Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-d8cs5 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-02-05T16:52:04.981Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Predictive utility of cardiac index-systemic vascular resistance plot and perfusion pressure in late post-Fontan patients

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 February 2025

Yuki Kawasaki*
Affiliation:
Division of Cardiology, Children’s Hospital of Michigan, Carman and Ann Adams Department of Pediatrics, Wayne State University School of Medicine, St Louis, MO, USA
Takeshi Sasaki
Affiliation:
Division of Cardiology, Children’s Hospital of Michigan, Carman and Ann Adams Department of Pediatrics, Wayne State University School of Medicine, St Louis, MO, USA
Daisuke Kobayashi
Affiliation:
Division of Cardiology, Children’s Hospital of Michigan, Carman and Ann Adams Department of Pediatrics, Wayne State University School of Medicine, St Louis, MO, USA
*
Corresponding author: Yuki Kawasaki; Email: [email protected]

Abstract

Introduction:

Cases of Fontan failure with normal Fontan pressure have been reported. This study aimed to identify catheterisation-derived haemodynamic predictors of heart transplantation/death, other than Fontan pressure, in late post-Fontan patients.

Methods:

This retrospective study evaluated post-Fontan patients who underwent cardiac catheterisation at age ≥10 years between 1993 and 2018. The predictive effect of cardiac index-systemic vascular resistance index plot and perfusion pressure on freedom from the primary outcome (heart transplantation/death) was evaluated. Patients were categorised into haemodynamic categories A (cardiac index ≥ 3, systemic vascular resistance index ≥ 13), B (cardiac index < 3, systemic vascular resistance index ≥ 13), C (cardiac index ≥ 3, systemic vascular resistance index < 13), and D (cardiac index < 3, systemic vascular resistance index < 13).

Results:

In total, 79 patients (median age: 15.7 [range: 10.1–50.2] years) were included; of them, the primary endpoint occurred in 10 (13%; median follow-up: 1.9 [range: 0.1–18.8] years). Category C patients had significantly shorter freedom from the endpoint than categories A and B patients. Univariate analysis identified significant haemodynamic predictors, including Fontan pressure, pulmonary/systemic vascular resistance index, pulmonary/systemic flow, systemic arterial oxygen saturation, systemic venous oxygen saturation, systemic vascular resistance index, perfusion pressure, perfusion pressure < 53 mmHg, and category C. In multivariable analysis, perfusion pressure < 53 mmHg and category C emerged as predictors of heart transplantation/death alongside Fontan pressure.

Conclusion:

Haemodynamic profiling of late post-Fontan patients using the cardiac index-systemic vascular resistance index plot can aid to comprehend the post-Fontan status and predict clinical prognosis.

Type
Original Article
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2025. Published by Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Pundi, KN, Johnson, JN, Dearani, JA, et al. 40-year follow-up after the Fontan operation: long-term outcomes of 1,052 patients. J Am Coll Cardiol 2015; 66: 17001710.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ohuchi, H. Adult patients with Fontan circulation: what we know and how to manage adults with Fontan circulation? J Cardiol 2016; 68: 181189.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ohuchi, H, Miyazaki, A, Negishi, J, et al. Hemodynamic determinants of mortality after Fontan operation. Am Heart J 2017; 189: 918.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Miranda, WR, Borlaug, BA, Hagler, DJ, Connolly, HM, Egbe, AC. Haemodynamic profiles in adult Fontan patients: associated haemodynamics and prognosis. Eur J Heart Fail 2019; 21: 803809.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Book, WM, Gerardin, J, Saraf, A, Marie Valente, A, Rodriguez, F 3rd.Clinical phenotypes of Fontan failure: implications for management. Congenit Heart Dis 2016; 11: 296308.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Inai, K, Inuzuka, R, Ono, H, et al. Predictors of long-term mortality among perioperative survivors of Fontan operation. Eur Heart J 2022; 43: 23732384.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ohuchi, H, Yasuda, K, Miyazaki, A, et al. Haemodynamic characteristics before and after the onset of protein losing enteropathy in patients after the Fontan operation. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2013; 43: e49e57.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hebson, CL, McCabe, NM, Elder, RW, et al. Hemodynamic phenotype of the failing Fontan in an adult population. Am J Cardiol 2013; 112: 19431947.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kawasaki, Y, Sasaki, T, Kobayashi, D. Hemodynamic profiling using a cardiac index-systemic vascular resistance plot in patients with Fontan circulation. Congenit Heart Dis 2023; 18: 431445.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
LaFarge, CG, Miettinen, OS. The estimation of oxygen consumption. Cardiovasc Res 1970; 4: 2330.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kanda, Y. Investigation of the freely available easy-to-use software ‘EZR’ for medical statistics. Bone Marrow Transplant 2013; 48: 452458.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
John, AS, Johnson, JA, Khan, M, Driscoll, DJ, Warnes, CA, Cetta, F. Clinical outcomes and improved survival in patients with protein-losing enteropathy after the Fontan operation. J Am Coll Cardiol 2014; 64: 5462.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kawasaki, Y, Sasaki, T, Forbes, TJ, Ross, RD, Kobayashi, D. Optimal criteria for transcatheter closure of Fontan fenestration: a single-center experience with a review of literature. Heart Vessels 2021; 36: 12461255.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Alsaied, T, Bokma, JP, Engel, ME, et al. Factors associated with long-term mortality after Fontan procedures: a systematic review. Heart 2017; 103: 104110.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Saito, S, Uchino, S, Takinami, M, Uezono, S, Bellomo, R. Postoperative blood pressure deficit and acute kidney injury progression in vasopressor-dependent cardiovascular surgery patients. Crit Care 2016; 20: 74.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ohuchi, H, Negishi, J, Hayama, Y, Miyazaki, A, Shiraishi, I, Ichikawa, H. Renal resistive index reflects Fontan pathophysiology and predicts mortality. Heart 2017; 103: 16311637.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Barracano, R, Merola, A, Fusco, F, Scognamiglio, G, Sarubbi, B. Protein-losing enteropathy in Fontan circulation: pathophysiology, outcome and treatment options of a complex condition. Int J Cardiol Congenit Heart Dis 2022; 7: 100322.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Saiki, H, Kuwata, S, Iwamoto, Y, et al. Fenestration in the Fontan circulation as a strategy for chronic cardioprotection. Heart 2019; 105: 12661272.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Poh, CL, d’Udekem, Y. Life after surviving Fontan surgery: a meta-analysis of the incidence and predictors of late death. Heart Lung Circ 2018; 27: 552559.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Egbe, AC, Connolly, HM, Miranda, WR, et al. Hemodynamics of Fontan failure: the role of pulmonary vascular disease. Circ Heart Fail 2017; 10: e004515.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Waypa, GB, Schumacker, PT. Hypoxia-induced changes in pulmonary and systemic vascular resistance: where is the O2 sensor? Respir Physiol Neurobiol 2010; 174: 201211.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Møller, S, Bendtsen, F. The pathophysiology of arterial vasodilatation and hyperdynamic circulation in cirrhosis. Liver Int 2018; 38: 570580.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nagata, H, Sakamoto, I, Fukuoka, S, et al. Portosystemic venous shunt in the patients with Fontan circulation. Heart Vessels 2021; 36: 285290.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miike, H, Ohuchi, H, Hayama, Y, et al. Systemic artery vasoconstrictor therapy in Fontan patients with high cardiac output-heart failure: a single-center experience. Pediatr Cardiol 2021; 42: 700706.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Supplementary material: File

Kawasaki et al. supplementary material 1

Kawasaki et al. supplementary material
Download Kawasaki et al. supplementary material 1(File)
File 644.5 KB
Supplementary material: File

Kawasaki et al. supplementary material 2

Kawasaki et al. supplementary material
Download Kawasaki et al. supplementary material 2(File)
File 27.3 KB
Supplementary material: File

Kawasaki et al. supplementary material 3

Kawasaki et al. supplementary material
Download Kawasaki et al. supplementary material 3(File)
File 19.5 KB
Supplementary material: File

Kawasaki et al. supplementary material 4

Kawasaki et al. supplementary material
Download Kawasaki et al. supplementary material 4(File)
File 19.4 KB
Supplementary material: File

Kawasaki et al. supplementary material 5

Kawasaki et al. supplementary material
Download Kawasaki et al. supplementary material 5(File)
File 20.1 KB
Supplementary material: File

Kawasaki et al. supplementary material 6

Kawasaki et al. supplementary material
Download Kawasaki et al. supplementary material 6(File)
File 20.1 KB
Supplementary material: File

Kawasaki et al. supplementary material 7

Kawasaki et al. supplementary material
Download Kawasaki et al. supplementary material 7(File)
File 20.1 KB