Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-p9bg8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-18T19:03:03.587Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Foetal aortic valvuloplasty: experience of five cases

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 February 2013

Pablo Marantz ,
Horacio Aiello ,
Sofía Grinenco ,
Gustavo Izbizky ,
Gabriela Peña ,
Luis Trentacoste ,
Miguel Granja  and
Lucas Otaño
Pablo Marantz
Affiliation:
Fetal Medicine Unit, Hospital Italiano de Buenos Aires, Acassuso, Buenos Aires, Argentina Department of Pediatric Cardiology, Hospital Italiano de Buenos Aires, Acassuso, Buenos Aires, Argentina
Horacio Aiello
Affiliation:
Fetal Medicine Unit, Hospital Italiano de Buenos Aires, Acassuso, Buenos Aires, Argentina Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Hospital Italiano de Buenos Aires, Acassuso, Buenos Aires, Argentina
Sofía Grinenco*
Affiliation:
Fetal Medicine Unit, Hospital Italiano de Buenos Aires, Acassuso, Buenos Aires, Argentina Department of Pediatric Cardiology, Hospital Italiano de Buenos Aires, Acassuso, Buenos Aires, Argentina
Gustavo Izbizky
Affiliation:
Fetal Medicine Unit, Hospital Italiano de Buenos Aires, Acassuso, Buenos Aires, Argentina Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Hospital Italiano de Buenos Aires, Acassuso, Buenos Aires, Argentina
Gabriela Peña
Affiliation:
Department of Pediatric Cardiology, Hospital Italiano de Buenos Aires, Acassuso, Buenos Aires, Argentina
Luis Trentacoste
Affiliation:
Department of Pediatric Cardiology, Hospital Italiano de Buenos Aires, Acassuso, Buenos Aires, Argentina
Miguel Granja
Affiliation:
Department of Pediatric Cardiology, Hospital Italiano de Buenos Aires, Acassuso, Buenos Aires, Argentina
Lucas Otaño
Affiliation:
Fetal Medicine Unit, Hospital Italiano de Buenos Aires, Acassuso, Buenos Aires, Argentina Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Hospital Italiano de Buenos Aires, Acassuso, Buenos Aires, Argentina
*
Correspondence to: S. Grinenco, MD, Pediatric Cardiologist, Department of Pediatric Cardiology, Fetal Medicine Unit, Hospital Italiano de Buenos Aires, Juan Domingo Perón 4190 (C1181ACH), Buenos Aires, Argentina. Tel: +(5411) 4959-0200(8325); Fax: +(5411) 4959-0200(8325); E-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Objectives

Foetal aortic valvuloplasty has been proposed as a strategy to improve left heart growth and function in foetuses with severe aortic stenosis at risk of progression to hypoplastic left heart syndrome. We report our experience with this intervention.

Methods and results

Between 2005 and 2010, five foetuses with aortic stenosis and at risk of progression to hypoplastic left heart syndrome underwent ultrasound-guided percutaneous foetal aortic valvuloplasty. There were no associated maternal complications or foetal demise. In one case, the pregnancy was terminated a couple of weeks after the intervention, one foetus evolved to hypoplastic left heart syndrome, and three did not.

Conclusions

Foetal aortic valvuloplasty seems to be a safe and feasible procedure. It has been reported that it has the potential to prevent progression to hypoplastic left heart syndrome in selected foetuses with severe aortic stenosis. Further investigation regarding physiological and clinical aspects of this disease both prenatally and postnatally will probably allow to improve therapeutic strategies and clinical outcome.

Keywords

Balloon valvuloplastyaortic valve stenosishypoplastic left heart syndromefoetal ultrasonographyheart defectscongenitalfoetal heart
Type
Original Articles
Information
Cardiology in the Young , Volume 23 , Issue 5 , October 2013 , pp. 675 - 681
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2013 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Danford, DA, Cronican, P. Hypoplastic left heart syndrome: progression of left ventricular dilation and dysfunction to left ventricular hypoplasia in utero. Am Heart J 1992; 123: 1712–1713.Google Scholar
2. Simpson, JM, Sharland, GK. Natural history and outcome of aortic stenosis diagnosed prenatally. Heart 1997; 77: 205–210.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
3. Makikallio, K, Mc Elhinney, DB, Levine, JC, et al. Fetal aortic valve stenosis and the evolution of hypoplastic left heart syndrome: patient selection for fetal intervention. Circulation 2006; 113: 1401–1405.Google Scholar
4. Tweddell, JS, Hoffman, GM, Ghanayem, NS, Frommelt, MA, Mussatto, KA, Berger, S. Hypoplastic left heart syndrome. In: Allen HD, Driscoll DJ, Shaddy RE, Feltes TF (eds.). Moss and Adams’ Heart Disease in Infants, Children, and Adolescents: Including the Fetus and Young Adults, 7th edn. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Philadelphia, 2008, 1005–1007.Google Scholar
5. Mahle, WT, Spray, TL, Wernovsky, G, Gaynor, JW, Clark, BJ. Survival after reconstructive surgery for hypoplastic left heart syndrome: a 15-year experience from a single institution. Circulation 2000; 102 (19 Suppl 3): III136–141.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
6. Tweddell, JS, Hoffman, GM, Mussatto, KA, et al. Improved survival of patients undergoing palliation of hypoplastic left heart syndrome: lessons learned from 115 consecutive patients. Circulation 2002; 106 (12 Suppl 1): I82–189.Google Scholar
7. Rogers, BT, Msall, ME, Buck, GM, et al. Neurodevelopmental outcome of infants with hypoplastic left heart syndrome. J Pediatr 1995; 126: 496–498.Google Scholar
8. Mc Elhinney, DB, Benson, CB, Brown, DW, et al. Cerebral blood flow characteristics and biometry in fetuses undergoing prenatal intervention for aortic stenosis with evolving hypoplastic left heart syndrome. Ultrasound Med Biol 2010; 36: 29–37.Google Scholar
9. Tworetzky, W, Wilkins-Haug, L, Jennings, RW, et al. Balloon dilation of severe aortic stenosis in the fetus: potential for prevention of hypoplastic left heart syndrome: candidate selection, technique, and results of successful intervention. Circulation 2004; 110: 2125–2131.Google Scholar
10. Huhta, J, Quintero, RA, Suh, E, Bader, R. Advances in fetal cardiac intervention. Curr Opin Pediatr 2004; 16: 487–493.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
11. Mc Elhinney, DB, Marshall, AC, Wilkins-Haug, LE, et al. Predictors of technical success and postnatal biventricular outcome after in utero aortic valvuloplasty for aortic stenosis with evolving hypoplastic left heart syndrome. Circulation 2009; 120: 1482–1490.Google Scholar
12. Artz, W, Wertaschnigg, D, Veit, L, Klement, F, Gitter, R, Tulzer, G. Intrauterine aortic valvuloplasty in fetuses with critical aortic stenosis: experience and results of 24 procedures. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2011; 37: 689–695.Google Scholar
13. Schneider, C, McCrindle, BW, Carvalho, JS, Hornberger, LK, McCarthy, KP, Daubeney, PE. Development of Z-scores for fetal cardiac dimensions from echocardiography. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2005; 26: 599–605.Google Scholar
14. Daubeney, PE, Blackstone, EH, Weintraub, RG, Slavik, Z, Scanlon, J, Webber, SA. Relationship of the dimension of cardiac structures to body size: an echocardiographic study in normal infants and children. Cardiol Young 1999; 9: 402–410.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
15. Maxwell, D, Allan, L, Tynan, MJ. Balloon dilatation of the aortic valve in the fetus: a report of two cases. Br Heart J 1991; 65: 256–258.Google Scholar
16. Kohl, T, Sharland, G, Allan, LD, et al. World experience of percutaneous ultrasound-guided balloon valvuloplasty in human fetuses with severe aortic valve obstruction. Am J Cardiol 2000; 85: 1230–1233.Google Scholar
17. Wilkins-Haug, LE, Tworetzky, W, Benson, CB, Marshall, AC, Jennings, RW, Lock, JE. Factors affecting technical success of fetal aortic valve dilation. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2006; 28: 47–52.Google Scholar
18. Selamet Tierney, ES, Wald, RM, Mc Elhinney, DB, et al. Changes in left heart hemodynamics after technically successful in-utero aortic valvuloplasty. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2007; 30: 715–720.Google Scholar
19. Mizrahi-Arnaud, A, Tworetzky, W, Bulich, LA, et al. Pathophysiology, management, and outcomes of fetal hemodynamic instability during prenatal cardiac intervention. Pediatr Res 2007; 62: 325–333.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
20. Goldstein, BH, Fifer, CG, Armstrong, AK, et al. Use of a pressure guidewire in fetal cardiac intervention for critical aortic stenosis. Pediatrics 2011; 128: 716–719.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
21. Bruner, JP, Tulipan, N, Paschall, RL, et al. Fetal surgery for myelomeningocele and the incidence of shunt dependent hydrocephalus. JAMA 1999; 282: 1819–1825.Google Scholar
22. Harrison, MR, Sydorak, RM, Farrell, JA, Kitterman, JA, Filly, RA, Albanese, CT. Fetoscopic temporary tracheal occlusion for congenital diaphragmatic hernia: prelude to a randomized, controlled trial. J Pediatr Surg 2003; 38: 1012–1020.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
23. Deprest, J, Gratacos, E, Nicolaides, KH. Fetoscopic tracheal occlusion (FETO) for severe congenital diaphragmatic hernia: evolution of a technique and preliminary results. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2004; 24: 121–126.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
24. Brown, SC, Boshoff, D, Eyskens, B, Gewillig, M. Hybrid approach as bridge to biventricular repair in a neonate with critical aortic stenosis and borderline left ventricle. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2009; 35: 1080–1082.Google Scholar
25. Emani, SM, Bacha, EA, Mc Elhinney, DB, et al. Primary left ventricular rehabilitation is effective in maintaining two-ventricle physiology in the borderline left heart. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2009; 138: 1276–1282.Google Scholar
26. Moon-Grady, AJ, Moore, P, Azakie, A. Ross-Konno and endocardial fibroelastosis resection after hybrid stage I palliation in infancy: successful staged left-ventricular rehabilitation and conversion to biventricular circulation after fetal diagnosis of aortic stenosis. Pediatr Cardiol 2011; 32: 211–214.Google Scholar
27. Oepkes, D, Moon-Grady, AJ, Wilkins-Haug, L, Tworetzky, W, Arzt, W, Devlieger, R. 2010 Report from the ISPD Special Interest Group fetal therapy: fetal cardiac interventions. Prenat Diagn 2011; 31: 249–251.Google Scholar