardiovascular disease who had been assessed using cardiac magnetic resonance imaging and two-dimensional transthoracic echocardiography. Mitral displacement was determined using the tissue motion annular displacement (TMAD) feature of Philips QLAB version 9. The midpoint displacement of the mitral valve was calculated, and the predicted left ventricular ejection fraction was compared with magnetic resonance imaging-derived and M-mode-derived ejection fractions. Results: The mean ejection fraction derived from magnetic resonance imaging (64.5 (4.6)) was similar to that derived from the TMAD midpoint (60.9 (2.7), p = 0.001) and the M-mode (61.9 (7), p = 0.012). The TMAD midpoint correlated strongly with the magnetic resonance imaging-derived ejection fraction (r = 0.69, p < 0.001), as did the predicted fraction (r = 0.67, p < 0.001). The M-mode ejection fraction showed a poor linear correlation with both magnetic resonance imaging-derived and TMAD-derived fractions (r = 0.33 and 0.04, respectively). Conclusion: TMAD of the mitral valve is a simple, effective, and highly reproducible method of assessing the ejection fraction in normal children. It shows a strong linear correlation with magnetic resonance imaging-derived ejection fraction and is superior to M-mode-derived ejection fractions.

Type
Original Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2013 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Gutgesell, HP. Echocardiographic assessment of cardiac function in infants and children. J Am Coll Cardiol 1985; 5 (1 Suppl): 95S103S.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
2. Mor-Avi, V, Lang, RM, Badano, LP, et al. Current and evolving echocardiographic techniques for the quantitative evaluation of cardiac mechanics: ASE/EAE consensus statement on methodology and indications endorsed by the Japanese Society of Echocardiography. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 2011; 24: 277313.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
3. Geyer, H, Caracciolo, G, Abe, H, et al. Assessment of myocardial mechanics using speckle tracking echocardiography: fundamentals and clinical applications. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 2010; 23: 351369; quiz 453–455.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
4. DeCara, JM, Toledo, E, Salgo, IS, Lammertin, G, Weinert, L, Lang, RM. Evaluation of left ventricular systolic function using automated angle-independent motion tracking of mitral annular displacement. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 2005; 18: 12661269.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
5. Tsang, W, Ahmad, H, Patel, AR, et al. Rapid estimation of left ventricular function using echocardiographic speckle-tracking of mitral annular displacement. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 2010; 23: 511515.Google Scholar
6. Anderson, RH, Sanchez-Quintana, D, Niederer, P, Lunkenheimer, PP. Structural-functional correlates of the 3-dimensional arrangement of the myocytes making up the ventricular walls. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2008; 136: 1018.Google Scholar
7. Henein, MY, Gibson, DG. Long axis function in disease. Heart 1999; 81: 229231.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
8. Henein, MY, Gibson, DG. Normal long axis function. Heart 1999; 81: 111113.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
9. Donal, E, Coquerel, N, Bodi, S, et al. Importance of ventricular longitudinal function in chronic heart failure. Eur J Echocardiogr 2011; 12: 619627.Google Scholar
10. Sanchez-Quintana, D, Garcia-Martinez, V, Climent, V, Hurle, JM. Morphological changes in the normal pattern of ventricular myoarchitecture in the developing human heart. Anat Rec 1995; 243: 483495.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
11. Inskip, HM, Godfrey, KM, Robinson, SM, Law, CM, Barker, DJ, Cooper, C. Cohort profile: The Southampton Women's Survey. Int J Epidemiol 2006; 35: 4248.Google Scholar
12. Bryant, JGK, Hanson, MA, Barton, S, Peebles, C. Cardiovascular magnetic resonance: interstudy reproducibility of measurements of left ventricular function in children. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson 2011; 13 (1 Suppl): 359.Google Scholar
13. Nevo, ST, van Stralen, M, Vossepoel, AM, et al. Automated tracking of the mitral valve annulus motion in apical echocardiographic images using multidimensional dynamic programming. Ultrasound in Medicine and Biology 2007; 33: 13891399.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
14. Yamada, H, Oki, T, Tabata, T, Iuchi, A, Ito, S. Assessment of left ventricular systolic wall motion velocity with pulsed tissue Doppler imaging: comparison with peak dP/dt of the left ventricular pressure curve. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 1998; 11: 442449.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
15. Haruki, N, Takeuchi, M, Gerard, O, et al. Accuracy of measuring mitral annular velocity by 2D speckle tracking imaging. J Cardiol 2009; 53: 188195.Google Scholar
16. Roberson, DA, Cui, W. Tissue Doppler imaging measurement of left ventricular systolic function in children: mitral annular displacement index is superior to peak velocity. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 2009; 22: 376382.Google Scholar
17. Nasiraei-Moghaddam, A, Gharib, M. Evidence for the existence of a functional helical myocardial band. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol 2009; 296: H127H131.Google Scholar
18. Buckberg, GD. Basic science review: the helix and the heart. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2002; 124: 863883.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
19. Notomi, Y, Srinath, G, Shiota, T, et al. Maturational and adaptive modulation of left ventricular torsional biomechanics: Doppler tissue imaging observation from infancy to adulthood. Circulation 2006; 113: 25342541.Google Scholar
20. Anderson, RH, Ho, SY, Redmann, K, Sanchez-Quintana, D, Lunkenheimer, PP. The anatomical arrangement of the myocardial cells making up the ventricular mass. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2005; 28: 517525.Google Scholar
21. Greenbaum, RA, Ho, SY, Gibson, DG, Becker, AE, Anderson, RH. Left ventricular fibre architecture in man. Br Heart J 1981; 45: 248263.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
22. Buckberg, G, Hoffman, JI, Mahajan, A, Saleh, S, Coghlan, C. Cardiac mechanics revisited: the relationship of cardiac architecture to ventricular function. Circulation 2008; 118: 25712587.Google Scholar
23. Sengupta, PP, Korinek, J, Belohlavek, M, et al. Left ventricular structure and function: basic science for cardiac imaging. J Am Coll Cardiol 2006; 48: 19882001.Google Scholar
24. Ho, SY. Anatomy and myoarchitecture of the left ventricular wall in normal and in disease. Eur J Echocardiogr 2009; 10: iii3iii7.Google Scholar
25. Wulfsohn, D, Nyengaard, JR, Tang, Y. Postnatal growth of cardiomyocytes in the left ventricle of the rat. Anat Rec A Discov Mol Cell Evol Biol 2004; 277: 236247.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
26. Marcus, KA, Mavinkurve-Groothuis, AM, Barends, M, et al. Reference values for myocardial two-dimensional strain echocardiography in a healthy pediatric and young adult cohort. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 2011; 24: 625636.Google Scholar
27. Ahmad, H, Mor-Avi, V, Lang, RM, et al. Assessment of right ventricular function using echocardiographic speckle tracking of the tricuspid annular motion: comparison with cardiac magnetic resonance. Echocardiography 2012; 29: 1924.Google Scholar
28. Friedberg, MK, Mertens, L. Tissue velocities, strain, and strain rate for echocardiographic assessment of ventricular function in congenital heart disease. Eur J Echocardiogr 2009; 10: 585593.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
29. Mertens, L, Friedberg, MK. The gold standard for noninvasive imaging in congenital heart disease: echocardiography. Current Opinion in Cardiology 2009; 24: 119124.Google Scholar