No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
Lost but not missing: factors associated with loss of follow-up in a paediatric cardiology clinic
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 02 September 2021
Abstract
Background:
Loss of follow-up is a barrier to providing adequate care to paediatric cardiac patients. The purpose of this study was to determine variables associated with loss of appropriate paediatric cardiology follow-up, including potentially modifiable factors. We hypothesised having earlier recommend follow-up intervals was associated with less likelihood of loss of follow-up.
Methods:
We performed a retrospective cohort study of patients >5 years old seen in a large, outpatient paediatric practice from 2013 to 2016. Subjects were considered to be lost to follow-up if they did not have a subsequent outpatient encounter by 6 months after their recommend follow-up time interval.
Results:
Of the 8940 eligible patients, 45.9% were lost to follow-up. Recommended follow-up interval of 1 year was associated with less loss of follow-up (41.4%) as compared to 2-year intervals (51.6%) and 3 years (55.7%) (p < 0.001 for both). Other significant predictors of loss of follow-up included less severe heart disease, older age, and non-Hispanic Black race/ethnicity. Sex and payor type were not significant predictors. In the stratified analyses by severity of disease and age, longer recommended follow-up time was associated with greater loss of follow-up among all severity and age categories.
Conclusions:
Almost half of the patients in our cohort did not return to clinic within the recommended timeline. Shorter follow-up time was associated with less loss of follow-up among all categories of disease severity and age groups. Recommending shorter follow-up intervals may be one initiative for paediatric cardiologists to improve rates of follow-up.
- Type
- Original Article
- Information
- Copyright
- © The Author(s), 2021. Published by Cambridge University Press
References
Stout, KK, Daniels, CJ, Aboulhosn, JA, et al. 2018 AHA/ACC guideline for the management of adults with congenital heart disease: executive summary: a report of the american college of Cardiology/American heart association task force on clinical practice guidelines. Circulation 2019; 139: e637–e97.Google Scholar
Mylotte, D, Pilote, L, Ionescu-Ittu, R, et al. Specialized adult congenital heart disease care: the impact of policy on mortality. Circulation 2014; 129: 1804–1812.10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.113.005817CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mackie, AS, Ionescu-Ittu, R, Therrien, J, Pilote, L, Abrahamowicz, M, Marelli, AJ. Children and adults with congenital heart disease lost to follow-up: who and when? Circulation 2009; 120: 302–309.10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.108.839464CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mackie, AS, Rempel, GR, Rankin, KN, Nicholas, D, Magill-Evans, J. Risk factors for loss to follow-up among children and young adults with congenital heart disease. Cardiol Young 2012; 22: 307–315.10.1017/S104795111100148XCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gurvitz, M, Valente, AM, Broberg, C, et al. Prevalence and predictors of gaps in care among adult congenital heart disease patients: HEART-ACHD (The Health Education, and Access Research Trial). J Am Coll Cardiol 2013; 61: 2180–2184.10.1016/j.jacc.2013.02.048CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wacker, A, Kaemmerer, H, Hollweck, R, et al. Outcome of operated and unoperated adults with congenital cardiac disease lost to follow-up for more than five years. Am J Cardiol 2005; 95: 776–779.10.1016/j.amjcard.2004.11.036CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sable, C, Foster, E, Uzark, K, et al. Best practices in managing transition to adulthood for adolescents with congenital heart disease: the transition process and medical and psychosocial issues: a scientific statement from the American Heart Association. Circulation 2011; 123: 1454–1485.10.1161/CIR.0b013e3182107c56CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Buchbinder, D, Brazauskas, R, Bo-Subait, K, et al. Predictors of loss to Follow-Up among pediatric and adult hematopoietic cell transplantation survivors: a report from the center for international blood and marrow transplant research. Biol Blood Marrow Transp 2020; 26: 553–561.10.1016/j.bbmt.2019.11.003CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Atger-Lallier, L, Guilmin-Crepon, S, Boizeau, P, et al. Factors affecting loss to Follow-Up in children and adolescents with chronic endocrine conditions. Horm Res Paediatr 2019; 92: 254–261.10.1159/000505517CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Shoemaker, A, Cheng, P, Gal, RL, et al. Predictors of loss to follow-up among children with type 2 diabetes. Horm Res Paediatr 2017; 87: 377–384.10.1159/000475595CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kariminia, A, Law, M, Davies, MA, et al. Mortality and losses to follow-up among adolescents living with HIV in the IeDEA global cohort collaboration. J Int AIDS Soc 2018; 21: e25215.10.1002/jia2.25215CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wernovsky, G, Rome, JJ, Tabbutt, S, et al. Guidelines for the outpatient management of complex congenital heart disease. Congenit Heart Dis 2006; 1: 10–26.10.1111/j.1747-0803.2006.00002.xCrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Friedman, KG, Rathod, RH, Farias, M, et al. Resource utilization after introduction of a standardized clinical assessment and management plan. Congenit Heart Dis 2010; 5: 374–381.10.1111/j.1747-0803.2010.00434.xCrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gerardin, JF, Menk, JS, Pyles, LA, Martin, CM, Lohr, JL. Compliance with adult congenital heart disease guidelines: are we following the recommendations? Congenit Heart Dis 2016; 11: 245–253.10.1111/chd.12309CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gregorcyk et al. supplementary material
Gregorcyk et al. supplementary material
File
19.3 KB