Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t8hqh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-01T00:26:20.307Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Results of balloon dilatation of stenotic homografts in pulmonary position in children and young adults

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  07 March 2012

Robin A. Bertels ,
Michiel Dalinghaus ,
Maarten Witsenburg ,
Aagje Nijveld ,
Ad J. J. C. Bogers ,
Folkert Meijboom ,
Anton van Oort  and
Ronald Tanke
Robin A. Bertels*
Affiliation:
Department of Pediatric Cardiology, Institution of Data Collection, Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
Michiel Dalinghaus
Affiliation:
Department of Pediatric Cardiology, Institution of Data Collection, Erasmus Medical Center – Sophia Children's Hospital, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
Maarten Witsenburg
Affiliation:
Department of Pediatric Cardiology, Institution of Data Collection, Erasmus Medical Center – Sophia Children's Hospital, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
Aagje Nijveld
Affiliation:
Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
Ad J. J. C. Bogers
Affiliation:
Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
Folkert Meijboom
Affiliation:
Department of Pediatric Cardiology, Institution of Data Collection, Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
Anton van Oort
Affiliation:
Department of Pediatric Cardiology, Institution of Data Collection, Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
Ronald Tanke
Affiliation:
Department of Pediatric Cardiology, Institution of Data Collection, Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
*
Correspondence to: Dr R. A. Bertels, MD, Department of Pediatric Cardiology, Leiden University Medical Center, Albinusdreef 2, P.O. Box 9600, 2300 RC Leiden, The Netherlands. Tel: +31 715262835; Fax: +31 715248110; E-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Objectives

To evaluate the results of balloon dilatation of stenotic homografts in children, adolescents, and young adults and to identify factors that might influence or predict the effect of the dilatation.

Background

Homografts are widely used in congenital cardiac surgery; however, the longevity remains a problem mostly because of stenosis in the homograft. The effect of treatment by balloon dilatation is unclear.

Methods

In a retrospective study, the effect of balloon dilatation was determined by the percentage of reduction of the peak systolic pressure gradient over the homograft during catheterisation and the postponement of re-intervention or replacement of the homograft in months. Successful dilatations – defined in this study as a reduction of more than 33% and postponement of more than 18 months – were compared with unsuccessful dilatations in search of factors influencing or predicting the results.

Results

The mean reduction of the peak systolic pressure gradient was 30% in 40 procedures. Re-intervention or replacement of the homograft was postponed by a mean of 19 months. In all, 14 balloon dilatations (35%) were successful; the mean reduction was 49% and the mean postponement was 34 months. The time since homograft implantation, the presence of calcification, the homograft/balloon ratio, and the pressure applied during dilatation all tended to correlate with outcome, but were not statistically significant.

Conclusions

Balloon dilatation is able to reduce the peak systolic pressure gradient over homografts in a subgroup of patients and can be of clinical significance to postpone re-intervention or pulmonary valve replacement.

Keywords

Congenital heart defectshomologous transplantationvalvuloplastytreatment outcome
Type
Original Article
Information
Cardiology in the Young , Volume 22 , Issue 5 , 13 September 2012 , pp. 589 - 595
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2012

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

†

Currently employed: Department of Pediatric Cardiology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands.

‡

Currently employed: Department of Pediatric Cardiology, Wilhelmina Children's Hospital, University Medical Center, Utrecht, The Netherlands.

References

1.Perron, J, Moran, AM, Gauvreau, K, del Nido, PJ, Mayer, JE Jr, Jonas, RA. Valved homograft conduit repair of the right heart in early infancy. Ann Thorac Surg 1999; 68: 542–548.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
2.Powell, AJ, Lock, JE, Keane, JF, Perry, SB. Prolongation of RV-PA conduit life span by percutaneous stent implantation. Intermediate-term results. Circulation 1995; 92: 3282–3288.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
3.Tatebe, S, Nagakura, S, Boyle, EM Jr, Duncan, BW. Right ventricle to pulmonary artery reconstruction using a valved homograft. Circ J 2003; 67: 906–912.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
4.Oosterhof, T, Meijboom, FJ, Vliegen, HW, et al. . Long-term follow-up of homograft function after pulmonary valve replacement in patients with tetralogy of Fallot. Eur Heart J 2006; 27: 1478–1484.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
5.Hanley, FL. Management of the congenitally abnormal right ventricular outflow tract – what is the right approach? J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2000; 119: 1–3.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
6.Yuan, SM, Mishaly, D, Shinfeld, A, Raanani, E. Right ventricular outflow tract reconstruction: valved conduit of choice and clinical outcomes. J Cardiovasc Med (Hagerstown) 2008; 9: 327–337.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
7.Bohm, JO. Is the Ross operation still an acceptable option in children and adolescents? Ann Thorac Surg 2006; 82: 940–947.Google Scholar
8.Zeevi, B, Keane, JF, Perry, SB, Lock, JE. Balloon dilation of postoperative right ventricular outflow obstructions. J Am Coll Cardiol 1989; 14: 401–408.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
9.Nordmeyer, J, Coats, L, Bonhoeffer, P. Current experience with percutaneous pulmonary valve implantation. Semin Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2006; 18: 122–125.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
10.Sohn, S, Kashani, IA, Rothman, A. Partial and transient relief of conduit obstruction by low-pressure balloon dilation in patients with congenital heart disease. Cathet Cardiovasc Diagn 1995; 34: 35–40.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
11.Waldman, JD, Schoen, FJ, Kirkpatrick, SE, Mathewson, JW, George, L, Lamberti, JJ. Balloon dilatation of porcine bioprosthetic valves in the pulmonary position. Circulation 1987; 76: 109–114.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
12.Sanatani, S, Potts, JE, Human, DG, Sandor, GG, Patterson, MW, Gordon Culham, JA. Balloon angioplasty of right ventricular outflow tract conduits. Pediatr Cardiol 2001; 22: 228–232.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
13.Lloyd, TR, Marvin, WJ Jr, Mahoney, LT, Lauer, RM. Balloon dilation valvuloplasty of bioprosthetic valves in extracardiac conduits. Am Heart J 1987; 114: 268–274.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
14.Sreeram, N, Hutter, P, Silove, E. Sustained high pressure double balloon angioplasty of calcified conduits. Heart 1999; 81: 162–165.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
15.Aggarwal, S, Garekar, S, Forbes, TJ, Turner, DR. Is stent placement effective for palliation of right ventricle to pulmonary artery conduit stenosis? J Am Coll Cardiol 2007; 49: 480–484.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
16.Peng, LF, McElhinney, DB, Nugent, AW, et al. . Endovascular stenting of obstructed right ventricle-to-pulmonary artery conduits: a 15-year experience. Circulation 2006; 113: 2598–2605.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
17.Nordmeyer, J, Coats, L, Lurz, P, et al. . Percutaneous pulmonary valve-in-valve implantation: a successful treatment concept for early device failure. Eur Heart J 2008; 29: 810–815.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
18.Lurz, P, Bonhoeffer, P, Taylor, AM. Percutaneous pulmonary valve implantation: an update. Expert Rev Cardiovasc Ther 2009; 7: 823–833.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
19.Bokenkamp, R, Hazekamp, MG, Schalij, MJ, Clur, SA, Ottenkamp, J, Blom, NA. Percutaneous implantation of a pulmonary valve in 3 children with surgically corrected cardiac anomalies. Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd 2007; 151: 2580–2585.Google ScholarPubMed
20.Boudjemline, Y, Laborde, F, Pineau, E, et al. . Expandable right ventricular-to-pulmonary artery conduit: an animal study. Pediatr Res 2006; 59: 773–777.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
21.Clur, SA, Baan, J, Lurz, P, Bonhoeffer, P, Ottenkamp, J. Percutaneous implantation of a pulmonary valve: an illustrative case. Neth Heart J 2007; 15: 27–30.Google ScholarPubMed
22.Helbing, WA, Bosch, HG, Maliepaard, C, et al. . Comparison of echocardiographic methods with magnetic resonance imaging for assessment of right ventricular function in children. Am J Cardiol 1995; 76: 589–594.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed