Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rcrh6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T05:57:30.105Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The hybrid procedure for the borderline left ventricle

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 November 2010

Christopher K. Davis*
Affiliation:
Division of Cardiology, University of California, San Diego, California, United States of America Rady Children’s Hospital San Diego, University of California, San Diego, California, United States of America
Peter Pastuszko
Affiliation:
Division of Cardiovascular Surgery, University of California, San Diego, California, United States of America Rady Children’s Hospital San Diego, University of California, San Diego, California, United States of America
John Lamberti
Affiliation:
Division of Cardiovascular Surgery, University of California, San Diego, California, United States of America Rady Children’s Hospital San Diego, University of California, San Diego, California, United States of America
John Moore
Affiliation:
Division of Cardiology, University of California, San Diego, California, United States of America Rady Children’s Hospital San Diego, University of California, San Diego, California, United States of America
Frank Hanley
Affiliation:
Division of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Lucile Packard Children’s Hospital, Stanford University, San Diego, California, United States of America
Howaida El Said
Affiliation:
Division of Cardiology, University of California, San Diego, California, United States of America Rady Children’s Hospital San Diego, University of California, San Diego, California, United States of America
*
Correspondence to: C. K. Davis, MD, PhD, 3020 Children’s Way MC5004, San Diego, California 92122, United States of America. Tel: 858 966 5855; Fax: 858 571 7903; E-mail: [email protected]

Abstract

Introduction

In patients with varying degrees of left heart hypoplasia, it is often difficult to determine whether the left heart structures are adequate in size to support biventricular circulation. Historically, the decision to pursue a single ventricle or biventricular repair needed to be made early and was often irreversible. The hybrid procedure may be a better initial approach for patients with borderline left ventricles.

Methods

We describe a series of four patients with various congenital cardiac malformations, all of whom had borderline left ventricles. Based on pre-operative echocardiograms, several scoring systems and left ventricle volumes were used to predict the optimal type of repair. A left ventricular volume of 20 millilitres per square metre was used as the minimum cut-off value for adequacy of biventricular repair.

Results

The left ventricular volumes for the patients were 17.1, 23.7, 25.4, and 25.8 millilitres per square metre. In none of the four patients were the calculations unanimous in the recommendation to pursue either type of repair. All patients underwent the hybrid procedure and then eventual single ventricle palliation (two patients) or biventricular repair (two patients). All survived with a mean follow-up of 18 plus or minus 3.9 months.

Conclusions

The hybrid procedure may be the best option in patients with a borderline left ventricle. It can serve as a bridge to a more definitive repair when patients are older, larger, and for whom the decision between single ventricle and biventricular repair can be more easily made.

Type
Original Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2010

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Rhodes, LA, Colan, S, Perry, S, Jonas, R, Sanders, S. Predictors of survival in neonates with critical aortic stenosis. Circulation 1991; 84: 23252335.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
2. Colan, S, McElhinney, D, Crawford, E, Keane, J, Lock, J. Validation and re-evaluation of a discriminant model predicting anatomic suitability for biventricular repair in neonates with aortic stenosis. J Am Coll Cardiol 2006; 47: 18581865.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
3. Hickey, E, Caldarone, C, Blackstone, E, et al. Critical left ventricular outflow obstruction: the disproportionate impact of biventricular repair in borderline cases. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2007; 134: 14291437.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
4. Tani, L, Minich, L, Pagotto, L, Shaddy, R, McGough, E, Hawkins, J. Left heart hypoplasia and neonatal aortic arch obstruction: is the rhodes left ventricular adequacy score applicable? J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1999; 118: 8186.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
5. Lofland, GK, McCrindle, B, Williams, W, et al. Critical aortic stenosis in the neonate: a multi-institutional study of management, outcomes, and risk factors. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2001; 121: 1027.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
6. Akinturk, H, Michel-Behnke, I, Valeske, K, et al. Hybrid transcatheter-surgical palliation – basis for univentricular or biventricular repair: the Giessen experience. Pediatr Cardiol 2007; 28: 7987.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
7. Pizarro, C, Bhat, M, Derby, C, Radtke, W. Bailout after failed bivetricular management of critical aortic stenosis: another application of the hybrid approach. Ann Thorac Surg 2009; 87: e40e42.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
8. Helak, J, Reichek, N. Quantification of human left ventricular mass and volume by 2-dimensional echocardiography: in vivo anatomic validation. Circulation 1981; 63: 13981407.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
9. Galantowicz, M, Cheatham, J. Lessons learned from the development of a new hybrid strategy for the management of hypoplastic left heart syndrome. Pediatr Cardiol 2005; 26: 190199.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed